Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - freedom

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 21
76
中文(Chinese) / Re: 动态打开和关闭某个功能是否必要
« on: February 19, 2016, 05:10:24 am »
我投反对票,反对一切增发稀释。

77
General Discussion / It's time to lower worker's salary because BTS is up.
« on: February 16, 2016, 04:34:41 pm »
It's time to lower worker's salary because BTS is up.

78
please notice what I say


why not after you do good effort and wait btser to vote . I think if you do really useful work to bts, they must vote support to your worker.

then please explain to me what alt / baozi is doing just now. I certainly does not recognize any value brought to the ecosystem.

If this goes on .. and more shareholders support him .. he could essential force the network to stand still in development ..

No one likes to dilute, that's why so many people support alt

79
中文(Chinese) / 建议worker工资铆钉美元
« on: February 09, 2016, 01:33:53 pm »
建议worker工资铆钉美元,既然是程序员,拿工资呗。
现在这模式,明显做空模式,原本1W一月的工资,BTS拉盘10倍工资就10W一月。试问谁敢入场买单?

80
Is there any dilution?

81
I have some questions, who can tell me?

1. we pay workers for USD, do you have different budget when the price changed?
     do you still dilution 10K USD per month for every worker even the price down to 0.0001 USD/BTS? that's 100M BTS/month.
2. what's the plan after all 3.7 billion have dilluted?
3. workers ask for a fair payment, should all others ask too? of course not everybody's worker will success, then their choise is leave BTS, do nothing for BTS if they can't get the payment. so here we are, we do everything only for money. I have no  interesting for such a community.
dilution until  the market cap to 0, go on.

I support you developer's work, but I will against all dilution workesrs at such price, to protect my BTS not go to zero.
please set "baozi" as your proxy if you against dilution.
+5% +5% +5%

82
I support  network 0%/referrer0%/burn 100%

83
General Discussion / Re: poll for the "1 BTS for transfer" proposal
« on: January 29, 2016, 04:40:36 am »
If you think you have a lot of users who want lower fees, then who are they? There are 11 pages of messages in this thread. I'm guessing (though I have not counted) that at least 20 or 30 different people have posted their thoughts. And it seems like only 2 or 3 posters actually want these low fees. Everyone else prefers to fund the system and help it grow.

Jakub keeps asking for evidence that low fees would attract people. Also, I question whether this poll is anywhere near accurate (I don't think so). If you have more real people who want lower fees, ask them not just to vote, but to post here also and explain why. They can write it in Chinese if they want. Then we'll believe they exist and we'll listen to their reasons.

As @jakub keeps asking you, please present some evidence that lower fees would help, not just the opinion of 2 or 3 loud posters. If there are more members than 2 or 3 who want lower fees, then ask them to post also.

I support low fees,我说中文你看得懂吗?这里有一吨的人支持low fees

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21192.0.html

84
不用了,牛逼的想法大家分享,然后没事了,谈钱多伤感情。 8)

85
说真的,推荐系统有用,我0几年用过,用的好牛叉的很。

建议
1、永久收手续费更有吸引力,现在这个限额40$不够吸引人,一劳永逸的事,谁的想做,哪怕辛苦一点。
2、更适合UIA,由UIA方提供注册手续费,推广的人只管推广拿手续费永久提成,这样才有动力。
      现在模式是最为推广者得我还得提供注册费,搞毛,被刷几下就血本无归。
3、简单又易用

如此推广,保证效果杠杠的

当然  30BTS手续费 确实太贵了

86
 I support Bitcrab

87
中文(Chinese) / Re: 公众号:hellobts,股权赠送
« on: January 27, 2016, 11:44:24 am »
能不能大方点,IFTHEN什么鸟东东,没有一点吸引力。

应该像VPN学习,20W大礼相送,拿钱包领!!

88
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: January 27, 2016, 01:24:32 am »
I confess to selling from ANGEL today to cover some expenses.   Unfortunately, I sold just prior to the big pump :( 

On the brighter side super33 appears to be out of BTS to sell.

This is our CEO?

89
不是
那些被冻结的BTS成本高达1毛3,。

90
中文(Chinese) / Re: 有关refund400k (1.14.0) 工作合同的说明
« on: January 26, 2016, 04:24:57 am »
楼主关于worker投票和排序的说法都没错,但是对手续费和refund worker、burn worker的理解有点偏差。
1、现在手续费不是销毁的,而是进储备池的
2、refund400k和4个burn100k收到的工资都是销毁的,不会进储备池
3、四个refund100k收到的工资是会回到储备池

可以参考我刚发的帖子。

//Update更新
之前的说法有误。
refund400K和refund100K的类型是一样的,发的工资都回到了储备池。
burn100k是转账到null-account,相当于销毁了
楼主说的没错。

回到储备池 就没意思了 因为币始终都会流通 通胀还是一样的 只是说的好听点
支持burn100K

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 ... 21