Quote from: gamey on October 18, 2014, 06:47:20 PM

Quote from: emailtooaj on October 18, 2014, 06:42:34 PM
+5%

Quote from: merockstar on October 18, 2014, 06:29:36 PM

Quote from: Ander on October 18, 2014, 06:18:12 PM
They should all be bitUSD. :)

complete with cross blockchain trading.

You still need price discovery mechanism.  IE an exchange.  So what you guys really want is a decentralized exchange.

If that's the way it has to be done, then sure. But it should appear as though you can send bitUSD from one of the music frontends, to a BitShares X wallet, and back. A silent, automatic, decentralized exchange that runs in the background could facilitate this, but it would be cool if bitUSD could be supported by multiple blockchains. Then the bitshares project would be like a network of networks.

Quote from: emailtooaj on October 18, 2014, 06:42:34 PM
+5%

Quote from: merockstar on October 18, 2014, 06:29:36 PM

Quote from: Ander on October 18, 2014, 06:18:12 PM
They should all be bitUSD. :)

complete with cross blockchain trading.

You still need price discovery mechanism.  IE an exchange.  So what you guys really want is a decentralized exchange.

 +5%

Quote from: merockstar on October 18, 2014, 06:29:36 PM

Quote from: Ander on October 18, 2014, 06:18:12 PM
They should all be bitUSD. :)

complete with cross blockchain trading.

Quote from: Ander on October 18, 2014, 06:18:12 PM
They should all be bitUSD. :)

complete with cross blockchain trading.

They should all be bitUSD. :)

There will be multiple bitUSDs from multiple DACs from outside and inside I3.  We know this.

So the question then becomes what is best naming system?

bitNOTEUSD ?   noteUSD  ? 

On some level it would be nice to have them suggested as part of the bitshares family, but I don't think that can reasonably be done.  I assume the answer will be something like noteUSD/voteUSD/bitUSD/jdsUSD