Rate your user experience for the full client [poll]

Started by matt608, February 08, 2015, 07:51:39 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

sudo

user experience need to be improvement a lot
solve user's  pain spot

bytemaster

For the latest updates checkout my blog: [url="http://bytemaster.bitshares.org"]http://bytemaster.bitshares.org[/url]
Anything said on these forums does not constitute an intent to create a legal obligation or contract between myself and anyone else.   These are merely my opinions and I reserve the right to change them at any time.

vikram

Good idea on the poll. I wonder could a more general survey to the mailing list be useful?

Quote from: arhag on February 08, 2015, 08:13:40 PM
Prior to v0.4.2?: Mostly works but there's a few bugs (then again the better performance may have just been a result of a smaller database back then)
v0.4.x and v0.5.x: There's lots of bugs and it's very slow, I rarely use it as a result (actually I would have preferred the poll option: The client's a POS, and I'm not talking about Proof of Stake ;))
v0.6.x: Mostly works but there's a few bugs (at least so far)

It was mostly the wallet scanning optimization fix that made things better.

I still think there is a performance bug (/ maybe memory leak) in the blockchain syncing code, but it seems to only be a problem when syncing the blockchain after being offline for a while. So I can work around the issue.

Now that wallet scanning is reasonable I'll try to visit the syncing code this week and see what can be done.

arhag

Prior to v0.4.2?: Mostly works but there's a few bugs (then again the better performance may have just been a result of a smaller database back then)
v0.4.x and v0.5.x: There's lots of bugs and it's very slow, I rarely use it as a result (actually I would have preferred the poll option: The client's a POS, and I'm not talking about Proof of Stake ;))
v0.6.x: Mostly works but there's a few bugs (at least so far)

It was mostly the wallet scanning optimization fix that made things better.

I still think there is a performance bug (/ maybe memory leak) in the blockchain syncing code, but it seems to only be a problem when syncing the blockchain after being offline for a while. So I can work around the issue.

matt608