Main Menu

An attack on DevShares

Started by Come-from-Beyond, February 09, 2015, 07:12:41 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Rune

Quote from: Troglodactyl on February 10, 2015, 05:29:11 PM
Hopefully the fact that our competitors are still pursuing POW (and proprietary, at that) gives us time to clean up our ui and get marketing caught up.

We only have one competitor, ethereum.

And they're not dicking around.

Troglodactyl

Hopefully the fact that our competitors are still pursuing POW (and proprietary, at that) gives us time to clean up our ui and get marketing caught up.

cube

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 10, 2015, 05:25:40 PM
Quote from: emski on February 10, 2015, 05:22:03 PM
They are not interesting anyway...
Anyone could create such hardware and require users to purchase it in order to use the system.
It is useless for bitshares as its goals are WIDE adoption and custom hardware prevents that.

Right. Let's assume that Sybil attack is mitigated and look for other weak spots.

Hold on. Can that be mitigated by making changes to the software codes?  I think something like DNS with reverse lookup and certificates can help.
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Come-from-Beyond

Quote from: emski on February 10, 2015, 05:22:03 PM
They are not interesting anyway...
Anyone could create such hardware and require users to purchase it in order to use the system.
It is useless for bitshares as its goals are WIDE adoption and custom hardware prevents that.

Right. Let's assume that Sybil attack is mitigated and look for other weak spots.

emski

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 10, 2015, 05:19:53 PM
Quote from: cube on February 10, 2015, 05:18:09 PM
Who is the competitor and what is your coy name?

The both are NDA'ed :)

They are not interesting anyway...
Anyone could create such hardware and require users to purchase it in order to use the system.
It is useless for bitshares as its goals are WIDE adoption and custom hardware prevents that.
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

Come-from-Beyond

Quote from: cube on February 10, 2015, 05:18:09 PM
Who is the competitor and what is your coy name?

The both are NDA'ed :)

Come-from-Beyond

Quote from: emski on February 10, 2015, 05:16:34 PM
Your proprietary solution require users to purchase your hardware.

This is the first case.


Quote from: emski on February 10, 2015, 05:16:34 PM
Your proprietary solution involves POW .

This is the second one.

cube

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 10, 2015, 05:16:46 PM

I don't promote our product. We have already sold this tech to one of your competitors and not interested in selling it to someone else. :)

Who is the competitor and what is your coy name?
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Come-from-Beyond

Quote from: cube on February 10, 2015, 05:14:51 PM
Am I sensing a product promotion opportunity here?

I don't promote our product. We have already sold this tech to one of your competitors and not interested in selling it to someone else. :)

emski

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 10, 2015, 05:13:18 PM
Quote from: emski on February 10, 2015, 05:07:37 PM
And what is that company ? You can PM me the name...

The same company that is developing the hardware that supports blockchain tech.

Is any of the following true for your proprietary solution:
Your proprietary solution require users to purchase your hardware.
Your proprietary solution decreases privacy .
Your proprietary solution decreases usability .
Your proprietary solution involves POW .
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

cube

Am I sensing a product promotion opportunity here?
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Come-from-Beyond

Quote from: emski on February 10, 2015, 05:07:37 PM
And what is that company ? You can PM me the name...

The same company that is developing the hardware that supports blockchain tech.

fluxer555

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 10, 2015, 05:05:03 PM
Quote from: fluxer555 on February 10, 2015, 05:02:22 PM
Right. Can you give an example?

EDIT: Reminds me when you look up 'beautiful' and the definition is 'full of beauty'

I can't give an example. I know 2 effective solutions, but one of them can't be used in BitShares and another is a proprietary tech of our company.

If this is the case, maybe you shouldn't dismiss using a sybil attack as your opening move ;)
Bitshares Wallet Recovery Service:
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24436.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,24436.0.html[/url]

emski

Quote from: Come-from-Beyond on February 10, 2015, 05:05:03 PM
Quote from: fluxer555 on February 10, 2015, 05:02:22 PM
Right. Can you give an example?

EDIT: Reminds me when you look up 'beautiful' and the definition is 'full of beauty'

I can't give an example. I know 2 effective solutions, but one of them can't be used in BitShares and another is a proprietary tech of our company.

And what is that company ? You can PM me the name...
[url="https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html"]https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,9857.0.html[/url]

Come-from-Beyond

Quote from: fluxer555 on February 10, 2015, 05:02:22 PM
Right. Can you give an example?

EDIT: Reminds me when you look up 'beautiful' and the definition is 'full of beauty'

I can't give an example. I know 2 effective solutions, but one of them can't be used in BitShares and another is a proprietary tech of our company.