Quote from: bytemaster on April 20, 2015, 01:08:54 PM
To Clarify:  Music is still planning their own chain and that hasn't changed.  I am merely attempting to find out what it would take to CHANGE that while still providing a win for NOTE holders.   It is possible that nothing could change that.  COB and Eddie have done said nothing and my position has long been a desire to bring them into BTS.

how about peertrack.com , does it belong to note holder ,i think it would belong to note holder ,
I think the value of note is out of chain ,
peertrack.com is a company ? note is the stake of this company? and the stake is exchanged in bts system ， is it right?

Quote from: Globally Distributed on April 20, 2015, 11:45:33 PM

Quote from: arhag on April 20, 2015, 11:43:50 PM

Quote from: robrigo on April 20, 2015, 03:15:16 PM
Basically, a new DAC is launching to focus on entertainment startups that want to leverage the functionality of BitShares. This DAC won't have market pegged assets and will function autonomously from BitShares. Multi-currency wallets such as moonstone will act as the bridge between multiple chains, so one can still trade between artistcoins issued on the Entertainment DAC and bitUSD issued on BitShares.

Citation needed.

not sure on the minute mark...
https://soundcloud.com/beyond-bitcoin-hangouts/beyond-bitcoin-music-dev-hangout-03-27-2015-s3

Thanks. I listened to this hangout before and don't remember the bolded conclusions above. I will listen to it again.

Although, I would appreciate it if bitsapphire could just confirm whether it is true or not and save me time.

Edit: I only skimmed through it (it would be so nice if there were transcripts), but I am pretty sure those claims were not made in that hangout.

Quote from: arhag on April 20, 2015, 11:43:50 PM

Quote from: robrigo on April 20, 2015, 03:15:16 PM
Basically, a new DAC is launching to focus on entertainment startups that want to leverage the functionality of BitShares. This DAC won't have market pegged assets and will function autonomously from BitShares. Multi-currency wallets such as moonstone will act as the bridge between multiple chains, so one can still trade between artistcoins issued on the Entertainment DAC and bitUSD issued on BitShares.

Citation needed.

not sure on the minute mark...
https://soundcloud.com/beyond-bitcoin-hangouts/beyond-bitcoin-music-dev-hangout-03-27-2015-s3

Quote from: robrigo on April 20, 2015, 03:15:16 PM
Basically, a new DAC is launching to focus on entertainment startups that want to leverage the functionality of BitShares. This DAC won't have market pegged assets and will function autonomously from BitShares. Multi-currency wallets such as moonstone will act as the bridge between multiple chains, so one can still trade between artistcoins issued on the Entertainment DAC and bitUSD issued on BitShares.

Citation needed.

 +5%

Cheers to Toast.

Quote from: yellowecho on April 20, 2015, 02:29:30 PM


TO TOAST!
(I still think BitSharesTOAST was the best idea that never happened)  :P

Hear, hear!

I still hope to purchase a .toast domain with crumbs and jelly someday soon.

Sent from my Cap'n Crunch Bo'sun whistle.

Glad to hear Toast has found a way to pay the rent and still contribute to the BTS project as well as others. I have complete faith in the the remaining core devs. Having Toast on other projects strengthens the ecosystem as a whole.

Quote from: luckybit on April 20, 2015, 03:16:28 PM

Quote from: tsaishen on April 20, 2015, 02:56:19 PM
Not to be stupid here, but what exactly the heck is notes and why is it not part of the blockchain?  I'm trying to grok the ecosystem a bit better here.
What would be their reason for running a blockchain fork which to my mind would be a hostile action.

In the future there might be a Bitshares VIDEO, who knows?

And a BitShares Digital Art!

Quote from: tsaishen on April 20, 2015, 02:56:19 PM
Not to be stupid here, but what exactly the heck is notes and why is it not part of the blockchain?  I'm trying to grok the ecosystem a bit better here.
What would be their reason for running a blockchain fork which to my mind would be a hostile action.

Scalability. By having multiple blockchains which we collectively own a piece of the DPoS community scan scale. What doesn't necessarily remain the same is the percentages of holdings but that's not so important to everyone.

The social consensus is that 10% would go to AGS and PTS. As a result the community owns a stake in Bitshares Music even though it is a separate chain. Additionally Bitshares can communicate with Bitshares Music through ACCT (atomic cross chain transactions).

Notes had a separate crowdsale and you're free to buy some Notes if you want but it's not the same purpose of Bitshares. It's for music artists exclusively. In the future there might be a Bitshares VIDEO, who knows?

Check out http://whatarenotes.info.

Basically, a new DAC is launching to focus on entertainment startups that want to leverage the functionality of BitShares. This DAC won't have market pegged assets and will function autonomously from BitShares. Multi-currency wallets such as moonstone will act as the bridge between multiple chains, so one can still trade between artistcoins issued on the Entertainment DAC and bitUSD issued on BitShares.

The reason it is being launched separate dates back to the idea of multiple DACs using the BitShares toolkit- some of the projects started were merged into BitShares (VOTE and DNS for instance) while others (Play and Music) are still working on their own version of the code.

Quote from: tsaishen on April 20, 2015, 02:56:19 PM
Not to be stupid here, but what exactly the heck is notes and why is it not part of the blockchain?  I'm trying to grok the ecosystem a bit better here.
What would be their reason for running a blockchain fork which to my mind would be a hostile action.

What are NOTEs
http://whatarenotes.info/

Not to be stupid here, but what exactly the heck is notes and why is it not part of the blockchain?  I'm trying to grok the ecosystem a bit better here.
What would be their reason for running a blockchain fork which to my mind would be a hostile action.

Thanks for the clarification BM.. the vacuum of silence here on matters like this creates a lot of crazy new stories.

when can i get some bittoast?