Are we going to be the first, bitAPPLE (article)

Started by eagleeye, July 12, 2015, 05:17:23 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

cylonmaker2053

Quote from: MrJeans on July 12, 2015, 09:26:03 PM
Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 12, 2015, 09:22:11 PM
Quote from: jcalfee1 on July 12, 2015, 04:10:00 PM
Dividend feed?

surely possible and maybe worthwhile. i wonder if Bitshares had sufficient trading volume that a bitMSFT or whatever would see the shorting interest rate roughly equal the dividend rate? that'd be an interesting experiment. the nature of shorting assets into existence right now could feasibly mimic dividend yields without adding any additional features to the system, like a div feed.
I believe yield is to be taken out in 2.0. Maybe it should be made an optional feature to be included on a case by case bases

bitassets won't have the ability to earn interest in 2.0???

starspirit

As long as you are happy for bitAPPLE to represent a number of Apple shares that grows over time, you can always define the exposure as as accumulation index that assumes any dividends are reinvested. Price feeds would need to adjust accordingly. This would mean no dividends are required to be distributed.

MrJeans

Quote from: cylonmaker2053 on July 12, 2015, 09:22:11 PM
Quote from: jcalfee1 on July 12, 2015, 04:10:00 PM
Dividend feed?

surely possible and maybe worthwhile. i wonder if Bitshares had sufficient trading volume that a bitMSFT or whatever would see the shorting interest rate roughly equal the dividend rate? that'd be an interesting experiment. the nature of shorting assets into existence right now could feasibly mimic dividend yields without adding any additional features to the system, like a div feed.
I believe yield is to be taken out in 2.0. Maybe it should be made an optional feature to be included on a case by case bases

cylonmaker2053

Quote from: jcalfee1 on July 12, 2015, 04:10:00 PM
Dividend feed?

surely possible and maybe worthwhile. i wonder if Bitshares had sufficient trading volume that a bitMSFT or whatever would see the shorting interest rate roughly equal the dividend rate? that'd be an interesting experiment. the nature of shorting assets into existence right now could feasibly mimic dividend yields without adding any additional features to the system, like a div feed.

MrJeans

Quote from: xeroc on July 12, 2015, 02:46:06 PM
Quote from: Erlich Bachman on July 12, 2015, 02:12:44 PM
Step 2 add the individual high volume components (APPL, GOOG, FB,AMZN,etc)
With BitShares 2.0 and privatized bit assets this will be a no-brainer that can make you a profit :D
But pssst .. don't tell anyone
I am sure there must be a way to pay dividends through privatized bit assets, right?
Send some bitUSD to every account in proportion to their ownership of the asset.


Erlich Bachman

Correct just advertise the transaction cost, everything else being equal.

Right there, you just crushed the legacy business model.  Wait until some other smartchain can offer at least what BitShares can do, if you want to sweeten the deal any more.  Don't give away the milk for free unless they are too.
Quote from: Akado on December 14, 2015, 10:34:48 AM
You own the network, but who pays for development?

monsterer

To me it makes more sense to target non-dividend paying assets because otherwise you won't be able to claim equivalence when promoting them.
My opinions do not represent those of metaexchange unless explicitly stated.
[url="https://metaexchange.info"]https://metaexchange.info[/url] | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

xeroc

Quote from: Erlich Bachman on July 12, 2015, 02:12:44 PM
Step 2 add the individual high volume components (APPL, GOOG, FB,AMZN,etc)
With BitShares 2.0 and privatized bit assets this will be a no-brainer that can make you a profit :D
But pssst .. don't tell anyone

Erlich Bachman

Step 1 add the indicies for the DOW/NASDAQ/etc. components
Step 2 add the individual high volume components (APPL, GOOG, FB,AMZN,etc)
Step 3 add lower liquidity components as markets demand
Quote from: Akado on December 14, 2015, 10:34:48 AM
You own the network, but who pays for development?

eagleeye

TheValueSwan
www.thevalueswan.com