Having percentage based fees with min and max caps is the best solution for the greatest number of interests. It would help to accommodate most of the many different business models that may be interested in making use of our platform. And it supports both the referral scheme and profits for the blockchain.

So.  What is your opinion of using the fee pool funds collected to help support the bitasset peg?

What is your opinion of using worker funds to support the bitasset peg beyond this?

I am of the opinion that the fees are not as important as the product.

Sorry to derail your thread, I just don't know when I will get a chance to ask in a thread that is getting this much attention from our Chinese members.

Quote from: deer on January 28, 2016, 07:37:56 AM
The referral should base on mature application、user numbers、outside funding
We got none of this now，

what do you base your opinion on? do you even know how many users register through the referral program (hint: A LOT)

The referral should base on mature application、user numbers、outside funding
We got none of this now，thanks to the high fee and uncertain rules.
So if we don't solve this problem，The referral is just a daydream without any endorse.
It's not even better then a ponzi scheme（at least they have strong marketing skills）
Should we "dream on"？or wake up？

lower fee may be can't solve the problems. because high fee just one of the obstacle ，not all of the obstacle.
Lifetime Referrer not the key to attract new users. Lifetime Referrer just promote to help attract new users
The key to attract new users must be the DAC itself. low fee , simple rule,safe and fast.

seeking the right way.

Just leave the fees as they are.

I do not think lower fees will magically solve the problems that we're having. The referral program needs to stay intact in order to attract marketeers and users.

How do you earn new users when there's no incentive?

rule should be as simple as possible，fee should be as low as possable.

I very support this idea,
lower fee is the best way at current step.

bts is just a baby now , do you want a baby can get income ?

did  referral work fine?
why should the users  choose  bts?

You stated your point well.

My concern with removing the incentive for the referral program, is that its just going to cause more of this "bitshares is always changing the rules" talk.  wouldn't that hurt us more than finding a solution that keeps the referral program in tact?  Abit has stated that he would accept the majority of his payment as vesting for 6 months or 1 year.

Thanks for the clear communication on this bitcrab. 

 +5% +5%

we need new users

Support, that is think bigger   +5%

Support, we need more new users