Quote from: xeroc on February 22, 2016, 08:05:59 PM
CNX has been informed, a fix has been commited and yunbi can restart their test for reactivation of deposits/withdrawals

The problem is they are still accepting deposits. There is nowhere on the deposit screen that indicates there are issues with the software. Following the yun-muse account here: http://muse.cryptofresh.com/u/yun-muse you can see people are still sending money into the void.


I have been inquiring about the status of this and it seems they are in deadlock with CNX saying things are fixed and Yunbi saying they are still broken.


In the mean time I encourage everyone to use the IOU.MUSE on the BitShares exchange until this issue is resolved.

True.

How would someone know OL is an independent exchange if is only seen in the "Bitshares Wallet". It need to be separate. The whole branding is confusing. I've mentioned it before. bitshares.openledger.info doesn't sound like an openledger exchange. It should be
www.openledger.info . I've never understood how it the way it is now could be perceived as being clear. This whole opeledger defacto bitshares blah blah is nonsense.  I've been with this since angelshares and this branding confused me. I don't know how a new person could ever comprehend what is going on.

PS.

Its real simple. It should be,

www.openledger.info    "The first and largest exchange built on the Bitshares DEX platform"

Quote from: ccedk on March 12, 2016, 03:51:34 PM

Quote from: sudo on March 12, 2016, 03:22:31 PM
still not work
the only exchange for muse！！！！！！！！！！！

why only exchange? OpenLedger offers Muse in many versions

Because people don't perceive OL as an exchange. It's just a function of wallet. I repeatedly argue that OL needs its own specialized frontend.

Quote from: sudo on March 12, 2016, 03:22:31 PM
still not work
the only exchange for muse！！！！！！！！！！！

why only exchange? OpenLedger offers Muse in many versions

still not work
the only exchange for muse！！！！！！！！！！！

This is the issue that took them some time:
https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/561

I told them how to "fix" it .. now it is their turn ..

Quote from: xeroc on February 25, 2016, 02:28:55 PM
I am in direct contact with their devs and they haven't not complained about the patched version ..

Cool. Hopefully they are back up soon. Looking at the yun-muse account there are millions in limbo.

I am in direct contact with their devs and they haven't not complained about the patched version ..

Quote from: Riverhead on February 25, 2016, 12:51:28 PM

Quote from: sudo on February 25, 2016, 12:43:24 PM

Quote from: cob on February 23, 2016, 09:29:03 PM
MUSE 1.0.160219 release should fix Yunbi's problem.

https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse/releases

yunbi say  it's still not work

What isn't working? API?

i don't know
the  customer service says not work

Quote from: sudo on February 25, 2016, 12:43:24 PM

Quote from: cob on February 23, 2016, 09:29:03 PM
MUSE 1.0.160219 release should fix Yunbi's problem.

https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse/releases

yunbi say  it's still not work

What isn't working? API?

Quote from: cob on February 23, 2016, 09:29:03 PM
MUSE 1.0.160219 release should fix Yunbi's problem.

https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse/releases

yunbi say  it's still not work

Release Notes:

QuoteFix build error due to missing hardfork.hpp #511
Optimize some indexes #529

Those were manual fixes from months back, I do not see anything in the release notes that would address the network issues that yunbi and others are having?

MUSE 1.0.160219 release should fix Yunbi's problem.

https://github.com/peertracksinc/muse/releases

Quote from: Ronald_Law on February 22, 2016, 03:05:12 PM
cob is a rubbish

That is harsh, it is not like he is the one writing the software?

CNX has been informed, a fix has been commited and yunbi can restart their test for reactivation of deposits/withdrawals