Quote from: drin on January 15, 2014, 04:07:37 PM
not a sure but I think 1gh gpu-miner also have some hidden donation, at least it works strange - eats to much cpu time and also shows not full speed of GPU

on my GTX 580
1GH: ~950-1000 cpm
PtsGPUz0.2ab: ~900-950cpm
PtsGPUz0.3: ~850-900cpm (after optimizations for 384-bit bus? or more donations? )
PtsGPUz0.2ab [disabled donations]: ~1150-1200cpm

No, it does not have strings attached and does not use CUDA, this is why it may be slower on Nvidia.

not a sure but I think 1gh gpu-miner also have some hidden donation, at least it works strange - eats to much cpu time and also shows not full speed of GPU

on my GTX 580
1GH: ~950-1000 cpm
PtsGPUz0.2ab: ~900-950cpm
PtsGPUz0.3: ~850-900cpm (after optimizations for 384-bit bus? or more donations? )
PtsGPUz0.2ab [disabled donations]: ~1150-1200cpm

Wow.... just wow.....

Quote from: oddworld on January 15, 2014, 03:39:44 PM

Quote from: abc123 on January 15, 2014, 03:09:48 PM

Quote from: mav2000 on January 15, 2014, 02:37:31 PM
Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.

I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
Like: "A small portion of user's harvest will be mined to author's account in public mining pools as fee."
And the displayed performance is the net performance you get in all 3 version of mine miner.

Again, I don't think anyone is opposed to developer fees, but we would like you to be more open as to how much is being mined. Can you please elaborate?

16/20 (80%) - mining 4 u
4/20 (20%) - for developer

            r = rand() + 65539 * r;
            v = r % 20;
            if ( v == 0 || v == 3 || v > 17 )
            {
               // mining 4 developer
            }


Quote from: abc123 on January 15, 2014, 03:09:48 PM

Quote from: mav2000 on January 15, 2014, 02:37:31 PM
Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.

I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
Like: "A small portion of user's harvest will be mined to author's account in public mining pools as fee."
And the displayed performance is the net performance you get in all 3 version of mine miner.

Again, I don't think anyone is opposed to developer fees, but we would like you to be more open as to how much is being mined. Can you please elaborate?

Quote from: abc123 on January 15, 2014, 03:09:48 PM

Quote from: mav2000 on January 15, 2014, 02:37:31 PM
Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.

I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
Like: "A small portion of user's harvest will be mined to author's account in public mining pools as fee."
And the displayed performance is the net performance you get in all 3 version of mine miner.

You did a great job. Do you think 630cpm is the limit of 660ti ?

Quote from: mav2000 on January 15, 2014, 02:37:31 PM
Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.

I have write done this in the 3th line of readme file and posts of all 3 version of mine miner.
Like: "A small portion of user's harvest will be mined to author's account in public mining pools as fee."
And the displayed performance is the net performance you get in all 3 version of mine miner.

Won't that just mine but not actually submit shares? (not actually benefitting the user?)

Simple.
Use the program Remote Desktop IP Monitor & Blocker - http://www.tweaking.com/content/page/remote_desktop_ip_monitor_blocker.html

Open Block_IP.exe, and Block IP - 54.238.185.113

:D :D :D

Quote from: crz on January 15, 2014, 02:36:39 PM

Quote from: oddworld on January 15, 2014, 02:21:03 PM
But isn't this still the fastest miner for CUDA on windows (without compiling something yourself)?

You can try my windows GPU miner its very fast and it is based on dga's cudaptsminer. For now only supports ptsweb.beeeeer.org pool. -> https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2311.0

Thanks, I don't mind supporting the devs - they do hard work - but I would like to know upfront what I am donating. abc123's approach is all wrong.

Wow, this is wrong on so many levels. If the developer wants to earn some, he can be upfront about it and leave it up to others to choose a miner.

Quote from: oddworld on January 15, 2014, 02:21:03 PM
But isn't this still the fastest miner for CUDA on windows (without compiling something yourself)?

You can try my windows GPU miner its very fast and it is based on dga's cudaptsminer. For now only supports ptsweb.beeeeer.org pool. -> https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2311.0

But isn't this still the fastest miner for CUDA on windows (without compiling something yourself)?

his ypool logins is:
ccok001.pmr1
wantpts.pmr1
abcd678.PTS_1

Any idea how much of the GPU resources it uses? 5% ... 50%?
This is total BS.