I could be wrong, but I think ETH may be running out of steam here. 

Quote from: Empirical1.2 on March 28, 2016, 06:13:06 PM
I'm margin selling all the way up to 0.030 myself.

You made the mistake to not participate on ethereum crowd-sale... don't make another one! We need you here...healthy!

Quote from: Tuck Fheman on March 28, 2016, 04:32:23 PM
There goes .027 .028, next stop ... ?

I'm margin selling all the way up to 0.030 myself.

(Edit: Looks like the bump earlier  today was the result of a pretty good NY times article https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/4cahmk/the_new_york_times_on_twitter_bitcoin_has/ )

There goes .027 .028, next stop ... ?

weeeeeeee

Eth is like some monster from a horror flick that just wont die.  It keeps getting wounded, but then bam it springs back out of the sea.  Why won't it just die?

Full disclosure I have a very small short open on polo.  About 5 eth.  I use polo margin as a replacement for other types of gambling that I might otherwise engage in.

Quote from: Empirical1.2 on March 26, 2016, 01:48:24 PM
Barring any really good unexpected news in the next week, I think ETH will go below $500 million.

Their latest update did feature a cliff face as their first image of choice in presenting Ethereums road ahead.

https://lnkd.in/d5F8UKi

Horrible PR blender.. or subliminal warning?

Read the commentaries.. I can't find a lot of happy campers.

Barring any really good unexpected news in the next week, I think ETH will go below $500 million.

Here's my updated ETH outlook ...



One of them will be right. ;)

Welp, guess we're done going down.

I got half my buys done otw down, so I guess that'll have to do for now.

It's a bit off topic but I still ask this question here because most of the traders of this community watch this thread.

You (traders) probably saw my thread on the creation of a weighted index of the top 20 cryptocurrencies by market capitalisation. It's almost done, it shouldn't be long now for me to officialize the web site and create the smartcoin.

If you didn't see the thread, here it is : https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21999.30.html

The force settlement offset is by default at 1%, @Empirical1.2  tell me this :

"If I was too guess, I would think you might have more people willing to go long than short, so you would probably want to offset that with settings that are more favourable for shorters. A force settlement offset of 5% should be more positive for people shorting the index as they would be less worried that they are going to be force settled against unexpectedly. I think, I'm not sure about that though."

Which make a lot of sense ! Any of you have some thought about it or see another % fit better ???

Please consider answer on the original thread ( https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21999.30.html ) so it doesn't disturb the conversation on the bts price, thanks guys ;p

Digix and Slock.it crowdsales can still keep the price afloat or rise it. Don't forget some people have been buying to participate in them.

Quote from: Ander on March 25, 2016, 04:20:14 PM
Then we can all buy some cheap ETH again.

That wouldn't suck.

Looks down to me too.  Some bounces along the way, but to lower highs.  If it breaks the neckline of the potential H&S it might be forming, it will go down really hard.  Then we can all buy some cheap ETH again.

"ETHUSD may move down further moving ahead"
http://www.newsbtc.com/2016/03/25/ethereum-price-technical-analysis-03252016-buyers-struggle-keep-pace/

m0ar downward red arrows to look at. ;)