Quote from: bitsharesbrazil on June 17, 2016, 05:16:49 PM

Quote from: dannotestein on June 17, 2016, 05:08:39 PM

Quote from: bitsharesbrazil on June 17, 2016, 05:01:49 PM
Xeroc if you access x.makerdao.com you will see that there is only eth:makerdao market......mpa....open...etc is not listed......
If orderbooks are shared that pretty good.....if we could dvelop togheter better yet.......

The markerdao guys just made a decision to show only their own assets in their version of the web wallet, IIRC.

There's actually been a lot of people who have suggested the same for OpenLedger UI, although I'm not personally in favor of the idea. Personally I think it makes sense for an exchange to "highlight" the markets it is associated with or would like to promote (for example a pair between two exchange such as OL to Transwiser, for instance), but still leave other markets viewable (except to block out any well-known scammy UIAs like the "lisk" one that doesn't honor it's backing).

I really even if bts graphene is opensource avoid show all markets is a RETRACEMENT/ridiculous,
Is there a way to avoid such practice, it does not help them n does no help bishares it does not DECENTRALIZATION AS A whole......
We could be a conglomerate fully decentralized openledger freedomledger makerdao whateverit whateverthat n develop togheer n everyone benefi...... Share gateways, bridges....what the hell is in people minds

use the desktop client if you don't want your experience disturbed. front-ends can be edited by the hoster.

Quote from: dannotestein on June 17, 2016, 05:08:39 PM

Quote from: bitsharesbrazil on June 17, 2016, 05:01:49 PM
Xeroc if you access x.makerdao.com you will see that there is only eth:makerdao market......mpa....open...etc is not listed......
If orderbooks are shared that pretty good.....if we could dvelop togheter better yet.......

The markerdao guys just made a decision to show only their own assets in their version of the web wallet, IIRC.

There's actually been a lot of people who have suggested the same for OpenLedger UI, although I'm not personally in favor of the idea. Personally I think it makes sense for an exchange to "highlight" the markets it is associated with or would like to promote (for example a pair between two exchange such as OL to Transwiser, for instance), but still leave other markets viewable (except to block out any well-known scammy UIAs like the "lisk" one that doesn't honor it's backing).

I really even if bts graphene is opensource avoid show all markets is a RETRACEMENT/ridiculous,
Is there a way to avoid such practice, it does not help them n does no help bishares it does not DECENTRALIZATION AS A whole......
We could be a conglomerate fully decentralized openledger freedomledger makerdao whateverit whateverthat n develop togheer n everyone benefi...... Share gateways, bridges....what the hell is in people minds

Quote from: bitsharesbrazil on June 17, 2016, 05:01:49 PM
Xeroc if you access x.makerdao.com you will see that there is only eth:makerdao market......mpa....open...etc is not listed......
If orderbooks are shared that pretty good.....if we could dvelop togheter better yet.......

The markerdao guys just made a decision to show only their own assets in their version of the web wallet, IIRC.

There's actually been a lot of people who have suggested the same for OpenLedger UI, although I'm not personally in favor of the idea. Personally I think it makes sense for an exchange to "highlight" the markets it is associated with or would like to promote (for example a pair between two exchange such as OL to Transwiser, for instance), but still leave other markets viewable (except to block out any well-known scammy UIAs like the "lisk" one that doesn't honor it's backing).

There's been a lot of concern expressed about liquidity associated with having a lot of pairs, but with bots like ar3b1tr around, you can place orders on markets with no orders and get fills, which I think is actually pretty cool.

Xeroc if you access x.makerdao.com you will see that there is only eth:makerdao market......mpa....open...etc is not listed......
If orderbooks are shared that pretty good.....if we could dvelop togheter better yet.......

orderbooks ARE shared .. just search them in the markets

But their orderbook is not shared with openledger right? If they develop a new feature to the system if they develop.a feature to the system can we incorporate it freely like they got it?

makerX is not a fork .. it's BitShares .. they just deployed their own white-labeled frontend .. the code OpenLedger is running is public domain and anyone can do the same thing.
Take a look at secure.freedomledger.com .. same thing ..
same network ..

no clone
no fork

Is there a positive thing in this for bts n cryptonomex? Maybe Im missing somenthing, will they interoperate anyway?

Is that right?

Maker hired cryptonomex for support their project or any thing similar?

Pretty much the same software, what joke :D i appears to be a fork