awesome! i can let my 6990 chug away without a care in the world now! its already almost mined in 3 days what my 2 cpus and 3xvps did in a month.... im not sure if i should be happy or sad about that  :)

Quote from: Nerull on January 18, 2014, 03:47:29 PM
was wondering if there are plans to let us fine tune settings like in cgminer to squeeze out a bit of extra cpm!

cgminer is crunching hundreds thousands rather simple hashes per second so it can let you adjust the 'spacing' between then and how many to process at once. PTS does a couple thousand 'hashes' per minute tops, and running even two threads of it in parallel slows down both in more than half on any card. So, there is essentially nothing to tune. The only 'variable' is memory size, and the miner automatically chooses the best for your card.

was wondering if there are plans to let us fine tune settings like in cgminer to squeeze out a bit of extra cpm!

Quote from: earntodie on January 18, 2014, 03:40:32 PM

Quote from: reorder on January 18, 2014, 03:19:49 PM

Quote from: mav2000 on January 18, 2014, 03:11:21 PM
Funny, after my last message here, my share per block has gone down to .030 +/- a bit. Have a lot of new miners jumped onto 1GH lately?

Also is 1070 cpm ok on a 770 GTX? Will it get better if I OC the card?

The pool hashrate has increased 15-20% in the last 24h, so indeed your share got lower, but this also means blocks are being found more often on average now. (And the pool luck has improved a lot in the last hours, but it is just a lottery of course).

I think noone has reported CPM for 770 yet, so I cannot tell if 1070 cpm is right for it. Overclocking will improve it of course.

What about MAC miners?

Nvidia OpenCL compiler that Apple ships with Mavericks crashes on my kernel (on many of them in fact) without any error message, so I cannot promise anything about it yet. But we are working on yam support on our pool.

Quote from: reorder on January 18, 2014, 03:19:49 PM

Quote from: mav2000 on January 18, 2014, 03:11:21 PM
Funny, after my last message here, my share per block has gone down to .030 +/- a bit. Have a lot of new miners jumped onto 1GH lately?

Also is 1070 cpm ok on a 770 GTX? Will it get better if I OC the card?

The pool hashrate has increased 15-20% in the last 24h, so indeed your share got lower, but this also means blocks are being found more often on average now. (And the pool luck has improved a lot in the last hours, but it is just a lottery of course).

I think noone has reported CPM for 770 yet, so I cannot tell if 1070 cpm is right for it. Overclocking will improve it of course.

What about MAC miners?

Quote from: mav2000 on January 18, 2014, 03:11:21 PM
Funny, after my last message here, my share per block has gone down to .030 +/- a bit. Have a lot of new miners jumped onto 1GH lately?

Also is 1070 cpm ok on a 770 GTX? Will it get better if I OC the card?

The pool hashrate has increased 15-20% in the last 24h, so indeed your share got lower, but this also means blocks are being found more often on average now. (And the pool luck has improved a lot in the last hours, but it is just a lottery of course).

I think noone has reported CPM for 770 yet, so I cannot tell if 1070 cpm is right for it. Overclocking will improve it of course.

Funny, after my last message here, my share per block has gone down to .030 +/- a bit. Have a lot of new miners jumped onto 1GH lately?

Also is 1070 cpm ok on a 770 GTX? Will it get better if I OC the card?

@reorder

I just switched back to mining PTS with your miner. It is working now for my Nvidia card, but you probably know this already.

Results are good for me. I am using a GTX 670 and avg about 910-940 cpm, 271 hpm

And I notice no lag doing other things like I did with another one for PTS.

is there an option to point the gpu miner towards another pool ?

Gigabyte GTX 770 OC - 1100 CPM

Gigabyte GTX 760 OC rev2 (overclocked to 1245/6350) -- 940cpm / 276 hpm -- PTS.1GHS.COM cuda miner for windows

I use an AMD card R9 290X, only 1030cpm!
Why?

Fastest miner out there for me,  660cm on 560Ti (384 shaders) good job !

I just learned:
as the block length varies, the number of submitted shares will too vary, and thus is not directly correlated to the payout value.
At constant c/m payout will be more or less the same while submitted shares for a block are fluctuating (for all of us BTW).

So this explains why submitted share number seems not to be related to payout.

BTW: since yesterday pool hashrate (only considering top 100 miners) went up from 150K c/m to 350K c/m
This is gaining momentum !!! ;-)

@mav2000 @agc
Guys, would you please PM addresses you mine with so I could look up your history?