Hey fuzzy, here are the results of your tips...

• abit: has been credited 1 SILVERTICKET

Quote from: btswildpig on July 08, 2016, 12:08:31 PM
what are you thinking , charging BTS on stocks or charging stocks on stocks ?

The network takes BTS .. the issuer can decide to allow its holders to pay in stock via the fee pool ..
still .. for some assets it makes sense to have a 0 fee .. while for others it does not .. that's all I am trying to say

Quote from: xeroc on July 08, 2016, 08:35:36 AM
a) We need a hard fork
b) there are some issues with it that make the code messy (iirc)
c) we need someone to properly audit the code
d) there is no money to pay any of the points above .. yet
e) If you think about it .. it may make sense to have a way more powerfull fee structure .. for instance, ideally bitUSD can be transfered for free, while stock shares shouldn't ..

what are you thinking , charging BTS on stocks or charging stocks on stocks ?

It will be another powerful tool in our toolbox :)

+5%

(testing)
#sharebits "abit" 1 SILVERTICKET

a) We need a hard fork
b) there are some issues with it that make the code messy (iirc)
c) we need someone to properly audit the code
d) there is no money to pay any of the points above .. yet
e) If you think about it .. it may make sense to have a way more powerfull fee structure .. for instance, ideally bitUSD can be transfered for free, while stock shares shouldn't ..

Quote from: xeroc on July 07, 2016, 11:14:30 AM

Quote from: Akado on July 07, 2016, 09:42:03 AM
I've been away, has this been done and currently live on chain?

Nop ..

Huum, but didn't @abit code it? What's missing here? Tests? Or is it because we need a hard fork?

Quote from: Akado on July 07, 2016, 09:42:03 AM
I've been away, has this been done and currently live on chain?

Nop ..

I've been away, has this been done and currently live on chain?

Quote from: Thom on March 07, 2016, 12:55:31 PM

Quote from: abit on March 07, 2016, 11:31:15 AM

Quote from: Akado on March 07, 2016, 11:20:19 AM
How will referrers like OpenLedger be affected by these type of fees? Their revenue coming from this will be significantly lower.

A business shouldn't rely solely on that but it's one less revenue stream.

If I remembered correctly Ronny of OpenLedger welcomes this feature. Someone can help check again. Lower fees sometimes means more users, so maybe better combined results.

If so I couldn't find it searching over the last 2 months using keyword "fee" and member ccedk.

I remember he said it in Telegram BitShares channel. Perhaps I'm wrong though.

Quote from: Akado on March 07, 2016, 01:29:46 PM

Quote from: abit on March 07, 2016, 11:31:15 AM

Quote from: Akado on March 07, 2016, 11:20:19 AM
How will referrers like OpenLedger be affected by these type of fees? Their revenue coming from this will be significantly lower.

A business shouldn't rely solely on that but it's one less revenue stream.

If I remembered correctly Ronny of OpenLedger welcomes this feature. Someone can help check again. Lower fees sometimes means more users, so maybe better combined results.

I agree, but it does kill the referral program right? It makes it a little bit useless now, not 100% sure, but it's possible revenues get severely restricted right?

I actually prefer it this way, I just want to know because of the rate limited fees BSIP. I havent got much time lately, was sick and only managed to get an introduction. Need more info on this kind of stuff, even though I think I won't be able to pull it off due to lack of time. I'll just try making what I can and have someone else complete it.

Thanks for your efforts.  :D

In regards to the referral program, I had same feeling at the very beginning. However from a technical POV, I managed to put my efforts on developing it, IMO stake holders can always decide whether to use it, or how to use it. See this post:

Quote from: bytemaster on February 10, 2016, 03:39:21 PM

Quote from: abit on February 10, 2016, 03:37:48 PM
Just one thing, you built the referral program, don't try to kill it.

I'm not trying to kill it. Just give BTS more flexibility in how to use it.

Quote from: abit on March 07, 2016, 11:31:15 AM

Quote from: Akado on March 07, 2016, 11:20:19 AM
How will referrers like OpenLedger be affected by these type of fees? Their revenue coming from this will be significantly lower.

A business shouldn't rely solely on that but it's one less revenue stream.

If I remembered correctly Ronny of OpenLedger welcomes this feature. Someone can help check again. Lower fees sometimes means more users, so maybe better combined results.

I agree, but it does kill the referral program right? It makes it a little bit useless now, not 100% sure, but it's possible revenues get severely restricted right?

I actually prefer it this way, I just want to know because of the rate limited fees BSIP. I havent got much time lately, was sick and only managed to get an introduction. Need more info on this kind of stuff, even though I think I won't be able to pull it off due to lack of time. I'll just try making what I can and have someone else complete it.

Quote from: abit on March 07, 2016, 11:31:15 AM

Quote from: Akado on March 07, 2016, 11:20:19 AM
How will referrers like OpenLedger be affected by these type of fees? Their revenue coming from this will be significantly lower.

A business shouldn't rely solely on that but it's one less revenue stream.

If I remembered correctly Ronny of OpenLedger welcomes this feature. Someone can help check again. Lower fees sometimes means more users, so maybe better combined results.

If so I couldn't find it searching over the last 2 months using keyword "fee" and member ccedk.

Quote from: Akado on March 07, 2016, 11:20:19 AM
How will referrers like OpenLedger be affected by these type of fees? Their revenue coming from this will be significantly lower.

A business shouldn't rely solely on that but it's one less revenue stream.

If I remembered correctly Ronny of OpenLedger welcomes this feature. Someone can help check again. Lower fees sometimes means more users, so maybe better combined results.

How will referrers like OpenLedger be affected by these type of fees? Their revenue coming from this will be significantly lower.

A business shouldn't rely solely on that but it's one less revenue stream.

I think it would be best if there is not a separate worker proposal for marketing video but instead some part of the actual worker proposal funds for this feature would be pointed for the video. We could probably also raise some sum with donations, at least I could give something like $20 for this.

Quote from: Samupaha on February 18, 2016, 04:02:51 PM
I'd like to see some marketing budget to be included in the worker proposal, for example for a short video that explains clearly how Bitshares will function from now on. This revolutionary feature has to be understood, otherwise people won't get interested and won't care.

I totaly agree!

To everyone who cares about marketing

We already got an offer. Hypercube wrote here that he is able to prepare such video, but he needs some funding. I wrote to him, that he should create a worker proposal, then he wrote:

Quote from: Hypercube on February 16, 2016, 08:11:14 PM
To be honest, I doubt there's enough interest.
We'll need to raise thousands to make this happen. With just 9 replies 3 retweets and 375 views....  in two weeks.

So... if we want to have a proper video campain, we have to say that at loud to someone who can prepare such video! Please give @Hypercube some feedback in  his thread