Been using this for about half a day on RPool.

RPool shows a total paid out of .090523355

Yet when I run my wallet I don't have one transaction from RPool. Wallet shows up to date with 7 active connections. I have triple checked the wallet address and it matches from my wallet tothe payment in the bat

When does this program take it's fee?

All of my payments from 1GH shows up fine.

Quote from: Gwynbleidd on January 18, 2014, 09:46:59 AM
Are u fuckin serious!?
You have the fastest CUDA miner, faster than 1GH and you can mine on YPOOL! Not shitty 1GH pool. where block found rate is lame low so profits too.
In future ofc it should be lower, but for now when devs jusy made amazing job he should get premium.

But anyway, does someone tried this version?

@edit
Scanned, no viruses.
On my 680 CMP is lower than on normal version...

Quote from: Ivsh1n on January 17, 2014, 04:37:31 PM
My ASUS GTX760-DC2OC-2GD5 get 1040 cpm with config 1200/7000 ! Amazing! Like 780!

You mean like 680 or 770...

Your average payout in the long run does not depend on pool total CPM. Of course the dumber ones are free to trade their total payout for reduced variance.

Quote from: Gwynbleidd on January 18, 2014, 09:46:59 AM
On my 680 CMP is lower than on normal version...

strange, my results:

Are u fuckin serious!?
You have the fastest CUDA miner, faster than 1GH and you can mine on YPOOL! Not shitty 1GH pool. where block found rate is lame low so profits too.
In future ofc it should be lower, but for now when devs jusy made amazing job he should get premium.

But anyway, does someone tried this version?

@edit
Scanned, no viruses.
On my 680 CMP is lower than on normal version...

Quote from: Ivsh1n on January 17, 2014, 04:37:31 PM
My ASUS GTX760-DC2OC-2GD5 get 1040 cpm with config 1200/7000 ! Amazing! Like 780!

You mean like 680 or 770...

sorry, but 6% fee is still too much, 1-3% is acceptable
modified version 0.3b with less donates (3% fee) - http://www.multiupload.nl/2L36XATGR5

My ASUS GTX760-DC2OC-2GD5 get 1040 cpm with config 1200/7000 ! Amazing! Like 780!

Quote from: abc123 on January 17, 2014, 03:26:54 AM
The memory bus width of GTX 680 is 256 bit, while GTX 480 is 384 bit. So GTX 480 may get slight higher performance.

I know, but when memory controler and RAM usage is low, so why?

with 0.3b version my asus 760 with 1176\6696 config have 970 cpm! wow!

Quote from: iami on January 17, 2014, 04:00:44 AM
collisions/min: 1065.5970 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1064.6135 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1063.7899 Shares total: 47
gtx480 win7 64bit i3-2130 v0.3b
=============================
collisions/min: 1063.1238 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.4000
New block data - height: 42642 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1062.6130 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1062.6987 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1063.4457 Shares total: 47
New block data - height: 42643 tx count: 1
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1064.1855 Shares total: 47

hi jami...
which gpu are you using??
can you tell us vendor and oem s/n?
ty!

collisions/min: 1065.5970 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1064.6135 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1063.7899 Shares total: 47
gtx480 win7 64bit i3-2130 v0.3b
=============================
collisions/min: 1063.1238 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.4000
New block data - height: 42642 tx count: 0
collisions/min: 1062.6130 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1062.6987 Shares total: 47
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1063.4457 Shares total: 47
New block data - height: 42643 tx count: 1
Rounds per second for GPU 0: 5.5000
collisions/min: 1064.1855 Shares total: 47

Quote from: Gwynbleidd on January 16, 2014, 09:46:42 PM
How this is possible that 480 have around 1030, when my 680 have 995-1000 and only 612MB (from MSI afterburner) VRAM works.

The memory bus width of GTX 680 is 256 bit, while GTX 480 is 384 bit. So GTX 480 may get slight higher performance.

GTX 570 - 1002~1004

How this is possible that 480 have around 1030, when my 680 have 995-1000 and only 612MB (from MSI afterburner) VRAM works.

A small portion turns out to be 20%, you made my day!

Quote from: pushme on January 16, 2014, 11:12:10 AM
modified version 0.3 with less donates (20% -> 5%) and only one donation pool - http://www.multiupload.nl/QQQ4NFRNPL
modified binary: PtsGPUz0.3_lessdonate.exe is protected against analyze

I have download this modified version and test it preliminarily, find it is ok. But still, use it at your own risks.