Quote from: gabainc on November 12, 2013, 05:55:32 AM

Quote from: testz on November 12, 2013, 05:29:31 AM

Quote from: glongsword on November 12, 2013, 05:28:25 AM

Quote from: gabainc on November 12, 2013, 05:26:59 AM
that is the default number of threads?

Default number is "hardware limit" I think byte called it.  So if you have 8 threads, 8.  If you have 16, 16.  Though it may have an upper bound at like 24??

For me it's work up to 32, from 33 it's crashes

how many cores does your machine have? and what have you found to be optimal?

32 cores, optimal I found 3 instances of miner with default (THREADS=HARDWARE)

How to set number of used cores?
(crashing on 2-core PC's with 2Gb, I want to set 1 core to use)

Quote from: vovik70 on November 12, 2013, 06:22:29 AM
где баланс pts  c  пула - 192.241.150.158 - Pq21TVcVXcGXYofxw6t11jaLDKzMKWckKD ?

Try this new IP: 162.243.67.4

my hash might say almost 20, but i get half as many accepts... almost 2 min between accepts and less than a min between with any of the other pools...

 где баланс pts  c  пула - 192.241.150.158 - Pq21TVcVXcGXYofxw6t11jaLDKzMKWckKD ?

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on November 12, 2013, 06:04:26 AM

Quote from: arubi on November 12, 2013, 06:00:24 AM

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

release the source for coyote

and when is the pool paying?

It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?

If anything, it will cause a distribution of hashing power amongst the pool, and better fees for miners as the pools will compete for miners.
Releasing the source for the pool will also be nice

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 06:10:03 AM

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on November 12, 2013, 06:04:26 AM

Quote from: arubi on November 12, 2013, 06:00:24 AM

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

release the source for coyote

and when is the pool paying?

It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?

I plan on releasing the source, but I also want diversification of hashing algorithms to compete.   Note: I spent less than a day optimizing the miner that FreeTrade produced, so there is no need for me to release my source when it serves as a bounty for other developers to get involved.   

Standards are nice.

Pool starts paying after 24 hours... though with the increased block production I may send out a payout when I get up in the morning.    I have to wait for the blocks we have found to mature.

I like standards too. Please don't keep the source closed for too long. This creates bad vibes.

24 hours it is. Hopefully sooner.

Quote from: atta2k15 on November 12, 2013, 06:15:07 AM
whats the difference between field balance and earned? two identical values

Earned is the life time earnings, never goes down.
Balance is what we owe you.
Paid is what we have paid you.

Balance = Earned - Paid.

whats the difference between field balance and earned? two identical values

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 06:10:03 AM

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on November 12, 2013, 06:04:26 AM

Quote from: arubi on November 12, 2013, 06:00:24 AM

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

release the source for coyote

and when is the pool paying?

It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?

I plan on releasing the source, but I also want diversification of hashing algorithms to compete.   Note: I spent less than a day optimizing the miner that FreeTrade produced, so there is no need for me to release my source when it serves as a bounty for other developers to get involved.   

Standards are nice.

Pool starts paying after 24 hours... though with the increased block production I may send out a payout when I get up in the morning.    I have to wait for the blocks we have found to mature.

Understood, but realize you just released a miner that effectively doubled everyone's hpm, of course people are going to flock to the new watering hole. :o It's the nature of the beast.

Quote from: BitMinerN8 on November 12, 2013, 06:04:26 AM

Quote from: arubi on November 12, 2013, 06:00:24 AM

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

release the source for coyote

and when is the pool paying?

It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?

I plan on releasing the source, but I also want diversification of hashing algorithms to compete.   Note: I spent less than a day optimizing the miner that FreeTrade produced, so there is no need for me to release my source when it serves as a bounty for other developers to get involved.   

Standards are nice.

Pool starts paying after 24 hours... though with the increased block production I may send out a payout when I get up in the morning.    I have to wait for the blocks we have found to mature.

Quote from: arubi on November 12, 2013, 06:00:24 AM

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

release the source for coyote

and when is the pool paying?

It would be great to have one client usable on multiple pools, for failover, and all that. Standards, like cgminer/bfgminer do in the BTC realm. Would releasing the source help move that direction?

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

Have you contacted any other pools to mine?  NetCodePool comes to mind as having a ton of options and may be open to accepting PTS...

Quote from: bytemaster on November 12, 2013, 05:59:06 AM
I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

release the source for coyote

and when is the pool paying?

I think we may be developing too much centralization in my pool!   We seem to have the majority of the hash power right now.   Should I do something to encourage diversification?

Quote from: testz on November 12, 2013, 05:29:31 AM

Quote from: glongsword on November 12, 2013, 05:28:25 AM

Quote from: gabainc on November 12, 2013, 05:26:59 AM
that is the default number of threads?

Default number is "hardware limit" I think byte called it.  So if you have 8 threads, 8.  If you have 16, 16.  Though it may have an upper bound at like 24??

For me it's work up to 32, from 33 it's crashes

how many cores does your machine have? and what have you found to be optimal?