Someone presenting an alternative perspective is highly VALUABLE. If everyone has the same perspective no one can learn anything. I really don't understand why SOME people hear react PERSONAL, EMOTIONAL and AGGRESSIVE/HATEFUL. On the other side always TWO PARTIES are necessary for an ad hominum centered discussion.

Perfect time to reference a document established decades ago: Netiquette!

Some of the conversations with ABL and CH have become a bit heated and sometimes personal. I get that we're all passionate about this technology and have a lot of time/resources invested.  However how we communicate and debate those that do not agree with our implementation and philosophies reflects on the community and the technology as a whole.

These are people already sold on the crypto industry. Some of the larger players we're hoping to attract aren't. That's when the real tough questions and challenges will start and I hope we can deal with them in a calm, reasoned, and methodical manner so as not to confirm their preconceived notions of the crypto community.