Could there a problem in the use of pro-rata valuation of Notes acquisition?
Let's say someone chooses to acquire 5 BTC worth of Notes a day for 20 or so consecutive days. And 5 BTC represents the highest on each of those days (with the next highest being around 1.5 or 2 BTC). If you throw out the highest and lowest on any one of those days, then the percent difference can be as high as 40+ percent, based on the angelshares explorer charts. Everyone else's Notes value would get substantially diluted by just one person. I'm not a statistician, so would somebody please verify my assessment. Actually there IS someone acquiring a relatively large number of Notes every day. I want to acquire some Notes, but I don't want my Notes value diluted by one whale buying daily. Anyone wanting 1 BTC or less of Notes may be hesitant to get them. Also, the donation list of agsexplorer.com doesn't seem to update on my Firefox browser unless I leave the page and return to it. Is anyone else experiencing this behavior?