Author Topic: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor  (Read 24147 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2013, 05:01:50 pm »
updated
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2013, 05:53:13 pm »

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

I have a custom script that prevents 'watch' from abusing resources.
the miner runs as an idle process on linux by default.

Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2013, 06:48:47 pm »
I don't believe these older xeons have the AES instruction set.


4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2013, 11:28:36 pm »
They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).
« Last Edit: December 21, 2013, 11:32:33 pm by Delinquency »

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2013, 05:22:11 am »
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2013, 10:42:31 am »
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #21 on: December 22, 2013, 11:17:18 pm »
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads

Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2013, 12:47:59 am »
Can't believe how expensive that LGA 1366 hardware has gotten- looks like I could sell my 2 year old computer (i7 950) for more than I paid for it...

Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline Djemi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2013, 01:32:33 pm »

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2013, 07:03:45 pm »
Quote
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Please fix:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2013, 09:31:10 pm »
Snagged one for $69 from a wholesale dedi host :S
DUAL L5639 OPTIMIZED

Offline salvo0097

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2013, 09:42:52 pm »
Show di you optimize the server. In windows server 2008 r2 it runs from 4.7 band 5 hpm.

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #27 on: December 23, 2013, 09:43:52 pm »
I'm using Linux, it always has much better performance.

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #28 on: December 24, 2013, 10:22:22 am »
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #29 on: December 24, 2013, 12:22:11 pm »
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...

two blocks from this baby enough?