Author Topic: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor  (Read 24431 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« on: December 19, 2013, 02:21:07 pm »
hello

i propose to open a thread where we can put our result by processor

i'm starting :

AMD Phenom II X4 B97 3.2 Ghz  : 0.4hs /min 8 thread

AMD Phenom II  X4 820  2.87 Ghz  : 0.4 hs /min 8 thread

AMD Phenom X4 965  0.58388289  hs /min

i5 2430M 0.83 hpm

 I5 2500K  : 1.1

My i5 2500k stock clock is running at 1.3 H/m. (idle process)

x2 Intel Xeon L5420 @ 1.22 H/m

i5 2.4ghz  1.523

AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz 1.58HPM

i5 [email protected] ~ 1.6hash/min

i5 3570k: 1.68 hs /min

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU           X5650  @ 2.67GHz  4 thread  1.75   hs /min

aws c1.8xlarge  Intel Xeon-family         /     1.8 hpm

3570k, at 4.2GHz,  1.93 hashes/min.

i5 2500K @ 4.1 GHz = 1.957 hash/min on the mmcpool

Intel i7-3612QM 2.10Ghz  :  2.17 hs/min 8 thread

Core i7 3770K   : 2.1

fx-6300 @ 3.5GHz - 2.2 hpm

i5-2500k @3.3 GHz (not overclocked) 2,2 HPM

E5620 => 2.3 hpm , 2.4 hpm (8 gb ram)

i7 3610qm - 2,4 (8 thread)

amd fx-8320 2.44

i7-3630QM : 2.48

i7 2600 2.56 hpm

E3 1230 V2  2.9-3.1HPM 8threads

i7-2600 => 2.8 hpm , 2.9 hpm (16 gb ram)

Mac OS X 10.8 x64 (mmcminer): Core i7 3720QM 2.6Ghz - 8 threads, 3.00 hpm.

AMD 8 Core FX-8350 - Windows 8 x64 = 2.95 hpm / Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 3.3 hpm

E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz => 2.9 hpm, 3.1 hpm (32 gb ram)

3930k @ 3.5Ghz  : 3.09

E3-1230 V3 : hashespermin" : 3.09464864

i7-2600k  3.18347856

E5-2650L(Engineering Sample),Max 2.1Ghz(turbo boost mode),  3,2 hpm
3770k @4,2GHz 3,8 h/m Win7 64bit


AMD 3850 @ 4.4 ghz 3.55 hpm, total cost of build 380$

[email protected] GHz - 4

[email protected] GHz - 4.1

4770k @ 5ghz  4.1


Double Opteron 4356  4.56202554,

2 x L5639 (24 thread) : 5.3 h/m

 i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz - 5.3 hpm

aws c3.4xlarge  Intel Xeon E5-2680    /     5.4 hpm

Dual L5639(total 12 core 24 thread ) =>  5.5 hpm (24 gb ram) => 24 thread

DUAL L5639 OPTIMIZED   6.2 hpm

x2 [email protected] ~ 6.8hash/min(-t 256)

Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8,5 Hs/min 32 threads

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm

aws c3.8xlarge  Intel Xeon E5-2680      /  10.6 hpm

EC2 cc2.8xlarge E5-2670 @ 2.6GHz (32 vCPU/Windows): ~ 10hpm

Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm




4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0


il you like this tread you can giveaway  MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF


in a table display  http://mmcwiki.com/memorycoin_mining_intel_hardware_comparison

« Last Edit: January 02, 2014, 02:55:39 pm by trankil »
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline Djemi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #1 on: December 19, 2013, 02:35:08 pm »
2 x L5639 (24 thread) : 5.3 h/m

Offline ptsomsk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #2 on: December 19, 2013, 02:53:55 pm »

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #3 on: December 19, 2013, 03:22:23 pm »
ok i update thread
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline chida

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #4 on: December 19, 2013, 04:03:36 pm »
i7 3610qm - 2,4 (8 thread)
BTC: 12A5tZgivCa7BVF4YbQdtSedFzanpCbupb
MMC: MBayoLj9WEWTsCk8n45G37tDSSJP2Dd9k5
PTS: PiVUjNkwk6VKrKWCMtA7NkqFhfkqR5pnCS

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #5 on: December 19, 2013, 04:18:09 pm »
Does your RAM Bus speed make a difference in H/m?

My i5 2500k stock clock is running at 1.3 H/m. (idle process)
x2 Intel Xeon L5420 @ 1.22 H/m
ARM Samsung Exynos 4412 Prime @ 0.09 H/m

Offline jorneyflair

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #6 on: December 19, 2013, 05:04:06 pm »
E3 1230 V2  2.9-3.1HPM 8threads
E3 1230 V3  3.0-3.3HPM 8threads


Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #7 on: December 19, 2013, 05:21:34 pm »
AMD 3850 @ 4.4 ghz 3.55 hpm, total cost of build 380$
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline Montaxx

  • Moderator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 76
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #8 on: December 19, 2013, 09:26:01 pm »
Core 2 Duo E7200 @ 2.8 GHz - 0.3hpm

Offline cass

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4317
  • /(┬.┬)\
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #9 on: December 19, 2013, 09:32:32 pm »
aws c3.8xlarge  Intel Xeon E5-2680      /  10.6 hpm
aws c3.4xlarge  Intel Xeon E5-2680    /     5.4 hpm
aws c1.8xlarge  Intel Xeon-family         /     1.8 hpm
« Last Edit: December 19, 2013, 09:35:07 pm by cassiopaia »
█║▌║║█  - - -  The quieter you become, the more you are able to hear  - - -  █║▌║║█

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #10 on: December 20, 2013, 01:08:44 pm »
updated
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline chida

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 77
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #11 on: December 20, 2013, 08:04:35 pm »
BTC: 12A5tZgivCa7BVF4YbQdtSedFzanpCbupb
MMC: MBayoLj9WEWTsCk8n45G37tDSSJP2Dd9k5
PTS: PiVUjNkwk6VKrKWCMtA7NkqFhfkqR5pnCS

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #12 on: December 21, 2013, 03:32:23 am »
AMD 8 Core FX-8350 - Windows 8 x64 = 2.95 hpm / Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 3.3 hpm
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #13 on: December 21, 2013, 04:10:15 am »

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400
« Last Edit: December 21, 2013, 04:23:19 am by Delinquency »

Offline Djemi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #14 on: December 21, 2013, 07:13:47 am »

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #15 on: December 21, 2013, 05:01:50 pm »
updated
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #16 on: December 21, 2013, 05:53:13 pm »

4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?

I have a custom script that prevents 'watch' from abusing resources.
the miner runs as an idle process on linux by default.

Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #17 on: December 21, 2013, 06:48:47 pm »
I don't believe these older xeons have the AES instruction set.


4x 4770k @ 5ghz  16.0

mainboard?

Eh, that must price inefficient for $ per H/m (fades)


---

Dual Xeon L5639 - "hashespermin" : 6.18893583 with version 85400

I have the same config with 2 x5639 getting only 4.5 h/m now... Where is the trick?
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #18 on: December 21, 2013, 11:28:36 pm »
They do not. Dual L5639 just have a ton of GHz (24 v-cores).
« Last Edit: December 21, 2013, 11:32:33 pm by Delinquency »

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #19 on: December 22, 2013, 05:22:11 am »
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #20 on: December 22, 2013, 10:42:31 am »
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #21 on: December 22, 2013, 11:17:18 pm »
Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads

Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #22 on: December 23, 2013, 12:47:59 am »
Can't believe how expensive that LGA 1366 hardware has gotten- looks like I could sell my 2 year old computer (i7 950) for more than I paid for it...

Dual Xeon 5670 AES-NI @ 8 Hs/min 32 threads
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline Djemi

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #23 on: December 23, 2013, 01:32:33 pm »

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #24 on: December 23, 2013, 07:03:45 pm »
Quote
2x Xeon 8 Core E5-2650 2.00 GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Please fix:
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 10.1 hpm
Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 0 @ 2.00GHz - Ubuntu 12.04 x64 = 8.2 hpm
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #25 on: December 23, 2013, 09:31:10 pm »
Snagged one for $69 from a wholesale dedi host :S
DUAL L5639 OPTIMIZED

Offline salvo0097

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #26 on: December 23, 2013, 09:42:52 pm »
Show di you optimize the server. In windows server 2008 r2 it runs from 4.7 band 5 hpm.

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #27 on: December 23, 2013, 09:43:52 pm »
I'm using Linux, it always has much better performance.

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #28 on: December 24, 2013, 10:22:22 am »
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #29 on: December 24, 2013, 12:22:11 pm »
I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...

two blocks from this baby enough?

Offline jpeggt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #30 on: December 24, 2013, 01:34:05 pm »
not sure why, but my fx-8350 @ 4.4ghz is only getting 2.8hpm (running ubuntu 13.10)  ???

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #31 on: December 24, 2013, 01:40:41 pm »
updated
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #32 on: December 24, 2013, 01:57:21 pm »

I'm sceptic that Linux can double the hs/min alone...

two blocks from this baby enough?

I trust you, I'm only saying that this (huge) difference can't be only referred to the Os efficiency.
I own a Dual Xeon 5670 and I'm getting about 8/9 hs/min under windows.

Maybe the problem is in the windows client...

Offline BigChase

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #33 on: December 24, 2013, 04:15:13 pm »
MemoryCoin2 Calc: http://bitcoind.url.ph/memorycoin2_calc.html

URL now redirects to a Russian hosting service. :(

Offline badbonez

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 50
    • View Profile
MMC: MQ4EA85nnZwytrcqx9rJSpDWVTSXaxfqmc

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #35 on: December 24, 2013, 11:14:10 pm »
not sure why, but my fx-8350 @ 4.4ghz is only getting 2.8hpm (running ubuntu 13.10)  ???

I got that issue with one of my mining builds too, It's the mainboard. Buy a better mobo!

Offline jpeggt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #36 on: December 24, 2013, 11:21:07 pm »
not sure why, but my fx-8350 @ 4.4ghz is only getting 2.8hpm (running ubuntu 13.10)  ???

I got that issue with one of my mining builds too, It's the mainboard. Buy a better mobo!

I'm using this motherboard "msi 990fxa-gd65". Which I not too fond of since it will only boot with a graphics card attached. Is there a better am3 board you'd recommend?

Offline agran

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 93
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #37 on: December 24, 2013, 11:25:50 pm »
Is there a better am3 board you'd recommend?
I have ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3 and my AMD 8 Core FX-8350 4.0 Ghz give 3.3 hpm.
MMC: MEKdGj95hNjuYn8xiw4iz1iQUQGA47UBMB | BTC: 1agran1xQ4Nwiqv1qegBDF6kqZdfESMUG

Offline jpeggt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #38 on: December 24, 2013, 11:32:56 pm »
Is there a better am3 board you'd recommend?
I have ASUS M5A78L-M/USB3 and my AMD 8 Core FX-8350 4.0 Ghz give 3.3 hpm.

Interesting, that was the board I was going to buy, but decided not to since it has the 760G chipset and everything I read said to get a board with 990 if you want to do any overclocking. I also have a Asrock 980DE3/U3S3 that has a fx-6300 in it, I did try running my fx-8350 on that board but it was very unstable, even at stock clock.

Offline nomullet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #39 on: December 25, 2013, 07:08:27 am »
M5A 78L-MLX Plus 54$ at newegg.
M9ycAeveS8hhQtok6xgLPMEpGsZxFkcgzT

Offline TheBeardedMann

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #40 on: December 26, 2013, 05:36:38 am »
i5 2500K @ 4.1 GHz = 1.957 hash/min on the mmcpool

Offline jpeggt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #41 on: December 26, 2013, 06:24:47 am »
i5 2500K @ 4.1 GHz = 1.957 hash/min on the mmcpool

with mmcpool mining on ubuntu 13.10 I'm getting this:

fx-8350 @ 4GHz - 3 hpm
fx-6300 @ 3.5GHz - 2.2 hpm
i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz - 5.3 hpm

Offline s4l1h

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 122
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #42 on: December 26, 2013, 12:13:21 pm »
Tested Ubuntu +Debian (8 thread)
E3-1245 V2 @ 3.40GHz => 2.9 hpm, 3.1 hpm (32 gb ram)
E5620 => 2.3 hpm , 2.4 hpm (8 gb ram)
i7-2600 => 2.8 hpm , 2.9 hpm (16 gb ram)
8 core AMD Opteron  4171  => 0.9 hpm (14 gb ram)
8 core X5650 => 1.5 hpm (4 gb ram)

Dual L5639(total 12 core 24 thread ) =>  5.5 hpm (24 gb ram) => 24 thread



Tested mac os x (8 thread)
i7-3770 => 3.4 hpm,3.5 hpm (8 gb ram)
« Last Edit: December 26, 2013, 09:09:38 pm by s4l1h »

Offline glitchboy

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 55
    • View Profile
    • MMCPool.com
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #43 on: December 26, 2013, 01:22:18 pm »
Mac OS X 10.8 x64 (mmcminer): Core i7 3720QM 2.6Ghz - 8 threads, 3.00 hpm.
MMCPool.com - MemoryCoin 2.0 Pool

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #44 on: December 26, 2013, 01:31:08 pm »
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz

Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm

Offline salvo0097

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #45 on: December 26, 2013, 01:33:29 pm »
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz

Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm
GPU ?

Offline jpeggt

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #46 on: December 26, 2013, 01:36:37 pm »
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz

Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm

You've got MMC to mine on a gpu? ???

Offline Gwynbleidd

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 35
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #47 on: December 26, 2013, 01:39:34 pm »
3770k @4,2GHz 3,8 h/m Win7 64bit

Offline kbhutto

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 27
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #48 on: December 26, 2013, 05:14:11 pm »
EC2 cc2.8xlarge E5-2670 @ 2.6GHz (32 vCPU/Windows): ~ 10hpm

[17:09:31] Found share ...43e17022aa393528: submitting
[17:09:31] Stats: 10.095 hash/min
[17:09:31] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
[17:09:34] Found solution - 8427 / 1968 / 2552121027
[17:09:35] Found solution - 2918 / 1968 / 2626787225
[17:09:37] Found share ...e6282adbcfa91429: submitting
[17:09:37] Stats: 10.068 hash/min
[17:09:37] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted
[17:09:39] Found solution - 620 / 1968 / 4175850305
[17:09:40] Found solution - 4261 / 1968 / 4253120609
[17:09:42] Found solution - 856 / 1968 / 181299850
[17:09:42] Found solution - 14702 / 1968 / 2551600901
[17:09:42] Found solution - 15246 / 1968 / 473877606
[17:09:43] Found solution - 3519 / 1968 / 2346623495
[17:09:43] Found share ...a3f785b287402476: submitting
[17:09:43] Stats: 10.068 hash/min
[17:09:44] PROOF OF WORK RESULT: Accepted

Offline hayer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #49 on: December 27, 2013, 06:11:17 am »
x2  E5-2650  2.0 32 thread  only 3

[23:05:36] Found solution - 3441 / 1968 / 1420314637
[23:05:41] Stats: 3.256 hash/min
[23:08:07] Stats: 3.270 hash/min
[23:08:26] Stats: 3.276 hash/min
[23:08:44] Stats: 3.274 hash/min
[23:09:02] Stats: 3.281 hash/min
[23:09:21] Stats: 3.282 hash/min
[23:09:40] Stats: 3.276 hash/min

Do you think have prolem ? I run on virtual .

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #50 on: December 27, 2013, 10:07:49 am »
Updating:

With minerd I'm getting 8,5 hs/min win8 dual xeon 5670 Aes-ni

Offline etrock

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #51 on: December 29, 2013, 02:48:26 am »
i5 [email protected] ~ 1.6hash/min
x2 [email protected] ~ 6.8hash/min(-t 256)
[email protected] ~ 0.375h/min

Offline badbonez

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 50
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #52 on: December 29, 2013, 02:54:36 am »
Macbook Pro 2012 Retna
i7 @ 2.6ghz, 4 threads
 ~0.76 h/m.

Didn't run it long though, wasn't able to cool the CPU to a reasonable level during the run.  Just wanted to see what it would do.

MMC: MQ4EA85nnZwytrcqx9rJSpDWVTSXaxfqmc

Offline stalemate

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 138
  • Memorycoin CMO
    • View Profile
    • Coaex Precious Metals
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #53 on: December 29, 2013, 11:27:54 am »
i5-2500k @3.3 GHz (not overclocked)
Windows 7 x64

2.2 HPM

additional info: CPU-MB temp. is around 43-48 C while running 24/7
Coaex Precious Metals - Cryptocoin Gold and Silver Bullion
Memorycoin Chief Marketing Officer - Voting Address: MVTEcmoa78Tg5gRHzfjk5y5eaBxzP6GEYQ

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #54 on: December 29, 2013, 06:36:34 pm »
updated
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #55 on: December 29, 2013, 11:22:34 pm »
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz

Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm

 :'(

Offline tomorrow

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 173
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #56 on: January 01, 2014, 09:07:16 am »
AMD A10-6800K 4.1GHz 1.58HPM
Vote for seraphim to lead a team of supporters as MMC CSO
Send 0.00000001 to MVTEcsoL9GvfezMUgEDnhr7ioRAsByuTAv

Offline reorder

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 400
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #57 on: January 01, 2014, 09:50:45 am »
For the sake of completeness, or just for lulz

Radeon 7870GE stock clocks - 10hpm
Radeon 280X - 15hpm

 :'(
Don't be sad, it is New Year after all. Anyway, you are better off spending $200 on Radeon than on AWS: in the end you will still have Radeon to play videogames!  And I hope AWS will stop annoying those who need it for real work with ridiculous limits.

Offline sceneboss

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #58 on: January 01, 2014, 10:29:53 am »
macbook pro 13.3" retina haswell i5 2.4ghz

[12:18:28] Stats: 1.523 hash/min

Offline trankil

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 38
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #59 on: January 02, 2014, 02:55:36 pm »
updated
MMC : MTxecTRmb6Gs4wu4jsftJSHSuowiV3o6tF

PTS : PZt3qLFhQeber5NFjjv3ith813oF6zBwnU

Offline luckye

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #60 on: January 11, 2014, 09:20:00 am »

updated

Can you pls change the score of my dual 5670 from 8,5 to 11,2 ?

Thanks

Offline PTPunto

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #61 on: February 15, 2014, 11:22:46 am »
Hi,

Intel i5 4670k @ 4.6Ghz with AV2 = 14.5 HPM
« Last Edit: February 15, 2014, 11:24:53 am by PTPunto »

Offline toonces

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 39
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #62 on: February 16, 2014, 04:01:29 am »
Dell PowerEdge R620
Dual Socket E5-2650 2Ghz 8 core 20M cache with 128GB RAM OS 64Bit Precise

MMC Agg. SPM: 25.937, HPM: 26.591; Rnds C/I: 50616/11839, Don. C/I: 594/138; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 25.937/0.8333, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 26.592/0.8310 51210 rnds AV=1, ART=72203


OpenStack 16 VCPUs 32 GB RAM

MMC Agg. SPM: 21.829, HPM: 22.198; Rnds C/I: 44284/6043, Don. C/I: 474/48; Cfg/Wkr SPM: 21.829/1.3870, Cfg/Wkr HPM: 22.198/1.3873 44758 rnds AV=2, ART=43248
« Last Edit: February 16, 2014, 04:14:41 am by toonces »

Offline ManeBjorn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #63 on: February 16, 2014, 04:27:41 am »
AMD A8-5557M Quad Core
3 threads running Yam M7m
1.79 hpm
Tips Appreciated MMC | MQotia5NmKTsaXXPaN8hw2ze3Z1DNwi39s
https://www.multibet.io/index.php?ref=ManeBjorn

Offline MaxPWR

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 221
  • Sink 2UR Source
    • View Profile
    • Max's Power Plant
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #64 on: February 16, 2014, 05:23:38 am »
Please also ask for power usage information (if available) for both idle mining, along with hpm.  See:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2485.msg30783#msg30783
You can't stop the signal, Mal. Everything goes somewhere, and I go everywhere.

PWR UP: MAXVTEoYhDfWJjvkNm2ZmUhHpYbsPYuybg

Offline ManeBjorn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 174
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #65 on: February 16, 2014, 06:11:29 am »
I like the idea but I am not sure how to answer that on my end.
I get electricity for free.  The farm my in-laws own has a methane electricity generation plant that basically makes electricity from poop.  I don't have a meter to see what I am pulling from the wall either but once I get a few things done and save up I can get one a find out how much I am pulling.

Please also ask for power usage information (if available) for both idle mining, along with hpm.  See:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2485.msg30783#msg30783
Tips Appreciated MMC | MQotia5NmKTsaXXPaN8hw2ze3Z1DNwi39s
https://www.multibet.io/index.php?ref=ManeBjorn

Offline bcboy

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #66 on: March 18, 2014, 05:05:43 pm »
At the lower end:

Core2Duo e8400, 3.0GHz, 0.38 hpm with mmcminer

i5-520M, 2.4GHz, ~2.3-2.4 hpm with yam

I do what I can...

Offline filo1992

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #67 on: March 28, 2014, 02:45:43 pm »
hello, I have an i7 3630qm, but I can not do more than 1.4 hpm undermine what should I do??

Offline p.hawks

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #68 on: May 15, 2014, 08:07:21 pm »
Dual E5-2650 Xeon (Mac Pro 3,1) OS X 10.9.2
mmcminer 12 threads gets me 1.3 hash/min

It will sometimes spike (in the terminal window), but it doesn't get much above this for the value shown on mmcpool.com

Does anyone know if these results are typical?  Also, is there an optima code for my machine? I have 24GB of RAM, and mmcminer uses 1, and I don't see a way to let/tell it to use more

Offline Delinquency

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 370
    • View Profile
Re: memorycoin Hashpermin VS processor
« Reply #69 on: May 15, 2014, 11:14:56 pm »
Dual E5-2650 Xeon (Mac Pro 3,1) OS X 10.9.2
mmcminer 12 threads gets me 1.3 hash/min

It will sometimes spike (in the terminal window), but it doesn't get much above this for the value shown on mmcpool.com

Does anyone know if these results are typical?  Also, is there an optima code for my machine? I have 24GB of RAM, and mmcminer uses 1, and I don't see a way to let/tell it to use more

Download YAM for mining. (find it on mmc-square)