[ANN] [STABLE!] mmc.xpool.xram.co - First Memorycoin Pool

[balthazr]

hi Killer,

how long does the upgrade take? it's only upgrade the front web server or also mining server? will minging will stop while upgrading?

[KillerByte]

Well, I also have another question. Is this coin can utilize much more memory than 1 GB? If I have 32 GB could I use them all?

It should only use 1GB no matter how many threads you have.

I will now address the maximum threads limit problem... do my best to fix it. Stay tuned!

EDIT: Pool just crashed. I will fix!!!

[Firefly]

Well, I also have another question. Is this coin can utilize much more memory than 1 GB? If I have 32 GB could I use them all?

[KillerByte]

killerbyte, this is GREAT Xmas's present ever!

tks

well, there will still be bugs to fix, so dont get TOO excited...

[balthazr]

killerbyte, this is GREAT Xmas's present ever!

tks

[KillerByte]

Server upgrade starts now!

[Firefly]

you guys may try to compile on windows with mingw, i;ve done before with compile bitcoin and litecoin on windows, just for practice only.
google for compile bitcoin/litecoin on windows, it may be the same with this

>src/main.cpp:1925: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
>src/main.cpp:5723: error: integer constant is too large for 'long' type
> 1925    if(vtx[0].GetValueOut()!=73366415666531){
> 5723    int64 bottomOfThePollAmount=9223372036854775807;

That's what I mean. Excuse me, I'm not a programmer.

[balthazr]

you guys may try to compile on windows with mingw, i;ve done before with compile bitcoin and litecoin on windows, just for practice only.
google for compile bitcoin/litecoin on windows, it may be the same with this

[Firefly]

We Need Windows Version!!!!!

Really it's so. We don't want to assemble/compile, make/install, errors with missing libs and other linux brainfu*king stuff.

[rambo]

We Need Windows Version!!!!!

[balthazr]

tks moutujan,

still have some errors, but i give up, will ask the provider to re-install to ubuntu one, that one i'm familiar with. 

tks for your support

[mutoujian]

@moutain: makefile.my:150: *** missing separator 

which version of centos are you using, i'm currently on centos 5.10, that's bad 

you cat get it from  http://pan.baidu.com/s/1o64mIqI 

[balthazr]

@moutain: makefile.my:150: *** missing separator 

which version of centos are you using, i'm currently on centos 5.10, that's bad 

[KillerByte]

Immediately after I start the miner it works for about 2 minutes.  Here's an example:

submit: 020d527e6d7ae2dbe41fdcb2ac1892ed349ef426356a2680fbac1d5ff371d2ea
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:07:28 | SHARES: 1 (100.0% | 52.9/h), VL: 1 (100.0%), RJ: 0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 8206 / 1968 / 3410774748
hash generated - 3065 / 1968 / 3346170544
hash generated - 1418 / 1968 / 4147674291
[MASTER] work received
connecting to 162.243.216.74:1339
system:111

It submits a couple of shares within the first minute or 2 then seems to get disconnected.  After that it will submit more shares, but won't receive any response, and won't work until I start again.  Checking if anyone else has this issue.

Thanks for your insight on this.

Hi, KillerByte, Thanks for you effort for the pool

I got following output in my miner, it looks like it's sending the same share within a short time. The first is accepted and the second is rejected. Does that mean some duplicate work is in different threads? Maybe you can fix it to make the miner more efficient.


hash generated - 1921 / 1968 / 4265226673
hash generated - 5552 / 1968 / 3603954008
submit: 0c4102809f907d3fc6e995f020e7dbd2fdda66f26f87ecbfa63815c3c0f281ed
[MASTER] submitted share -> SHARE
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:32:58 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 144.0/h), VL: 2 (100.0%), RJ:
0 (0.0%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 9188 / 1968 / 1831948737
hash generated - 9578 / 1968 / 3607491106
hash generated - 8598 / 1968 / 811137229
hash generated - 1921 / 1968 / 4265226673
hash generated - 5552 / 1968 / 3603954008
submit: 0c4102809f907d3fc6e995f020e7dbd2fdda66f26f87ecbfa63815c3c0f281ed
[MASTER] submitted share -> REJECTED
[STATS] 2013-12-25 02:33:16 | SHARES: 2 (100.0% | 105.9/h), VL: 2 (66.7%), RJ: 1
 (33.3%), ST: 0 (0.0%)
hash generated - 2666 / 1968 / 3113632687
hash generated - 13359 / 1968 / 3249895379

Different keys are aupposed to be sent to each client, maybe there is a problem with the key pool for memorycoin?

[smokim11]

pool down again?

It seems that way.

Guys the System:111 error means that the pool is down but also means everything is working correctly except a valid connection to the pool.

I think this should be solved after server migration in a few hours so sit tight and wait until the new server comes in.