Author Topic: Test Net for Advanced Users  (Read 263681 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
init8 witness node seems to be down.
Yes. I think puppies can vote it out.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline clayop

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2033
    • View Profile
    • Bitshares Korea
  • BitShares: clayop
init8 witness node seems to be down.
Bitshares Korea - http://www.bitshares.kr
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcube
Yes the new seed is working.  I am in sync.  Thank you!

Can you help to vote bitcube in?

  "id": "1.6.624",
  "witness_account": "1.2.8206",
« Last Edit: September 20, 2015, 05:06:40 am by cube »
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies

Is the seed node '104.236.118.105:1776' working?

Looks like its down.  you can use 188.165.233.53:1776
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline cube

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1404
  • Bit by bit, we will get there!
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: bitcube
Hi guys,

My witness_node was stuck and I had to replay the chain.  But it is not replaying.  I am getting zero head block and the console says:

Code: [Select]
291001ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
292001ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
293000ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
294001ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
295000ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
296000ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
297000ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
298001ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)
299000ms th_a       witness.cpp:179               block_production_loo ] Not producing block because production is disabled until we receive a recent block (see: --enable-stale-production)



Is the seed node '104.236.118.105:1776' working?
ID: bitcube
bitcube is a dedicated witness and committe member. Please vote for bitcube.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Where are you pulling all this vote info from abit?
https://github.com/abitmore/graphene/tree/test3-patch1
I added some logs, and modified config.ini so that the program saves console output to a file.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
Where are you pulling all this vote info from abit? 
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline lakerta06

Maybe that whale is bm. Isnt he handling some whale's stake? Maybe he wants to run some tests with init delegates.

Just speculating though. Dont take me too serious

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Looks like all witnesses other than the init ones are voted out..

Here is a summary of all votes. Note: the number before 'total' is 'vote_id' but not 'witness_id', the number after 'total' is how many CORE's * 100000.
Code: [Select]
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 0 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 1 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 2 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 3 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 4 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 5 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 6 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 7 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 8 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 9 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 10 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:04 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 11 total 2074182535280
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 623 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 1062 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 1526 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 1530 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 1537 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:04 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 1624 total 1217059482021
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 2103 total 1314652386072
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 3967 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 4231 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 4948 total 1296529654343
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 5267 total 2153652707602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 5268 total 1314652386072
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 5269 total 8411563602
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 5270 total 92919771170
2015-09-19T19:00:09 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] 5271 total 79470172322

Another strange thing, the 73M CORE whale seems doesn't vote for anyone, but the stake is counted "voting".
Code: [Select]
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] stake_account 1.2.47247 voting_stake 7309344543864 num_witness 0
                    db_maint.cpp:437
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] d._witness_count_histogram_buffer[0] = 7309354543864
                db_maint.cpp:458
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] d._total_voting_stake = 7309354543864                       db_maint.cpp:472
not like this (although same num_witness=0)
Code: [Select]
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] stake_account 1.2.38993 voting_stake 8411563602 num_witness 0
                       db_maint.cpp:437
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] stake_account 1.2.38993 voting_stake 8411563602 vote_for 5269 total 8411563602                      db_maint.cpp:444
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] d._witness_count_histogram_buffer[0] = 7318105091732
                db_maint.cpp:458
2015-09-19T19:00:02 th_a:invoke handle_block           operator() ] d._total_voting_stake = 7318105091732                       db_maint.cpp:472
« Last Edit: September 19, 2015, 07:30:47 pm by abit »
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
It looks like there is a bug that shows total votes as 0 until you have been voted into active status.  dele-puppy is still showing 0 votes as well.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline Riverhead

To clarify:

Should the proxy vote be on "puppies" or "dele-puppy"?

Above it lists both.

puppies please

So I voted 70k CORE for riverhead  and it appeared to work but I see no votes on the delegate account..

Code: [Select]
get_witness riverhead
{
  "id": "1.6.3968",
  "witness_account": "1.2.67253",
  "last_aslot": 0,
  "signing_key": "GPH6BJYGHftujnbttFFKX6YacnvsMd4sbJrbucg682GiU4vmXHTik",
  "vote_id": "1:3967",
  "total_votes": 0,
  "url": "",
  "total_missed": 0
}
unlocked >>>

I noticed bitcube is on puppies' list and also does not have any votes. Any ideas?

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
I'm updated to voting for 23 witnesses.

I also upgraded dele-puppy to a committee member so we can see if that helps.
No use with current code and that whale. See my post https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17962.msg237551.html#msg237551 and this issue https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/330.
Hope that devs will come and explain more.

Yeah.  Sadly I think you're right.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
To clarify:

Should the proxy vote be on "puppies" or "dele-puppy"?

Above it lists both.

puppies please
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
I'm updated to voting for 23 witnesses.

I also upgraded dele-puppy to a committee member so we can see if that helps.
No use with current code and that whale. See my post https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17962.msg237551.html#msg237551 and this issue https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/330.
Hope that devs will come and explain more.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
I'm updated to voting for 23 witnesses.
Code: [Select]
bitcube
calabiyau
dele-puppy
delegate-1.lafona
delegate-clayop
fox
in.abit
init0
init1
init10
init2
init3
init4
init5
init6
init7
init8
init9
riverhead
roadscape
spartako
wackou
xeldal

I also upgraded dele-puppy to a committee member so we can see if that helps.
Committee members have to be voted for separately ..

The max delegate amount int the config is the absolut max allowed ever .. not the current amount to be used afaik