BTS supply growth -- worker voting

[roadscape]

Fee pool balances w/ approximate BTS value now shown at the bottom of http://cryptofresh.com/reserve

Total BTA fees collected: approx 2,550,584 BTS

Can we have another graph that takes into consideration of accumated fees and fee pools?  Perhaps with an overlay?

Yeah, that would be nice to have! The only issue is there's no API to get accumulated fees at a specific point in time, so it requires either a custom index or hacks to graphene core.

[cube]

Fee pool balances w/ approximate BTS value now shown at the bottom of http://cryptofresh.com/reserve

Total BTA fees collected: approx 2,550,584 BTS

Can we have another graph that takes into consideration of accumated fees and fee pools?  Perhaps with an overlay?

[roadscape]

Fee pool balances w/ approximate BTS value now shown at the bottom of http://cryptofresh.com/reserve

Total BTA fees collected: approx 2,550,584 BTS

[roadscape]

Does this graph reflect the funds held in the following places:

1. Fee Pools
2. Cash Back VBO of committee account?

1. No
2. No, but committee-account has no vbo's yet:

Code: [Select]

get_vesting_balances committee-account
[]

[maqifrnswa]

Does this graph reflect the funds held in the following places:

1. Fee Pools
2. Cash Back VBO of committee account?

mine doesn't, it's just what the budget object says is in the reserve fund at that time stamp

[bytemaster]

Does this graph reflect the funds held in the following places:

1. Fee Pools
2. Cash Back VBO of committee account?

[roadscape]

Saw this too late, just wrote a script to do the same thing. I can turn it off now1

it matches:
http://cryptofresh.com/reserve
so I don't need to run my script!

If you pulled the reserve fund numbers from the budget objects, I believe it does include BTA feeds since the reserve pool is bumped with BTA fees every maintenance cycle (am I correct?)

Nice.. matching data is always good

The budget objects measure only BTS holdings. Until we liquidate the collected BTA's into BTS and recycle it, BTA holdings are not reflected in this chart. Only the committee-account can access the accumulated BTA fees, as it is the issuer of all of them.

[maqifrnswa]

Saw this too late, just wrote a script to do the same thing. I can turn it off now1

it matches:
http://cryptofresh.com/reserve
so I don't need to run my script!

If you pulled the reserve fund numbers from the budget objects, I believe it does include BTA feeds since the reserve pool is bumped with BTA fees every maintenance cycle (am I correct?)

[roadscape]

If I understand the 'refund400k' worker, this worker basically recycles pay back into the reserve pool, meaning that we arent actually paying anyone.  The purpose of this is so that this is the cutoff point, where all workers below it will not get paid.  Is this correct?

If this is the case then the current state looks good to me, we really arent paying any workers other than funding a pool to use to pay for UIA fees so that people can use assest without paying high fees, which seems liek a fine idea.

Correct! It all goes back into the reserve pool.

Also: http://cryptofresh.com/reserve - keep in mind it doesn't take into account accumulated BTA fees

I think we need to make this take those accumulated BTA fees into account.  Because really they do not represent inflation in BTS, right?  But they make the graph look like BTS is inflating.

Does the graph really look that way? The network has earned 700k BTS since launch, and we're just getting started.. and yes accumulated BTA's are not inflation. Right now there is a worker funding the fee pools with BTS, but in the long run the committee will trade the collected assets back to BTS and use them for funding the fee pool.

[Ander]

Also: http://cryptofresh.com/reserve - keep in mind it doesn't take into account accumulated BTA fees

I think we need to make this take those accumulated BTA fees into account.  Because really they do not represent inflation in BTS, right?  But they make the graph look like BTS is inflating.

[Ander]

If I understand the 'refund400k' worker, this worker basically recycles pay back into the reserve pool, meaning that we arent actually paying anyone.  The purpose of this is so that this is the cutoff point, where all workers below it will not get paid.  Is this correct?

If this is the case then the current state looks good to me, we really arent paying any workers other than funding a pool to use to pay for UIA fees so that people can use assest without paying high fees, which seems liek a fine idea.

[roadscape]

Also: http://cryptofresh.com/reserve - keep in mind it doesn't take into account accumulated BTA fees

[bytemaster]

http://cryptofresh.com/workers

[Chronos]

Bump. What's the current worker landscape and BTS supply inflation?

[Chronos]

It looks like the web wallet doesn't yet have a page for viewing worker role payments (unless I overlooked it). This is an important metric, since it directly correlates with growth in the BTS supply.

What workers are voted in already? What's the best way to vote for/against existing and new workers? Is there a summary page anywhere?

Thanks!