Author Topic: cyber•Rating: Cryptoproperty Evaluation paper and PoC  (Read 1913 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Xypher

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 304
    • View Profile
Bounty has been paid. If you'll find grammar mistakes there all questions to @Xypher :-)

Thank you. I did a quick skim and fixed most typo's (approx 150-170 of them).
I'll go take a quick nap and re-run through to ensure I haven't missed anything.

Do point out if you catch anything and I'll fix it right away.

Offline 21xhipster

Bounty has been paid. If you'll find grammar mistakes there all questions to @Xypher :-)
https://cyber.fund/ - Decetnralized Investment Platform

Offline 21xhipster

@Xypher reserved a job for grammar checking until 6 PM of today
https://cyber.fund/ - Decetnralized Investment Platform

Offline 21xhipster

Hi guys. I'd like to share a paper draft and a corresponding PoC implementation of what I am working on.

tldr:
Paper: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Vz-yS9W-l-Wdqbw3n0SFwXyYFv0Xo-F4i8NbXQvGHxg/edit
PoC implementation: https://cyber.fund/tracking (sortable by rating)

Here are 2 reasons why I need such a thing:
1. Coinmarketcap sucks for me. Superficial methodology of cap calculation, proprietary software, almost absence of due diligence for markets and systems, no transactional analytics. That is definitely not the information I would like to rely on my investment road.. I believe it could be done better.
2. BTS is awesome but it could not be the one. Other awesome technologies such as Ethereum are being developed in parallel. So I expect explosion of high quality investment opportunities. Basic idea behind cyber•Rating is to gather all meaningful cryptoproperty regardless of underlying technology. Think of it like S&P of blockchains. But S&P is not just a rating. It rely on IFRS or GAAP. So when I started to work on rating I stuck with an issue of comparable reporting and criteria. I came to exciting conclusions that could become foundations for the Internet of things, values, chains and everything.

In a paper I discuss design of a proposed system. All reporting logic is based on a foundations that has been built by BitShares. So thank you all. Paper is a draft and is not published yet. A document is editable by anybody.

Please, help to correct the grammar. I am not the best English writer so I know there are a lot of mistakes. I assign a small bounty 10000 bts for those who will help to do it in next 48 hours. I'd like to submit this paper to http://ledger.pitt.edu/ and there are 2 days left :-(

Please, help outline flaws in design. I assign a small bounty of 10000 bts which I split between the most active participators. Think of this bounty as a "thank you" but not as a reward for a job.

PoC implementation in fact does not implement blockchain reporting yet and this is an issue for the next year. But even now it show very interesting non opinionated results that are far better than Coingecko.

Christmas Bonus: https://cyber.fund/tracking contain very interesting CMGR indicator that you wont find anywhere. We've audited all historical data for all blockchains that allow to calculate Compound Monthly Growth Rate. It like CAGR but monthly. It is recalculated real time. Enjoy!

Edited: Typofixes
« Last Edit: December 29, 2015, 06:41:25 pm by 21xhipster »
https://cyber.fund/ - Decetnralized Investment Platform