Author Topic: Beyond Bitcoin (CNX) Hangout w/ Bytemaster Tomorrow @ 10AM EST  (Read 2892 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.


Offline fuzzy

36 in!  Join us and be part of BitShares' weekly community discussion!
WhaleShares==DKP; BitShares is our Community! 
ShareBits and WhaleShares = Love :D

Offline fuzzy

WhaleShares==DKP; BitShares is our Community! 
ShareBits and WhaleShares = Love :D

Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
The issue was discovered only 2 or 3 days ago. You can't ask for them to fix everything in 24h .. they are certainly busy doing something way more important (namely STEALTH)
And I can tell you this, no one else then me would see that bug fixed asap.

Offline fav

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4278
  • No Pain, No Gain
    • View Profile
    • Follow Me!
  • BitShares: fav
Crossposting from the questions thread:

The proposed transactions feature is ready to go in the GUI but there's a bug in the witness node preventing me from releasing it. The bug is that multi-sig accounts don't get notified of proposed transactions that they're supposed to sign off on. When can we expect that bug to get fixed? https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/442

Will there be a new release of the graphene core soon?

why isn't this addressed by cryptonomex? or do you have to insert a coin before they start to talk? D:

Offline svk

Crossposting from the questions thread:

The proposed transactions feature is ready to go in the GUI but there's a bug in the witness node preventing me from releasing it. The bug is that multi-sig accounts don't get notified of proposed transactions that they're supposed to sign off on. When can we expect that bug to get fixed? https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/442

Will there be a new release of the graphene core soon?
Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

jakub

  • Guest
@fuzzy
I might be unable to attend the mumble, but would you please mention our official worker proposal announcement:
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21230.0.html

I don't think I need to tell you how crucial this moment for BitShares is  :)

And I do not mean that you should encourage people to vote in any particular way - please just make everybody aware that voting has started.

Thanks.


Offline xeroc

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12922
  • ChainSquad GmbH
    • View Profile
    • ChainSquad GmbH
  • BitShares: xeroc
  • GitHub: xeroc
Since the core asset (BTS) is owned by "null-account", it's impossible to enable % market fee or % transfer fee for it, even if the committee wants to do so. Should we change the owner to "committee-account" and grant the "Charge market fee" permission to the committee? If yes, how can this change be done, maybe via a hard fork?
NO!
for very simple reasons:
 - BTS is the collateral for all bitassets
 - BTS is a User Issued asset
 - the owner (committee-account) could issue new shares
 - an exchange could replace the committee and print new BTS

We should really never EVER change the issuer of that particular asset.
It is like asking BTC to increase the 21m cap. So please DON'T.

(I appreciate though that you asked :) )

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 4664
    • View Profile
    • Abit's Hive Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Since the core asset (BTS) is owned by "null-account", it's impossible to enable % market fee or % transfer fee for it, even if the committee wants to do so. Should we change the owner to "committee-account" and grant the "Charge market fee" permission to the committee? If yes, how can this change be done, maybe via a hard fork?
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Offline btstip

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 644
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: btstip-io
Hey fuzzy, here are the results of your tips...
Curious about ShareBits? Visit us at http://sharebits.io and start tipping BTS on https://bitsharestalk.org/ today!
Created by hybridd

Offline fuzzy

What are your views on LMSR market makers?  Is CNX thinking about including this in the future?

#sharebits "Bitcoinfan" 20 COPPERTICKET
WhaleShares==DKP; BitShares is our Community! 
ShareBits and WhaleShares = Love :D

Offline fuzzy

is this the question thread :D ?

i would like to know if bytemaster had the time to look into my proposal to create a "Contract for Difference" or "Collaterized Tradingmarket" https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/6

does my proposal need more updates?

#sharebits "Shentist" 20 COPPERTICKET

WhaleShares==DKP; BitShares is our Community! 
ShareBits and WhaleShares = Love :D

Offline Bitcoinfan

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 240
    • View Profile
What are your views on LMSR market makers?  Is CNX thinking about including this in the future?

Offline Shentist

  • Board Moderator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1601
    • View Profile
    • metaexchange
  • BitShares: shentist
is this the question thread :D ?

i would like to know if bytemaster had the time to look into my proposal to create a "Contract for Difference" or "Collaterized Tradingmarket" https://github.com/bitshares/bsips/issues/6

does my proposal need more updates?

Offline fuzzy

This Hangout is w/ Bytemaster of Cryptonomex

Please ask questions Here:

Follow Twitter: @Beyond_Bitcoin

Retweet Here
glow]

Or better yet--Join us!  For updates on upcoming events, attend, record and report live from our Mumble Server!


**Attention Brownie/UIA/Alt-Token Lovers**
Make an account at ShareBits.io and OpenLedger.info to access the sharebot's customized token sending features.
Sponsor the latest Beyond Bitcoin Hangouts by sending to our attendees and employees via the Guestbook!
WhaleShares==DKP; BitShares is our Community! 
ShareBits and WhaleShares = Love :D