So... no one is going to consider BM'S very valid concern that essentially this proposal creates a "walled garden" in between Bitshares and the rest of the crypto currency community?
It would completely kill Bitshares imo. We need bitshares to take advantage of the gateways to the outside world provided by other crypto, not shut them off.
Tonyk's idea was actually a trick to try to get us to destroy bitshares, maybe so he can buy back in at 10% of the price and then try to get the change reverted or something.
Nice conspiracy theory!
And I decided to do this using total community driven way and execution over which I have no control what so ever?
OP of
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,21558.0.htmlNo I truly believe it is a very sound way to do it better and hoped BTS itself can do it, but there is such thing as ideas being too early ...
Next best thing was totally community driven second chain testing the theory independently of BTS.... as there are no sign ups for this community driven effort it is obviously not wanted either. I have no intention to force it on anybody. The side effect of not trying it as a community at almost 100% sharedrop for active community, even if you do not contribute a penny... well they should be obvious.
And there is also such a thing as bad idea, I do not see is as such but I am just one man and can be totally wrong.