Has Graphene development fizzled out ?

[xeroc]

I believe someone will answer your question...

But an ill willed person like myself would ask you, is your "concern" real?

Im just asking because some people might misinterpret the intentions of your post.

The concer is real, I'm trying to determine if the dev team is still "in it" or already moved on to other things ( which if that is he case will of course be announced "all of a sudden" )

the is no such thing as "the dev team" .. in BitShares .. development happens decentralized and if you take a look at the "commit network", you will see many forks and some of them having more some of them having less commits.

[alexkravets]

I believe someone will answer your question...

But an ill willed person like myself would ask you, is your "concern" real?

Im just asking because some people might misinterpret the intentions of your post.

The concer is real, I'm trying to determine if the dev team is still "in it" or already moved on to other things ( which if that is he case will of course be announced "all of a sudden" )

[alexkravets]

Thanx for pointing out the authoritative repo https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/graphs/contributors

But its recent commit traffic doesn't look good either.

P.S. I harbor no delusions that my comments can move the markets :-)

[CLains]

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene

However the difference between graphene and bitshares-2 repo is relatively small.

Fuzzy said the truth here:

It is a normal part of the products lifecycle to not have as much development once core features are done.

but if you want to look at the newest development that has added stealth tx to bitshares, it might be worth looking around on our forums for it

But also not much core code is related to stealth.

Some other work is here: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui/graphs/contributors , which doesn't include UI development of stealth.

Hey looks like i just passed 1000 commits

You're a powerhouse

[svk]

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene

However the difference between graphene and bitshares-2 repo is relatively small.

Fuzzy said the truth here:

It is a normal part of the products lifecycle to not have as much development once core features are done.

but if you want to look at the newest development that has added stealth tx to bitshares, it might be worth looking around on our forums for it

But also not much core code is related to stealth.

Some other work is here: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui/graphs/contributors , which doesn't include UI development of stealth.

Hey looks like i just passed 1000 commits

[abit]

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene

However the difference between graphene and bitshares-2 repo is relatively small.

Fuzzy said the truth here:

It is a normal part of the products lifecycle to not have as much development once core features are done.

but if you want to look at the newest development that has added stealth tx to bitshares, it might be worth looking around on our forums for it

But also not much core code is related to stealth.

Some other work is here: https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2-ui/graphs/contributors , which doesn't include UI development of stealth.

[Akado]

@chryspano is now BitShares' True Detective 

[dannotestein]

Looks that way when looking at commit charts on github

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/graphs/contributors

As phoenike pointed out, you're looking at wrong github repo to see the work being done. Graphene is where most of the coding is done, bitshares-2 is just for bitshares-specific code added to the library.

[Pheonike]

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene

[fuzzy]

It is a normal part of the products lifecycle to not have as much development once core features are done.

but if you want to look at the newest development that has added stealth tx to bitshares, it might be worth looking around on our forums for it

[chryspano]

I believe someone will answer your question...

But an ill willed person like myself would ask you, is your "concern" real?

Im just asking because some people might misinterpret the intentions of your post.

[alexkravets]

Looks that way when looking at commit charts on github

https://github.com/bitshares/bitshares-2/graphs/contributors