Author Topic: Investment decisions: Stan Larimer and Charles Hoskinson  (Read 9412 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline santaclause102

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
    • View Profile
Re: Investment decisions: Stan Larimer and Charles Hoskinson
« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2014, 03:52:32 pm »
It might be innovative (with some technical points and with regard to attracting a lot of developers to the project) from which I3 can learn and improve on! But the given economic model is not likely to give great ROI. See (page 8, my and other's comments)

Offline td services

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 50
    • View Profile
Re: Investment decisions: Stan Larimer and Charles Hoskinson
« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2014, 04:39:23 pm »
I'd be interested in hearing of any other projects along these lines (except NXT - NOT interested).

Why against NXT but not MSC? (just curious)

NXT slammed the door in my face when I went to go invest in it during the presale, leaving me with a very strong personal bias against it. Someone else who sent in a Bitcoin while I was waiting for an answer if we were still able to invest was allowed in. From :

from: Kyune

Re: [ANN] Nxt :: descendant of Bitcoin
November 18, 2013, 12:19:24 AM
from: Come-from-Beyond on November 17, 2013, 11:51:27 PM
from: Come-from-Beyond on November 17, 2013, 10:53:05 PM
from: td services on November 17, 2013, 10:51:09 PM
Can we still join in between now and January 3? I haven't really seen any clear definition of a deadline.

I'm waiting for the answer. BCNext reads this thread.

Some changes in the plan:

1. Fundraising is over. That last 1 BTC, sent after the 2nd marking transaction, will be accepted but no more deposits should be made.
2. Nxt will be launched earlier than on the 3rd of January, right after the final test.
3. New Nxt users r supposed to be attracted by selling NXT and distributing via Nxt Faucet.
4. Messaging feature will be released later to avoid situation when somebody attempts to bloat the blockchain making it too huge for newcomers.

BTW we need one more bootstrapping server, coz 2 servers is not enough.
So, if I understand this correctly:

1) the main dev (BCNext) no longer posts directly to this thread but you purport to communicate with him and speak for him about the project, something we can't confirm,
2) the deadline for contributing BTC to acquire Nxt, which was originally described as being open until the genesis block was approved by the community sometimes at least a month from now, is now suddenly declared over with no advance warning; and
3) the BTC that were already sent to acquire Nxt, which the main dev (BCNext) promised earlier in this thread not to touch until the genesis block was generated, have now been moved.

Mastercoin, on the other hand, ran its funding round to the full length as promised. They have also been very transparent about their operations, established a set of directors to oversee funds, and have been a professionally run project. I'm very happy with the Mastercoin project, as I am with Invictus.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2014, 04:42:52 pm by td services »

Offline boshen1011

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
  • Keyhotee ID:Bo
    • View Profile
Re: Investment decisions: Stan Larimer and Charles Hoskinson
« Reply #17 on: January 28, 2014, 07:07:49 am »
    I was just doing some research before making any investment decisions in Bitshares and/or related projects. From this thread it appears that there is some bad blood between Invictus Innovations ex-CEO Charles Hoskinson and current CEO Stan Larimer:

Unfortunately this reflects badly on *both* the related projects:
   - Invictus Innovations, Inc
   - Next Cryptography Inc and the upcoming Ethereum project:

Sadly it makes it slightly harder to make any investment decisions, so I am looking for some clarifications from anyone with some insight into the matter. It would be a big help to anyone looking to invest in any of these projects, confidence wise - much appreciated.

Some related thoughts/questions:

As the original Bitshares white paper was co-authored by both Stan and Charles , so Ethereum Vs Bitshares are competing products and both born from the same Bitshares white paper - thoughts?
   "Ethereum and some other projects I'm working on are going to completely replace the need for keyhotee and bitshares"

There is also this message from one "ravenshore" that suggests a link still exists between Bitshares and Ethereum(?):
"Very large design team from the Bitshares, colored coin, and mastercoin communities also some major innovations with the wallet client."

Some references:

Charles Hoskinson:
"Past: Acting Chief Executive Officer at Invictus Innovations Incorporated"
"Current: Chief Executive Officer at Next Cryptography Inc." : Any relashionship to NXT  ?
Profile on bitcointalk:;u=102392
Ethereum :

Stan Larimer
These forums :-);u=5;u=611

Bitshares Investor:
My name is Bo Shen, executive director and CEO Asia of 3i.

We have no bad blood with Charles on our side.

Regarding to the resignation of Mr.Charles Hoskinson, I would like to make a clarification:

The board of directors and investors unanimously agreed for his resignation.

Invictus and Ethereum.

From left :  Charles Hoskinson, Vitalik Buterin, Stan Larimer, Bo Shen

« Last Edit: January 28, 2014, 07:09:54 am by boshen1011 »

Offline coolspeed

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 536
    • View Profile
    • My Blog
Re: Investment decisions: Stan Larimer and Charles Hoskinson
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2014, 02:18:50 am »
May this photo go long in history.
Please vote for  delegate.coolspeed    dac.coolspeed
BTS account: coolspeed
Sina Weibo:@coolspeed