Author Topic: AMD OpenCL Momentum miner  (Read 139027 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline racer8

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #210 on: February 09, 2014, 11:25:13 pm »
7990: 3540cpm to 4480cpm = +27%,  algo 1&3 about the same
7850: 780cpm to 1070cpm = +37%  algo 1&3 about the same

wow!

Offline jae208

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 525
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #211 on: February 09, 2014, 11:26:35 pm »
How many Protoshares will you make per day with an and 290x?
http://bitsharestutorials.com A work in progress
Subscribe to the Youtube Channel
https://www.youtube.com/user/BitsharesTutorials

Offline Schwede65

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 65
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #212 on: February 10, 2014, 12:17:17 am »
R9 R290, Catalyst 13.12, Powertune +20%, [email protected] and [email protected] with Linux-v0.1.4 running -a 0, two threads per GPU and no other load. So far, no one was able to reproduce this in Windows but it should be possible because even a 280X easily hits more than 2700cpm. Still wondering because yesterday a user with 2 R9 290X reported only about 6100 cpm.
W7-64-catalyst13.12-clpts0.1.4 (-a 0 or 2) on a 290X / 1160 core / 1475 memory
3479 cpm

Offline funtik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #213 on: February 10, 2014, 01:57:54 am »
if I have 6x video card do I type  -t 0 or -t 6 in the command line?

Offline NaN

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #214 on: February 10, 2014, 02:08:25 am »
if I have 6x video card do I type  -t 0 or -t 6 in the command line?
You have to type -t 0,1,2,3,4,5. Perhaps I shall introduce something like -t 0-5 in the next release...

Offline Darkbane

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #215 on: February 10, 2014, 02:19:14 am »
if I have 6x video card do I type  -t 0 or -t 6 in the command line?
You have to type -t 0,1,2,3,4,5. Perhaps I shall introduce something like -t 0-5 in the next release...

the readme file seems pretty straight forward, maybe see how well people of other languages interpret the examples clearly or not, I know sometimes things translate weird to me but are basic to those who speak it... but showing the whole command line seems to give enough to guess at to make things work. I always appreciate less options (when it comes to two ways to do the same one thing), means less things I must try to get it right.

« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 02:21:52 am by Darkbane »

Offline Darkbane

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #216 on: February 10, 2014, 02:28:03 am »
To those using the new versions (where we just got a 25% or better boost for most it seems)... the miner was already leaps ahead of others, and this rockets it even further... I think it would be a nice gesture to donate an entire day or large portion to him for his efforts...

I suggest we have a mine for NaN day...

please message him for the best address to donate to if you do, as I just did 1.516 to him, he should update the readme and miner screen, just a friendly reminder here for him to update those heh ;)
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 04:27:39 am by Darkbane »

Offline Ykw

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 88
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #217 on: February 10, 2014, 02:34:32 am »
ASUS R9-290X 1050 core.. default RAM.. 3150 col/m (+28% from 2450 col/m)! catalyst 13.251-131206a-165817C-ATI over windows 7 64 bit.. over XEON overclocked 35% (I know it does not matter.. lol).
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 02:37:22 am by Ykw »

Offline rajapatr1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 10
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #218 on: February 10, 2014, 03:02:12 am »
Hello

 is it normal ? Gigabyte R9 280X X4 get 10000-11000col/M for ver 0.2.2

Thank you

Offline Malfunction

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #219 on: February 10, 2014, 03:05:47 am »
Figured I'd register to share my experience with 7850, heads up to the dev if anything :)

1.2 is running @ ~870 c/m sometimes up to 900

1.4 is maxing out at 390

Thanks for a cool piece of software !

Ok, going to eat my hat here. It's now up to 1080 c/m. Though it did take about 2 hours to "accelerate". 

Offline mbender71

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #220 on: February 10, 2014, 03:48:38 am »
I can't thank you enough NaN for the incredible miner + revisions!
My current rig has 4 x MSI R9 290, running Windows 8.1 and I'm
currently seeing 11821 c/m (gpu @ 1100 MHz, mem @ 1250 MHz,
power limit @ -15%). All my 290's run at 68C to 71C with fan @ 80%.

Now the above numbers are with just a single GPU thread. When I open
another cmd window and fire up the same exact clpts as the first window
it works, though at a little less than half of the first thread. I'm currently
seeing 10400 c/m in the first thread and 4600 c/m in the second thread.

I decided to kill both threads and start them at the same time and now I
can see that both are running the same c/m which together equal the same
c/m speed as a single thread. I was guessing (hoping) that utilizing the extra
memory on the gpus would help (via more threads) but it doesn't. Just want
to throw that out and ask others to not be too harsh on me... I'm new to this
mining thing :-)

Again NaN, I can't thank you enough!!!
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 04:05:41 am by mbender71 »

Offline xxx2003gs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #221 on: February 10, 2014, 04:38:23 am »
ub linux


[email protected]:~$ cd /home/desktop/pts
[email protected]:~/desktop/pts$ ./clpts PtLx9kDLTXtR1ae3u7naXLPeGjjHZ1PGoR -t 0
./clpts: error while loading shared libraries: libboost_system.so.1.55.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory



what's problem about it?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 04:40:02 am by xxx2003gs »

Offline NaN

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #222 on: February 10, 2014, 04:55:15 am »
That's a missing library search path. execute the following command: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH. After that start the miner.
EDIT: Could you use the address Pk3mHjZrW3HGmx5jMNaN1GhXT2WgXHjRCz if you wanna mine for me?
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 04:57:57 am by NaN »

Offline xxx2003gs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #223 on: February 10, 2014, 05:17:15 am »
That's a missing library search path. execute the following command: export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=./:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH. After that start the miner.
EDIT: Could you use the address Pk3mHjZrW3HGmx5jMNaN1GhXT2WgXHjRCz if you wanna mine for me?
and how set GPU clock,GPU fans in linux?

why i juet 1 card work,can,t find the other cards?

yes i send to Pk3mHjZrW3HGmx5jMNaN1GhXT2WgXHjRCz
« Last Edit: February 10, 2014, 05:33:31 am by xxx2003gs »

Offline crazycoin

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #224 on: February 10, 2014, 05:48:02 am »
I am getting 6830 col/m on 5x Sapphire 7950 with stock settings. That is ~1370 col/m. I have Celeron with 4Gb Ram.

Does anybody knows, how to tweak performance to get closer to 1800 col/m as some users are reporting.

I am using Ubuntu 13.1 with the latest drivers and miner v0.1.3.
Please use v0.1.2 until the next version is released. This should be fastest on your GPU. I'm working on an update with huge performance gains.

v. 0.1.2 with some tweaks I managed to squeeze out 7250 col /m
v. 0.1.4 I am  getting 9300col/m whoa

Slightly decreasing memory clock and increasing engine clock, using  algorithm 1, I managed to increase speed to 10500. Whooha!