Author Topic: AMD OpenCL Momentum miner  (Read 143849 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline funtik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #255 on: February 11, 2014, 07:57:59 am »
To run the miner on all four cards you have to use -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3. additionally you could add -a 1, which should be faster than -a 0 (which are the defaults) on  7970. There is no option "a".

what is the difference between using 0,1,2,3 or the way you mentioned?

thx

Offline nanaya

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #256 on: February 11, 2014, 08:06:04 am »
I think R9 290(X) use two threads no effect in windows , same core and memory clock use two threads no different with one threads.

Offline linked67

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #257 on: February 11, 2014, 08:20:21 am »
Hi,

This app is really nice but i have a problem on one computer. With the same drivers as every other, i have less cpm that on other. Tested on a fresh install on another part of my hard drive, it's working full power. The problem is on my personal install and don't want to format everyting. I'm running ubuntu 13.10.
I have try to clean, purge the drivers and reinstall but still less cpm that on a fresh install.

Do you have an idea what file i should check to have full cpm power like on a fresh install ?

Offline visterln

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #258 on: February 11, 2014, 08:46:11 am »
To run the miner on all four cards you have to use -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3. additionally you could add -a 1, which should be faster than -a 0 (which are the defaults) on  7970. There is no option "a".

I know the problem, the next single card is behind the 7970 fix release, other multi-card is still using the original 2.2 version, re-download the new version of the normal speed of 4 280x at 14000 CPM .WIN7 64

Offline visterln

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #259 on: February 11, 2014, 08:49:55 am »
NAN, this software is amazing, just more of a parameter can be 23 percent faster overall than the 0.2 version upgrade 64%, amazing, thank you!!

Offline visterln

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #260 on: February 11, 2014, 09:07:54 am »
Tested under power, increased from 780 watts to 880 watts, increase the percentage of 12.8%
Speeds from 11200 CPM raised to 14020 CPM, increase the percentage of 25%

4 * 280x win7 64bit

Offline xxx2003gs

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #261 on: February 11, 2014, 09:25:03 am »
Maybe your Xorg.conf is screwed. Run aticonfig --initial --adapter=all as root and restart the computer.
and how to set gpu fans in linux?

Offline Mr305

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #262 on: February 11, 2014, 10:46:09 am »
BTER.com PTS is there

http://bter.com/trade/pts_btc

Its on the Front from BTC

Offline Hukkel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #263 on: February 11, 2014, 11:38:30 am »
Tested under power, increased from 780 watts to 880 watts, increase the percentage of 12.8%
Speeds from 11200 CPM raised to 14020 CPM, increase the percentage of 25%

4 * 280x win7 64bit

I am a bit confused over the correct scrypt to use.

Can you please show yours?

I am using 3 280X cards running @ 1150/1500 and I get 7880 cpm in a single screen. When I open a second thread I get 2330 cpm on that thread and the first thread slowly goes lower and lower untill it goes under the 7880 total cpm together. Should I use the -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 command? And also add -a 1 or not at all?

Offline mbender71

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #264 on: February 11, 2014, 11:43:28 am »
Still playing with running 2 threads under Win8.1x64 w/R9 290's.
While I have noticed that -a 1 provides the best results on my gpu's,
so far running -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3 hasn't shown much more c/m's BUT
it has shown a huge increase in CPU usage. Using a single thread per
GPU my CPU would sit around 2% utilization, however when running
two threads per GPU my CPU is now at 63% utilization. I suspect that
clpts is having internal conflicts when running 2 threads under Win8.1x64.
Just reporting findings to help the community out. MANY thanks NaN for
the awesome software (again)!

Offline visterln

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 28
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #265 on: February 11, 2014, 12:14:37 pm »
Tested under power, increased from 780 watts to 880 watts, increase the percentage of 12.8%
Speeds from 11200 CPM raised to 14020 CPM, increase the percentage of 25%

4 * 280x win7 64bit

I am a bit confused over the correct scrypt to use.

Can you please show yours?

I am using 3 280X cards running @ 1150/1500 and I get 7880 cpm in a single screen. When I open a second thread I get 2330 cpm on that thread and the first thread slowly goes lower and lower untill it goes under the 7880 total cpm together. Should I use the -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 command? And also add -a 1 or not at all?

use the -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 -a 1

over

Offline Hukkel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #266 on: February 11, 2014, 01:02:11 pm »

use the -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 -a 1

over

Thank you very much. I will give it a try and report back.

Offline Aselert

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #267 on: February 11, 2014, 03:31:00 pm »
So finally... no CUDA miner realized?  ::)


Offline Darkbane

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #268 on: February 11, 2014, 04:23:10 pm »
Still playing with running 2 threads under Win8.1x64 w/R9 290's.
While I have noticed that -a 1 provides the best results on my gpu's,
so far running -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3 hasn't shown much more c/m's BUT
it has shown a huge increase in CPU usage. Using a single thread per
GPU my CPU would sit around 2% utilization, however when running
two threads per GPU my CPU is now at 63% utilization. I suspect that
clpts is having internal conflicts when running 2 threads under Win8.1x64.
Just reporting findings to help the community out. MANY thanks NaN for
the awesome software (again)!

I had the same CPU leap under windows 8.1 64bit as well... I just thought it was my crummy 270X cards, but now that you mention its a problem for the 290X there might be something to this... normally I am under 1% cpu usage for clpts, but when I launch a second copy on the same cards, I leap to 40% cpu usage split between the two instances...

Offline Darkbane

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 119
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #269 on: February 11, 2014, 04:26:43 pm »
Does anyone have a link to a good ubuntu install with directions for a bootable usb flash drive, so I may try booting my system under ubuntu to try the other version out... so far I have failed and found malware or installs that did not seem to jive with the directions they put out there... I mean there has to be a simple image out there that'll fit on a 16GB flash drive just waiting to be written...

(I should say a current ubuntu install, I've found many old ones but I'm trying to find ones that will work out of the bat for a complete linux novice with R9 drivers)

Heh, thank you to the person who PM'd me quickly with the link below... you can download the pen drive program, as well as the 13.10 iso quickly... I guess they were right, I really did over think it by searching out specific things instead of just going to ubuntu directly.

http://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop/create-a-usb-stick-on-windows
« Last Edit: February 11, 2014, 04:44:58 pm by Darkbane »