Author Topic: AMD OpenCL Momentum miner  (Read 143861 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline NaN

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #270 on: February 11, 2014, 05:20:34 pm »
So finally... no CUDA miner realized?  ::)
I'm working on Nvidia support but I do not have a fully functional version yet.

Offline lty616

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 17
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #271 on: February 11, 2014, 05:31:11 pm »
So finally... no CUDA miner realized?  ::)
I'm working on Nvidia support but I do not have a fully functional version yet.

We are all expecting your outcomes and will appreciate for everything you will be done for nvidia. Hope we will have similar performance as AMD.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2014, 05:59:24 pm by lty616 »

Offline tazbox

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 7
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #272 on: February 11, 2014, 05:56:40 pm »
That update, with my R9 290x with 2.1 i have 2k cpm and im happy, with this update 3k Oo, Thank you so much. Please add nvidia :D i have 3 nvidia :(.

Ps : with r9 290X i have the beter result without -a, 3150 cpm.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2014, 06:25:10 pm by tazbox »

Offline Aselert

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 6
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #273 on: February 11, 2014, 07:25:13 pm »
So finally... no CUDA miner realized?  ::)
I'm working on Nvidia support but I do not have a fully functional version yet.

Thanks for the reply NaN, could you give to us a little idea about the performances?
;) Regards

Offline ivanlagru

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #274 on: February 11, 2014, 08:25:06 pm »
You should get in touch with cbuchner1, maybe you can come up with an improved mmc/pts miner.

Offline Hukkel

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #275 on: February 11, 2014, 09:24:37 pm »
Listen to this. I have 3 280X.

 1 Gigabyte 280X windforce OC
 2 Sapphire 280X regular model.

The -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 -a 1 scrypt did not work well enough for my setup. I reached 8400 CPM with it.
I think I found out why.

 The sapphires run now each in their own window @ 3496 & 3457 CPM each using 2 threads and -a 1 algorith

 The Gigabyte does not like that. It stays around the 1.400 cpm mark. I do use it for the monitor but ok.
 So i delete the -a 1 scrypt; 1600 cpm. MEH
 So I take it back to basics: 1 thread and no algorith choice.
 Now it runs happily at 2.600 cpm.

 ODD

So one 280X is not the other 280X and for PTS mining I would RIGHT NOW recommend the Sapphire regular version of the 280X. BUT just because of my own experience. I like the Gigabytes but I can't find the optimal configuration yet.

 I am happily chugging away at 9700 cpm in total now with these 3 cards
 And @ 1150 shares per hour.

 Not too shabby. With the right cards a full rig of 280Xs (5 pieces) would ramp up to 16.500 cpm and 1.800+ spm.
« Last Edit: February 11, 2014, 09:26:25 pm by Hukkel »

Offline mbender71

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #276 on: February 11, 2014, 09:38:56 pm »
Wow! That's VERY impressive indeed! I have 4 x MSI R9 290 Gaming cards running
Win8.1x64 with tweaked settings from AfterBurner and I'm only getting ~12300 c/m
with the latest software from NaN. I'm still tackling the 2 thread thing myself and
currently run the -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3 which doesn't get me much more c/m but severely
increases my CPU usage for some reason. I'm assuming you are running Windows as
well since you mentioned "run in their own window" or are you running Linux and just
have multiple terminals open? Much thanks for this info!

:-)

Listen to this. I have 3 280X.

 1 Gigabyte 280X windforce OC
 2 Sapphire 280X regular model.

The -t 0,0,1,1,2,2 -a 1 scrypt did not work well enough for my setup. I reached 8400 CPM with it.
I think I found out why.

 The sapphires run now each in their own window @ 3496 & 3457 CPM each using 2 threads and -a 1 algorith

 The Gigabyte does not like that. It stays around the 1.400 cpm mark. I do use it for the monitor but ok.
 So i delete the -a 1 scrypt; 1600 cpm. MEH
 So I take it back to basics: 1 thread and no algorith choice.
 Now it runs happily at 2.600 cpm.

 ODD

So one 280X is not the other 280X and for PTS mining I would RIGHT NOW recommend the Sapphire regular version of the 280X. BUT just because of my own experience. I like the Gigabytes but I can't find the optimal configuration yet.

 I am happily chugging away at 9700 cpm in total now with these 3 cards
 And @ 1150 shares per hour.

 Not too shabby. With the right cards a full rig of 280Xs (5 pieces) would ramp up to 16.500 cpm and 1.800+ spm.

Offline Coindgr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #277 on: February 11, 2014, 10:06:58 pm »
Can you implement something similar to the Intensity in cgminer?

I would like to work and keep mining using the same GPU.


Thank you very much for your hard work!

Offline Bigboppa

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 30
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #278 on: February 11, 2014, 10:47:12 pm »
if you have a 280 gpu with no monitor connected, you can run -t 0,0 (2 threads).
with monitor connected you better run -t 0 (1 threads)
So i have to run -t 0,0,1 (3 threads) because at device 1 there is my monitor....

-t 0,0,1 gives me 6200 cpm with 2x 280x

Offline Coindgr

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 18
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #279 on: February 11, 2014, 11:17:40 pm »
if you have a 280 gpu with no monitor connected, you can run -t 0,0 (2 threads).
with monitor connected you better run -t 0 (1 threads)
So i have to run -t 0,0,1 (3 threads) because at device 1 there is my monitor....

-t 0,0,1 gives me 6200 cpm with 2x 280x

I'm using CAD software, and I get some lag, I need to decrease the intensity.

Note: I'm using 1x280x - Sapphire Dual-X, and using 2 threads makes cpm drop to around 1400. Seems that there are different results for 280x

Offline beatfried

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 11
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #280 on: February 11, 2014, 11:43:39 pm »
Just wanna check if my values are okay or not:

I got actually 2 R9 290, producing about 6400 cpm, but only ~24 spm. Is this okay? I'm just asking because Hukkel said 16900 cpm will make about 1800 spm... that would make 600+ spm for my 6400 cpm (if I wasn't to sleepy to calcuate that :D):/

Offline mbender71

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #281 on: February 11, 2014, 11:59:39 pm »
My 4 x R9 290's are getting 12270 c/m (collisions / min) and ypool is reporting 1360 s/h (shares / hour).
I think Hukkei meant to say 1800+ s/h (shares / hour), not 1800 s/m (shares / min). You might be missing
the hour & minutes conversion since your 24 s/m is really 1440 s/h.

:-)

Just wanna check if my values are okay or not:

I got actually 2 R9 290, producing about 6400 cpm, but only ~24 spm. Is this okay? I'm just asking because Hukkel said 16900 cpm will make about 1800 spm... that would make 600+ spm for my 6400 cpm (if I wasn't to sleepy to calcuate that :D):/

Offline wsnnwa

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 47
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #282 on: February 12, 2014, 12:53:15 am »
Got Ubuntu installed on my second rig, this time I decided to try out some OC. I used one 290X for this test, clocked at 1150/1400. Only Running -t 0,0, no gains noticed from -a.

[STATS] 2014-Feb-11 19:49:25 | 4582.29 c/m | 17.71 sh/m | VL: 62 (100.00%), RJ: 0 (0.00%), ST: 0 (0.00%)


« Last Edit: February 12, 2014, 12:57:26 am by wsnnwa »

Offline Raiden

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 36
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #283 on: February 12, 2014, 12:55:49 am »
Hello,everyone!I have 2 290s and 2 7970s.I found something weird´╝Ü[email protected]/1400  only got 3250Cpm/card(two threads -a 1) and [email protected]/1500 got  3300cpm/card(two threads -a 1) ,13000cpm total.290 even slower than 7970?I can not accpet it.Please tell me how to tweak it?Thx.

Offline shadowK

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 2
    • View Profile
Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS miner released
« Reply #284 on: February 12, 2014, 01:55:05 am »
Hi NaN. I have 4*R9 290x running on Xubuntu 64 and they are round 16000 cpm for two days. Today I replaced my old motherboard and restart the miner. It hits 16000 cpm than decreases gradually about 100 cpm per sec. After it hit around 8000 cpm, the computer freezes. I restart the computer and try to run the miner. The miner isn't be able to start anymore. Do you have any idea about it? My catalyst is the latest version from amd.

I also tried the old version and it didn't work too.

EDIT: The error message is "error in xptMiner/clInit.cpp, line 96: Method clGetDeviceIDs(...) failed (errorcode -1)"
« Last Edit: February 12, 2014, 02:15:28 am by shadowK »