Author Topic: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案  (Read 439 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline finn-bts

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 210
    • View Profile
On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« on: August 07, 2019, 03:00:13 pm »
众所周知,中国区是工人提案预算的主要投票支持者,但是这些提案并没有为支持者提供足够的信息披露与尊重,以供支持者了解其最新进展及会为bts带来什么好处,这里我要求所有需要提供预算工人提案的发起者,每月至少以中英文发表一次提案最新进展及预算报告,供支持者评估其可行性,否则我会号召bts持有者对其撤票。
As is known to all, Chinese investors to participate in the vote is very much, but the workers did not provide enough information to supporters know the latest progress in project, here I require all the workers need to provide the budget proposal published in Chinese and English at least once a month proposal report, the latest progress and budget for supporters to evaluate the feasibility, otherwise I would call for BTS holders for the cancellation of support.

Offline zhouxiaobao

Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2019, 12:27:23 am »
Even in my opinion, the vote should be withdrawn first and then the various proposals should be reevaluated.

Offline zhouxiaobao

Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2019, 12:39:09 am »
Absolutely right

Offline zhouxiaobao

Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2019, 03:08:51 pm »
Can we find some way to reduce our expenses?

Offline bench

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 204
    • View Profile
Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2019, 03:35:35 pm »
Can we find some way to reduce our expenses?
Remove your proxy and vote only for the refund workers.
« Last Edit: August 08, 2019, 03:48:20 pm by bench »

Offline zhouxiaobao

Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #5 on: August 09, 2019, 12:31:10 am »
Can we find some way to reduce our expenses?
Remove your proxy and vote only for the refund workers.
I already did. The problem is that the system allocation is too simple, only 400 million votes can be allocated? This is a total of 2.7 billion coins, ah, 400 million votes can dilute the benefits of the other 2.3 billion votes, is that reasonable?
« Last Edit: August 09, 2019, 12:33:48 am by zhouxiaobao »

Offline Patricia46

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1
    • View Profile
Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #6 on: August 12, 2019, 09:06:33 am »
Can we find some way to reduce our expenses?
Remove your proxy and vote only for the refund workers.
I already did. The problem is that the system allocation is too simple, only 400 million votes can be allocated? This is a total of 2.7 billion coins, ah, 400 million votes can dilute the benefits of the other 2.3 billion votes, is that reasonable?

Thanks for the clarification

Offline yamtt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 130
    • View Profile
Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #7 on: August 12, 2019, 05:08:05 pm »
Only the mortgage ticket has voting rights

Offline Customminer

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 646
  • Bitshares FTW!
    • View Profile
  • GitHub: grctest
Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #8 on: August 17, 2019, 03:23:07 pm »
Is using a translate tool insufficient for understanding ongoing worker proposals? If websites don't work with these tools, this can be amended.

Offline abit

  • Committee member
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3667
    • View Profile
    • Steemit Blog
  • BitShares: abit
  • GitHub: abitmore
Re: On the workers' proposal 关于工人提案
« Reply #9 on: August 17, 2019, 06:12:47 pm »
Is using a translate tool insufficient for understanding ongoing worker proposals? If websites don't work with these tools, this can be amended.
It's insufficient.
Machine-translating is still not smart enough.
BTS account: abit
BTS committee member: abit
BTS witness: in.abit