0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
We had 7 blocks in the past 18 hours. There is only one transaction per block.... Miners are rejecting to include valid tx?
Finally a block included transactions...this pool is good: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PrrtrqsqSi1nVpBwer46WaY4x9kr1Cw9fAthis pool is bad: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PpXRMhz5dDHtFYpbDTpiAMJaVarMUJURT6Though the "bad" pool is excluding even its own transactions. Any idea who owns what? I emailed ypool and but can't find contact info for beeeeer.org
commit bc32c370ecdf93d3d21b14029694b99c2ea9ae56Author: JH <[email protected]>Date: Sat Nov 23 18:31:16 2013 +0100 Better transaction handlingcommit 2bc39593dad391353a68adb5bfe6b950da268800Author: JH <[email protected]>Date: Wed Nov 20 02:43:05 2013 +0100 Interrupt on new work The miner now stops processing the current work when a new block appears.commit 151634efd03d3e07fda5d701e0da337ef5b98aefAuthor: JH <[email protected]>Date: Tue Nov 19 00:53:37 2013 +0100 Critical transaction fix Fixed a little bug that made it impossible for the xpt pool server to generate valid blocks that contain non-coinbase transactions.
acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 526) std::cout << "********************************************" << std::endl;acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 527) std::cout << "*** ptsminer - Pts Pool Miner v" << VERSION_MAJOR << "." << VERSION_MINOR << " " << VERSION_EXT acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 528) std::cout << "*** by xolokram/TB - www.beeeeer.org - glhf" << std::endl;acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 529) //std::cout << "*** thanks to jh00, testix & Co." << std::endl; //...for no transactions in the network? pff!acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 530) std::cout << "***" << std::endl;acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 531) std::cout << "*** press CTRL+C to exit" << std::endl;acecb9b0 (Thomas Baumbach 2013-11-21 20:18:32 +0100 532) std::cout << "********************************************" << std::endl;
coinplorer showed the new block like 15 minutes before agexplorer, and my client still doesn't see it. Is the network split? Anyone know what's up?
Before we move to DPOS, should 3I use AGS FUND to mine PTS? If not, I am afraid the whole pts network will not be functional. The PTS amount for AGS was only 407 for yesterday, because many transactions were not confirmed.@bytermaster @stan
This is exactly why I vote to POS/DPOS.
Quote from: toast on May 28, 2014, 02:47:20 amFinally a block included transactions...this pool is good: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PrrtrqsqSi1nVpBwer46WaY4x9kr1Cw9fAthis pool is bad: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PpXRMhz5dDHtFYpbDTpiAMJaVarMUJURT6Though the "bad" pool is excluding even its own transactions. Any idea who owns what? I emailed ypool and but can't find contact info for beeeeer.orgThe problem is with the ypool miners which are all derived from https://github.com/jh000/jhProtominer.gitSpecifically, if the miners are still running without these 3 fixes (which is likely for the older optimized forks)Code: [Select]commit bc32c370ecdf93d3d21b14029694b99c2ea9ae56Author: JH <[email protected]>Date: Sat Nov 23 18:31:16 2013 +0100 Better transaction handlingcommit 2bc39593dad391353a68adb5bfe6b950da268800Author: JH <[email protected]>Date: Wed Nov 20 02:43:05 2013 +0100 Interrupt on new work The miner now stops processing the current work when a new block appears.commit 151634efd03d3e07fda5d701e0da337ef5b98aefAuthor: JH <[email protected]>Date: Tue Nov 19 00:53:37 2013 +0100 Critical transaction fix Fixed a little bug that made it impossible for the xpt pool server to generate valid blocks that contain non-coinbase transactions.
Quote from: bitder on May 28, 2014, 04:13:52 amQuote from: toast on May 28, 2014, 02:47:20 amFinally a block included transactions...this pool is good: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PrrtrqsqSi1nVpBwer46WaY4x9kr1Cw9fAthis pool is bad: https://coinplorer.com/PTS/Addresses/PpXRMhz5dDHtFYpbDTpiAMJaVarMUJURT6Though the "bad" pool is excluding even its own transactions. Any idea who owns what? I emailed ypool and but can't find contact info for beeeeer.orgThe problem is with the ypool miners which are all derived from https://github.com/jh000/jhProtominer.gitSpecifically, if the miners are still running without these 3 fixes (which is likely for the older optimized forks)Code: [Select]commit bc32c370ecdf93d3d21b14029694b99c2ea9ae56Author: JH <[email protected]>Date: Sat Nov 23 18:31:16 2013 +0100 Better transaction handlingcommit 2bc39593dad391353a68adb5bfe6b950da268800Author: JH <[email protected]>Date: Wed Nov 20 02:43:05 2013 +0100 Interrupt on new work The miner now stops processing the current work when a new block appears.commit 151634efd03d3e07fda5d701e0da337ef5b98aefAuthor: JH <[email protected]>Date: Tue Nov 19 00:53:37 2013 +0100 Critical transaction fix Fixed a little bug that made it impossible for the xpt pool server to generate valid blocks that contain non-coinbase transactions.Ooops, I think bitder is right. http://ptspool.com/ provided the link to an old jhProtominer build, which didn't include the critical transaction fix. I think yvg1900 can contact ptspool owner to update the link and urge miners to update as well.