Author Topic: 0.4.11 Testers Wanted (not mandatory)  (Read 11254 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline svk

Runs stable for me (for the last 10 hours or so), lots of connections (160, although set to 20 desired, not that it matters really, the more the better 8) ) and uses half the memory of 0.4.10!

Your comments about memory usage made switch over the bitsharesblocks client, as it was using almost 1gig of memory. With the new version from master it uses 500-600mb less than before, which is awesome!

I also noticed another nice addition: 30 retries to bind the httpd port when you launch with --server. This is excellent cause I would often need to open then kill then restart the client in order to get it to bind to the correct port. Good job devs!
Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

Offline svk

Running fine on my seednode as well, no crashes so far, have around 105 connections.
Worker: dev.bitsharesblocks

Offline wackou

Runs stable for me (for the last 10 hours or so), lots of connections (160, although set to 20 desired, not that it matters really, the more the better 8) ) and uses half the memory of 0.4.10!
Please vote for witness wackou! More info at http://digitalgaia.io

Offline CoinHoarder

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 660
  • In Cryptocoins I Trust
    • View Profile
fwiw 0.4.10 has been rock solid for me (linux cli build). 48 hours plus of no crashes.. about 24 hours longer than I've made it thus far.

The windows client is still pretty unstable though.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2014, 06:32:32 am by CoinHoarder »
https://www.decentralized.tech/ -> Market Data, Portfolios, Information, Links, Reviews, Forums, Blogs, Etc.
https://www.cryptohun.ch/ -> Tradable Blockchain Asset PvP Card Game

Offline puppies

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1659
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: puppies
My seed node is up and running in gdb.  Currently with 140 connections.  I plan to run it overnight to see if it crashes with default settings.  If not I will increase maximum connections to 500 to give it a stress test.  If some other form of testing would be more advantageous, please advise.
https://metaexchange.info | Bitcoin<->Altcoin exchange | Instant | Safe | Low spreads

Offline valzav

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 294
    • View Profile
Not really related to this testing but something I just noticed: I think the logic for choosing which delegate feed is expired in the gui might not be correct. I believe feeds should expire in 24 hours, but some feeds are red which are less than 24 hours old. It seems to be the feeds which were the previous day calendar day, not < 24 hours (unless we are now on a 12 hour cycle, in which case I need to change my script to make sure it updates at least every 12 hours).

Thank you. This bug is fixed https://github.com/BitShares/web_wallet/commit/a0dcce95798e8b7b2533e16d0299b81b5e3dc882

Offline emski

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1282
    • View Profile
    • http://lnkd.in/nPbhxG
Looks stable so far.
I'll update delegates and seed node.

I've updated my seed/chain but not my Delegate. Are we supposed to? I've been waiting for a post to this thread:

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7067.0

As it was written it is not mandatory. However it is better if someone tests this before release.

Offline Riverhead

Looks stable so far.
I'll update delegates and seed node.


I've updated my seed/chain but not my Delegate. Are we supposed to? I've been waiting for a post to this thread:


https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=7067.0


Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
I'm testing the same one. I cloned it twice to be sure since the get_info says 0.4.10 but the tool_kit revision has a very new age.



{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "9 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 12:52:49"
}

Thanks. I am not that stupid after all.
I will erase the scratched text above then...the sad thing is I just  found/recovered all my balances, saved and then  made some decent trades...and I cannot enjoy them... at least for a while... :)
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline Riverhead

I'm testing the same one. I cloned it twice to be sure since the get_info says 0.4.10 but the tool_kit revision has a very new age.



{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "9 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 12:52:49"
}


Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Forgot to post.
Clean build it on Ubuntu 14.10. Did not want to sync (gave it like 10 min with 7 connections).
So, copied the old database directory and now seem to work fine.
(Not-fillable shorts are not removed from the GUI of course... :)  )

I am an idiot....

Is this what I should be testing?
Code: [Select]
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "7 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 15:13:05"
}

Not that anybody told me if the above is 0.4.10 or 0.4.11 but it stated crashing on me after several orders in the market. Now it just closes itself after log in.

Not that anybody told me if the above is 0.4.10 or 0.4.11 but it stated crashing on me after several orders in the market. Now it just closes itself after log in.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2014, 01:08:32 am by TheOnion »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
I just compiled & ran latest master. I am still seeing a short at 28.5714, which is below the current avg price of 30.9751.

There is a median price feed that overrules the average.
but the median price is about 34...
the filter seems work with command line,  not work with GUI

Offline chono

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 59
    • View Profile
maybe,we could build the system on the "docker".this will reduce lots of bugs.

来自我的 HTC 802d 上的 Tapatalk

Weibo:Will_BTS

Offline bitcoinerS

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 592
    • View Profile
GUI wallet error trying to add favorite

Code: [Select]
RPC Server Error: In method 'wallet_add_contact_account': Assert Exception (10)

Code: [Select]
>>> get_info
{
  "blockchain_head_block_num": 375910,
  "blockchain_head_block_age": "7 seconds old",
  "blockchain_head_block_timestamp": "2014-09-01T23:38:40",
  "blockchain_average_delegate_participation": "100.00 %",
  "blockchain_confirmation_requirement": 1,
  "blockchain_accumulated_fees": "256,062.98647 BTSX",
  "blockchain_delegate_pay_rate": "2.11692 BTSX",
  "blockchain_share_supply": "1,999,919,942.21843 BTSX",
  "blockchain_blocks_left_in_round": 12,
  "blockchain_next_round_time": "at least 2 minutes in the future",
  "blockchain_next_round_timestamp": "2014-09-01T23:40:40",
  "blockchain_random_seed": "ca375209443ba0f9041039a55d7056b6b6dcd6a1",
  "client_data_dir": "/home/slava/.BitSharesX",
  "client_version": "0.4.10",
  "network_num_connections": 5,
  "network_num_connections_max": 200,
  "ntp_time": "2014-09-01T23:38:47",
  "ntp_time_error": -0.111175,
  "wallet_open": true,
  "wallet_unlocked": true,
  "wallet_unlocked_until": "31 years  in the future",
  "wallet_unlocked_until_timestamp": "1910-04-04T18:56:51",
  "wallet_last_scanned_block_timestamp": "2014-09-01T23:38:40",
  "wallet_scan_progress": "100.00 %",
  "wallet_block_production_enabled": false,
  "wallet_next_block_production_time": null,
  "wallet_next_block_production_timestamp": null
}
default (unlocked) >>> about
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "7 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 16:31:10"
}

>>> approve bitcoiners

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Forgot to post.
Clean build it on Ubuntu 14.10. Did not want to sync (gave it like 10 min with 7 connections).
So, copied the old database directory and now seem to work fine.
(Not-fillable shorts are not removed from the GUI of course... :)  )

I am an idiot....

Is this what I should be testing?
Code: [Select]
{
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision": "b43f6c3871b9b8680996a8955dcf4a41facd563c",
  "bitshares_toolkit_revision_age": "7 hours ago",
  "fc_revision": "3222dc7c0be62b9ad0fdfd303c5c4f53b39063e6",
  "fc_revision_age": "4 days ago",
  "compile_date": "compiled on Sep  1 2014 at 15:13:05"
}

Not that anybody told me if the above is 0.4.10 or 0.4.11 but it stated crashing on me after several orders in the market. Now it just closes itself after log in.
« Last Edit: September 02, 2014, 01:08:06 am by TheOnion »
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.