Author Topic: 0.4.11 Release Candidate 2 Testing  (Read 13348 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Harvey

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 244
    • View Profile
BTS       Witness:harvey-xts Seed:128.199.143.47:2015 API:wss://128.199.143.47:2016 
MUSE   Witness:harvey-xts Seed:128.199.143.47:2017 API:ws://128.199.143.47:2018

Offline vikram


after run wallet_regenerate_keys
the wallet_scan_progress always run from 0%~1.2%, again and again

version rc1 is ok, but rc2 can't work

This may be fixed in the next version.

Offline wesphily

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 156
    • View Profile
confirmed. 64 bit has issues. I get the exact same error on my windows 8.1 64 bit.

Offline Gentso1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: gentso
Windows 64 bit version was just posted by DAC Sun Limited...

https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx/releases


This version should be significantly faster than the 32 bit version, but may have new undiscovered crashes.  Please test.

I get error: "The application was unable to start correctly..." for 64-bit version.


Ditto:



Same issue for me too, is their going to be another build released soon or should we just go back to using the old version?

32 Bit Version worked for me.
It only seems to be a issue with the 64 bit version. Has anyone been able to run the 64bit version successfully?

Offline newtree

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 223
    • View Profile
    • HelloBTS
  • BitShares: newtree
updating to RC2

expect a good result
« Last Edit: September 04, 2014, 02:02:15 pm by newtree »
BTS ID:newtree/baicai 
微信公众号:hellobts
网站:www.hellobts.com

Offline GaltReport

Windows 64 bit version was just posted by DAC Sun Limited...

https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx/releases


This version should be significantly faster than the 32 bit version, but may have new undiscovered crashes.  Please test.

I get error: "The application was unable to start correctly..." for 64-bit version.


Ditto:



Same issue for me too, is their going to be another build released soon or should we just go back to using the old version?

32 Bit Version worked for me.

Offline Gentso1

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 931
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: gentso
Windows 64 bit version was just posted by DAC Sun Limited...

https://github.com/dacsunlimited/bitsharesx/releases


This version should be significantly faster than the 32 bit version, but may have new undiscovered crashes.  Please test.

I get error: "The application was unable to start correctly..." for 64-bit version.


Ditto:



Same issue for me too, is their going to be another build released soon or should we just go back to using the old version?

Offline liondani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3737
  • Inch by inch, play by play
    • View Profile
    • My detailed info
  • BitShares: liondani
  • GitHub: liondani
Still needs work. Transaction scanning seems to be stuck at 0% progress. Still unable to recover lost balances, but it isn't crashing anymore at least.

Considering I managed to refresh my new balances (after new orders executed) rescaning the blockchain it must be only a visual bug (0% progress)

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi
forget it, I have repair my wallet by import from an init json file.
maybe the backup json file is not good, which  is backup automatic from a upgrade.

after run wallet_regenerate_keys
the wallet_scan_progress always run from 0%~1.2%, again and again

version rc1 is ok, but rc2 can't work

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
The GUI is misrepresenting, the margin orders info - the 'Total' by doing, I do not exactly know what with the amount; and 'Collateral' by dividing it by 1000.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline alt

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2821
    • View Profile
  • BitShares: baozi

after run wallet_regenerate_keys
the wallet_scan_progress always run from 0%~1.2%, again and again

version rc1 is ok, but rc2 can't work
« Last Edit: September 04, 2014, 03:09:01 am by alt »

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
I "canceled" my shorts by buying bitBTC with the pricing of my shorts (?) and covered my position...



How did you close them without the transaction ID?

Or did you do it in the GUI? If so just check if you are not long and short those bitBTCs.
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

Offline mtang

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 366
  • BTSX id:mtang
    • View Profile
updating to RC2
completed.
looks no problem
mtang.outofcontrol
« Last Edit: September 04, 2014, 02:49:35 am by mtang »
BTSX:wallet_approve_delegate btsx.outofcontrol true
DNS :wallet_account_set_approval mtang true
感谢给我们的受托人团队“失控”btsx.outofcontro以及she.bitrose投票。请关注FUND数字资产运作计划//立足兢兢业业的standby delegate//weibo ID:汤O包

Offline liondani

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3737
  • Inch by inch, play by play
    • View Profile
    • My detailed info
  • BitShares: liondani
  • GitHub: liondani
I made 2 short orders on bitBTC/BTSX market and I can't cancel both of them !

Code: [Select]
TYPE PRICE (BTSX/BITBTC) QUANTITY (BITBTC) COST (BTSX) COLLATERAL (BTSX) ACTION
Short 15,500.00            1.00                 15,500.00                     canceling..
Short 15,800.00            1.00000000         15,799.99999             canceling..

RPC Server Error: In method 'wallet_market_cancel_order': unknown market order (20011)

There is a wallet_market_cancel_order2 call that may work for you.

on "Overview" tab I see one of them pending (?) ...
How can I find the order id for both to cancel them?

I "canceled" my shorts by buying bitBTC with the pricing of my shorts (?) and covered my position...


PS To refresh my bitBTC balance so I can cover my position I must go all the time to console and "wallet_rescan_blockchain" !!!
on the previous versions the balances after order executions are automatically refreshed to the new balance stand (now manual only!)



thanks but I didn't use them as said...

@dani

wallet_market_order_list <base_symbol> <quote_symbol> [limit] [account_name]
                       
wallet_market_order_list2 <base_symbol> <quote_symbol> [limit] [account_name]

blockchain_list_pending_transactions   

Offline tonyk

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3308
    • View Profile
Ohhh

'Account Orders History'

Finally, cool! +5%
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.