[DELEGATE PROPOSAL] >>> delegate.kencode <<< |||||||| ♥♥ PLEASE VOTE ♥♥ |||||||

Started by kenCode, April 29, 2015, 08:58:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

xeroc

Quote from: iHashFury on August 28, 2015, 02:08:08 PM
Quote from: xeroc on August 28, 2015, 01:30:38 PM
you could put the name of your own delegate in your slate .. that should work and essentially results in an "empty" slate

I have done that but would prefer a clean slate. That's why I asked ken as he was able to clean his.
the slate is a parameter of you publicData field:

wallet_account_update_registration <account_name> <pay_from_account> [public_data] [delegate_pay_rate]

just use {} as public data .. make sure to put your delegate_payrate as otherwise you may reduce your pay to zero unintentionally .. not sure ..

iHashFury

Quote from: xeroc on August 28, 2015, 01:30:38 PM
you could put the name of your own delegate in your slate .. that should work and essentially results in an "empty" slate

I have done that but would prefer a clean slate. That's why I asked ken as he was able to clean his.

xeroc

you could put the name of your own delegate in your slate .. that should work and essentially results in an "empty" slate

kenCode

kenCode@Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Blurt/Hive: @Agorise
Session: 0525c95e7f37dca6e29ac84fe7030f0bc5f8bcd564207f03c893e47d2a381a2337

iHashFury

How can I remove my slate completely?

I am getting the following error unless I leave in one delegate

20040 invalid_slate: invalid slate
Cannot publish the null slate!
    {}
    th_a  wallet.cpp:1918 publish_slate

    {"account_to_publish_under":"delegate.ihashfury","account_to_pay_with":"delegate.ihashfury","sign":true}
    th_a  wallet.cpp:1962 publish_slate

    {}
    th_a  common_api_client.cpp:5922 wallet_publish_slate

    {"command":"wallet_publish_slate"}
    th_a  cli.cpp:626 execute_command

kenCode

Crypto Coaching schedules & activities now being uploaded to our new Facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/BitSharesMunich) so please Like and Share --thank you! :)

and retweeters: https://twitter.com/kenCode_de/status/627885966401929216
kenCode@Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Blurt/Hive: @Agorise
Session: 0525c95e7f37dca6e29ac84fe7030f0bc5f8bcd564207f03c893e47d2a381a2337

kenCode

We got the new video up:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YZw950LCifY&list=PLjbx3qSmDe7T2LvQ5VQVm5zbiXYXsEsbp&index=3
PLEASE SUBSCRIBE, LIKE AND SHARE!

The BitShares POS project is now underway!! 8)
Now hiring - I need some help with the api...
@Monsterer ?
@Roadscape ?
Other qualified Devs?

I have the designated Odoo Developer ready to work with us and I am building a relationship with the ShopKeep Devs too. All we need now is to get the BitShares POS api connected to their UI's...
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,17314.msg226407.html#msg226407
kenCode@Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Blurt/Hive: @Agorise
Session: 0525c95e7f37dca6e29ac84fe7030f0bc5f8bcd564207f03c893e47d2a381a2337

iHashFury

I am just trying to understand the DPOS system by watching who and how delegates are voted in and why.

No apologies needed.


kenCode

Not too many Delegates use the slate anymore I see. It's probably for the same reason I quit using it too, war doesn't solve problems, hard work does. I can still vote without publishing a slate. My opinions about others are my own, please respect that :)
I assume that's what you meant, if not, I apologize.
kenCode@Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Blurt/Hive: @Agorise
Session: 0525c95e7f37dca6e29ac84fe7030f0bc5f8bcd564207f03c893e47d2a381a2337

iHashFury

Quote from: kenCode on July 19, 2015, 04:27:43 PM
Quote from: iHashFury on July 19, 2015, 04:15:46 PM
Ken, great work promoting bitshares.  +5%

Is there a reason why you have stopped publishing a slate?

Thank you @iHashFury :)

Yeah, I pulled my slate because out of the 20 or so names I had on there, I wanted to downvote one of them. When I did that, the slate no longer showed his name, he would see that and start another war with me so I just pulled the whole thing to avoid the war.

Just a thought, but did you ever think the other 19 names could stop voting for you?

iHashFury

Quote from: xeroc on July 20, 2015, 12:41:35 PM
Quote from: iHashFury on July 20, 2015, 11:33:31 AM
If all delegates used xeroc's slate system of trust, voting would be a lot more interesting!
As a remark to iHashFury's comment here. I am almost certain he does NOT mean to use my set of slates but the script that can make your live easier maintaining your slate:
https://github.com/xeroc/bitshares-pytools/tree/master/delegate-slate

Yes, the slate script.

Sorry for the confusion

xeroc

Quote from: iHashFury on July 20, 2015, 11:33:31 AM
If all delegates used xeroc's slate system of trust, voting would be a lot more interesting!
As a remark to iHashFury's comment here. I am almost certain he does NOT mean to use my set of slates but the script that can make your live easier maintaining your slate:
https://github.com/xeroc/bitshares-pytools/tree/master/delegate-slate

iHashFury

Quote from: kenCode on July 19, 2015, 04:27:43 PM
Quote from: iHashFury on July 19, 2015, 04:15:46 PM
Ken, great work promoting bitshares.  +5%

Is there a reason why you have stopped publishing a slate?

Thank you @iHashFury :)

Yeah, I pulled my slate because out of the 20 or so names I had on there, I wanted to downvote one of them. When I did that, the slate no longer showed his name, he would see that and start another war with me so I just pulled the whole thing to avoid the war.

Thanks for the honest reply but as a trusted 100% delegate your slate is now much more benefit to new users.

Your slate/trust/opinion is now more important than before.

If all delegates used xeroc's script system (https://github.com/xeroc/bitshares-pytools/tree/master/delegate-slate) of trust, voting would be a lot more interesting!



xeroc

Quote from: kenCode on July 19, 2015, 07:47:37 PM
What's gonna happen to slates in 2.0?
Not sure. But people can hand-over voting power to trusted-third party!

Quote
Can I vote for Workers, Delegates, or Witnesses privately or publicly, separately?
put your funds in an unknown pseudonym and vote with that one instead.

Quote
So like if latency gets too high, or someone is missing blocks consistently, will the algo start bumping those guys down in rank so that they can be replaced with higher quality nodes etc?
Not in the beginning. Maybe later when shareholders vote for such a protocol upgrade

Quote
It would be cool if the algo could even choose nodes that are geographically further apart too via their class c or something.
The addresses of the witnesses are unknown as we are operating in a P2P network

kenCode

What's gonna happen to slates in 2.0?
Can I vote for Workers, Delegates, or Witnesses privately or publicly, separately?
So like if latency gets too high, or someone is missing blocks consistently, will the algo start bumping those guys down in rank so that they can be replaced with higher quality nodes etc? It would be cool if the algo could even choose nodes that are geographically further apart too via their class c or something.
kenCode@Agorise
Matrix/Keybase/Blurt/Hive: @Agorise
Session: 0525c95e7f37dca6e29ac84fe7030f0bc5f8bcd564207f03c893e47d2a381a2337