Proxy: clayop - Voting power for reasonable fee system and healthy network

Started by clayop, October 26, 2015, 07:19:32 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

abit

@clayop Please vote for the refund or burn workers.

IT'S DANGEROUS NOW.

By now, the refund worker which got highest votes is refund400k (113,325,926 BTS), which means any whale or group of whales or group of proxies who have more than 113K voting power is able to vote in a worker and steal funds from the reserve pool IMMEDIATELY. There is a flaw in the worker system, see https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene/issues/565. We(proxies and stake holders) can't all keep watching the worker list 24 hours.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

Frodo

Do you plan to vote for the proposed BSIP worker (1.14.29) ?
I'd appreciate your support for it.

xeroc

Quote from: clayop on January 05, 2016, 04:41:05 AM
maqifrnswa doesn't upgrade his node still. He never get my votes in the future.

And I am asking other proxies to vote down him. @bytemaster @bitcrab @xeroc @jakub @Xeldal
He may just be on vacations with poor internet connectivity.
Voted him down Removed my votes for now an awaiting clarification

clayop

maqifrnswa doesn't upgrade his node still. He never get my votes in the future.

And I am asking other proxies to vote down him. @bytemaster @bitcrab @xeroc @jakub @Xeldal
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

clayop

Update:

I voted down maqifrnswa because this witness is not reactive to yesterday's urgent patch.

And I voted for cass's proposal (1.14.28) and all eight burn/refund workers created by the committee.
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

abit

Quote from: clayop on December 20, 2015, 03:42:22 PM
Quote from: jakub on December 20, 2015, 01:11:45 PM
Quote from: clayop on December 19, 2015, 02:30:14 PM
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
What do you mean? Please elaborate.
My previous thought is this proposal should be near zero cost. But I figured out that $300 for stealth is going to go xeroc to maintain the BSIP. That makes sense.
I think 1.14.17 (Documentation/Technical Support/Python+UI Development) would be voted in for the BSIPs instead of this special one.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

clayop

Quote from: jakub on December 20, 2015, 01:11:45 PM
Quote from: clayop on December 19, 2015, 02:30:14 PM
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
What do you mean? Please elaborate.
My previous thought is this proposal should be near zero cost. But I figured out that $300 for stealth is going to go xeroc to maintain the BSIP. That makes sense.
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

sittingduck


jakub

Quote from: clayop on December 19, 2015, 02:30:14 PM
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
What do you mean? Please elaborate.

abit

Quote from: clayop on December 19, 2015, 02:30:14 PM
Quote from: abit on December 19, 2015, 01:16:11 PM
@clayop How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
In addition of that, I'm very busy these days to visit my family, so the vote already passed.
Anyway you can still vote now..
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

clayop

Quote from: abit on December 19, 2015, 01:16:11 PM
@clayop How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.
I was wondering why shareholders have to pay $300 instead of $3 when the fund comes from external source (in this case onceuponatime)
In addition of that, I'm very busy these days to visit my family, so the vote already passed.
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

abit

@clayop How about the STEALTH work proposal (1.14.18)? It seems to have already been approved.
BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

clayop

Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

clayop

I reject the below worker proposal because (1) it is too expensive (about $35,000) and (2) it is not a core feature of Bitshares.
IMHO, we now need to use a worker proposal to expand our core functions. But I'm still open to any of your opinion. Please let me know.
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

clayop

I support the worker proposal 1.14.8 created by @wmbutler
He is very enthusiastic, organized, and good at communication. I think the worker proposal will empower the GUI development.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20144.0.html
https://docs.google.com/document/d/14d9bBAyUoB9wcBpFnYoGpE1MF0RnOwMKpF2Z8eh0QkI/edit
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

tonyk

Quote from: clayop on November 19, 2015, 02:52:51 AM
Did you set proxy to me? I cannot find your account in my follower list

as you should not! If it was not clear by now.
What an ....
Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

clayop

Quote from: tonyk on November 19, 2015, 02:46:37 AM
Quote from: clayop on November 19, 2015, 12:56:37 AM
If you have any conflicts with currently voted members by me, please let me know, and why.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20073.msg258413.html#msg258413

and why - where is the link about  your final vote...I know you posted 700 posts of [sometimes changing] opinions.


in other words, as far as proxies go, why did you vote for yourself if no such info was provided?...by yourself

Did you set proxy to me? I cannot find your account in my follower list
My voting is found here: http://cryptofresh.com/u/clayop
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

tonyk

Quote from: clayop on November 19, 2015, 12:56:37 AM
If you have any conflicts with currently voted members by me, please let me know, and why.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,20073.msg258413.html#msg258413

and why - where is the link about  your final vote...I know you posted 700 posts of [sometimes changing] opinions.


in other words, as far as proxies go, why did you vote for yourself if no such info was provided?...by yourself

Lack of arbitrage is the problem, isn't it. And this 'should' solves it.

clayop

If you have any conflicts with currently voted members by me, please let me know, and why.
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

clayop

Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop

unreadPostsSinceLastVisit


clayop

As a proxy, I support the BM's proposal (from #2~#5). Regarding the fee, I still support lowering the fee as mentioned in BM's proposal #1.

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,19890.0.html
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop


abit

BitShares committee member: abit
BitShares witness: in.abit

clayop

Please set proxy for "clayop" for the growth of our ecosystem. My goals and plans are as follows.

Purpose: To attract new users with reasonable fee-base and to promote healthy network

Goals:
1) To vote for committee members who propose reasonable fee system
2) To vote for diligent witnesses who are very reactive and reliable
3) To vote for talented workers who can expand BitShares ecosystem

Plans:
1) I won't vote for one person as both committee member and witness
2) I will support current 31 witnesses, and may be able to vote for more (maximum 51)


Here's my slate
https://bitshares.openledger.info/#/account/clayop/voting
Bitshares Korea - [url="http://www.bitshares.kr"]http://www.bitshares.kr[/url]
Vote for me and see Korean Bitshares community grows
delegate-clayop