[ANN] ptsweb.beeeeer.org - Protoshares mining sub-pool

[andhar]

16657 2013-11-14 12:47:24 465 / 276113 -> 0.05503 PTS / 32.68 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16650 2013-11-14 12:14:11 314 / 117302 -> 0.08747 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16646 2013-11-14 11:57:07 840 / 244829 -> 0.11210 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16640 2013-11-14 11:16:50 280 / 70984 -> 0.12888 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16638 2013-11-14 11:02:47 8 / 5527 -> 0.04729 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16637 2013-11-14 11:01:35 244 / 49073 -> 0.16246 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16635 2013-11-14 10:51:13 1030 / 282509 -> 0.11912 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16607 2013-11-14 09:46:15 138 / 90245 -> 0.04996 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16584 2013-11-14 09:24:02 66 / 38269 -> 0.05635 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16575 2013-11-14 09:14:30 165 / 107938 -> 0.04995 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16548 2013-11-14 08:46:26 1 / 353 -> 0.09256 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations
16547 2013-11-14 08:46:16 204 / 108029 -> 0.06170 PTS / 32.67 PTS -> block waiting for confirmations


What is this? Not getting any blocks or what? :P

[HCarvalho]

doesntmatter
do you know what happened with ypool?

[svd]

cause you were competing for points with 50thousand hacked machines!!! LOL

where are they mining now ?
ypool.net is dead
beeer not getting blocks...

[doesntmatter]

cause you were competing for points with 50thousand hacked machines!!! LOL

[HCarvalho]

This isn't very fast, I have 20 cores on a VPS mining for PTS and litle profit, in the last hour and half only mined 0.09 in blocks waiting for confirmation, I have 2 VPS with 8 cores each runninh 32 threads between them and a 4 Core VPS with 4 threads.

[svd]

jh just has process set to start at low priority...lol

why? it is good :)

[doesntmatter]

jh just has process set to start at low priority...lol

[svd]

working very well

i5 3570k 105
i7 6core 150
i7 old 4 core 93

:)

[xolokram]

it's experimental (especially the current network code). i guess i can fix the issue with other processes by lowering the priority of the threads, i'll look into the code later today.

- xolokram

[jerrybusey]

hey, the new build (v0.5) looks quite faster but when using alongside cgminer (scrypt) it drops the hashrate 10-20%
I understand it's not necessarily a problem, just letting you know, the coyote miner does the same so I was using your client

I'm losing maybe 2-3% running 2 threads but when I was running 3 it was in the 10-20% range (on a quad core). I've had the same experience with all the pts miners though.

I have also had a few crashes since .5  whereas I hadn't had any crashes in prior versions. Otherwise it seems to be doing well.

[hiddenvalleyranch]

I like the client but it keeps crashing. On windows and Linux.

[ehalvers]

Go beeeeer!! We need moar blocks.

[sfinder]

hey, the new build (v0.5) looks quite faster but when using alongside cgminer (scrypt) it drops the hashrate 10-20%
I understand it's not necessarily a problem, just letting you know, the coyote miner does the same so I was using your client

SAME HERE BUT YPOOL client works fine

[max]

hey, the new build (v0.5) looks quite faster but when using alongside cgminer (scrypt) it drops the hashrate 10-20%
I understand it's not necessarily a problem, just letting you know, the coyote miner does the same so I was using your client

[gee]

It's quite faster to build thanks!

As for linux building, feel free to look at my pkgbuild:
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/protoshares-thbaumbach-miner-git/