What leads you to believe that the developer of 90% of the code for your DAC (i.e. 3I), deserves smaller percentage of the shares than your in-house developer Bitsapphire (at guaranteed 5%).
[ 3I can theoretically get up to 20% but only if they owned all
PTS and AGS, so in practice they will be lucky if they get 1-2%;
while in house developer Bitsapphire - gets guaranteed 5%.]
Your in house developer has proven so far that :
1. Transferring domains is kind of above their pay grade.
2. They consistently have trouble updating their delegate software, while many one man operations do it faster and more smoothly.
3.Their artistic qualities are somewhat questionable. (example follows)
Thanks for deleting my innocent post, btw! - for those interested it just said "Reserved"...
Does being a moderator pumps your ego?
Here is a better idea! Why don't you send the Bitsapphire guys to delete all my posts in all parts of this forum, you find in any way shape or form hurting you cause?