Main Menu

WSJ article.

Started by Ggozzo, September 22, 2014, 05:01:42 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

merockstar

Quote from: matt608 on September 25, 2014, 06:13:16 PM
Quote from: merockstar on September 22, 2014, 05:36:22 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 22, 2014, 02:32:44 PM
Quote from: CLains on September 22, 2014, 02:20:38 PM
rofl, the person had one job, to list one fact and blew it.

joke is on us though  :-\

Does wsj have a "corrections" or errata section? A spot where they mention inaccuracies in previous issues? We could probably get them to publish a correction. That way bitshares gets mentioned in 2 issues.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

This piece one of the most impartial pieces about crypto I've ever seen in a major publication. Because it looks like the author actually did some due diligence instead of making up a bunch of crap, I sent him an e-mail letting him know all the points I saw in it that might be inaccurate or misleading. He expressed interested in writing a follow up article next week.

Nice work, I'm looking forward to reading it.

Ended up not hearing back from him.

Murderistic

Feel free to hit them up with corrections -

Readers can alert The Wall Street Journal to any errors in news articles by emailing [email protected] or by calling 888-410-2667.


matt608

Quote from: merockstar on September 22, 2014, 05:36:22 PM
Quote from: biophil on September 22, 2014, 02:32:44 PM
Quote from: CLains on September 22, 2014, 02:20:38 PM
rofl, the person had one job, to list one fact and blew it.

joke is on us though  :-\

Does wsj have a "corrections" or errata section? A spot where they mention inaccuracies in previous issues? We could probably get them to publish a correction. That way bitshares gets mentioned in 2 issues.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

This piece one of the most impartial pieces about crypto I've ever seen in a major publication. Because it looks like the author actually did some due diligence instead of making up a bunch of crap, I sent him an e-mail letting him know all the points I saw in it that might be inaccurate or misleading. He expressed interested in writing a follow up article next week.

Nice work, I'm looking forward to reading it.

merockstar

Quote from: biophil on September 22, 2014, 02:32:44 PM
Quote from: CLains on September 22, 2014, 02:20:38 PM
rofl, the person had one job, to list one fact and blew it.

joke is on us though  :-\

Does wsj have a "corrections" or errata section? A spot where they mention inaccuracies in previous issues? We could probably get them to publish a correction. That way bitshares gets mentioned in 2 issues.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

This piece one of the most impartial pieces about crypto I've ever seen in a major publication. Because it looks like the author actually did some due diligence instead of making up a bunch of crap, I sent him an e-mail letting him know all the points I saw in it that might be inaccurate or misleading. He expressed interested in writing a follow up article next week.

Ggozzo

Quote from: biophil on September 22, 2014, 02:32:44 PM
Quote from: CLains on September 22, 2014, 02:20:38 PM
rofl, the person had one job, to list one fact and blew it.

joke is on us though  :-\

Does wsj have a "corrections" or errata section? A spot where they mention inaccuracies in previous issues? We could probably get them to publish a correction. That way bitshares gets mentioned in 2 issues.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

They must. I originally saw this posted on r/bitcoin, where they were making fun if the title because they spelled decipher as decifer. You can still see the misspelling in the URL.

Riverhead

It's not completely wrong but not as accurate as it could be. Like CLains said it's not exactly all their fault. BitSharesX, BTSX, BitShares-PTS...to someone following dozens of crypto technologies I can understand mixing that up.

biophil

Quote from: CLains on September 22, 2014, 02:20:38 PM
rofl, the person had one job, to list one fact and blew it.

joke is on us though  :-\

Does wsj have a "corrections" or errata section? A spot where they mention inaccuracies in previous issues? We could probably get them to publish a correction. That way bitshares gets mentioned in 2 issues.

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

Support our research efforts to improve BitAsset price-pegging! Vote for worker 1.14.204 "201907-uccs-research-project."

CLains

rofl, the person had one job, to list one fact and blew it.

joke is on us though  :-\
Vote for BitSpace EOS Block Producer!

[url="https://steemit.com/eos/@bitspace/bitspace-eos-block-producer-candidate"]https://steemit.com/eos/@bitspace/bitspace-eos-block-producer-candidate[/url]

bobmaloney

"The crows seemed to be calling his name, thought Caw."
- Jack Handey (SNL)

JA

Quote from: MeTHoDx on September 22, 2014, 05:42:45 AM
I skimmed the article but couldn't find any mention of BitShares.
yea Ctr + F says no

Method-X

I skimmed the article but couldn't find any mention of BitShares.
[url="https://edabit.com"]https://edabit.com[/url]

Ggozzo

#1
WSJ article mentions BitsharesX. I think they got their fact wrong.

http://m.us.wsj.com/articles/how-to-deficer-cryptocurrencies-1411333011?mobile=y