I need 4 million.
XTS5TpccJBKr5qpebZWDMTiQzoTya9eDeR9TChYc6g2yGnxZTEQFB

按北美习惯叫casino是中文开始了的谐音。100多年前中国铁路工人晚上开赌前都是这样叫“开始囖，开始囖”,所以北美的赌场都叫casino

更名后的DAC不局限于机会类游戏

Post them if you have better options.

Here is the draft white paper of "Bitshares Play"

http://www.bitsuperlab.com/pdf/BitsharesPlayWhitePaper.pdf

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6757.0

https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=6747.0

When someone shorts USD then a BitUSD is lent to them, right? But the idea is they do this to sell the USD for XTS and buy it back later, right? If so my only question is this: is the BitUSD paid to that person for them to sell on the market themselves or does the process involve it being automatically sold for them?

I think if that person need to hold the BitUSD for a while and sell on the market themselves. He can achieve this by placing short orders and ask orders the same time, you need to double collaterals to create BitUSD at current market price anyway.

Eureka!

Wow, what's that?

I prefer  change   evil to selfish
In fact, as a normal user of DAC, we believe that every delegate is selfish
we believe every delegate would choose to miss block if they can profit.
we need set rules to  punish  miss block if possible.

yes, not blaming the evil, so we need to resolve it mathematically within consensus.
The ultimate of this solution can effectively reduce minimum ticket draw time from 101 blocks to 3 blocks and no one will choose to be evil intentionally.

In DPOS RNG algorithm, an evil delegate can only choose to throw away an unfavorable random result by intentionally missing block on his slot turn.

This could only be a problem, when the ticket draw interval is less than 101 blocks, because delegate can predict which block he will produce. Then he can choose to buy ticket which will draw in that block.

If the ticket draw interval is larger than 101 blocks, which means there will be at least one shuffle in that period, then the evil delegate can not predict which block he will produce. Then his only strategy is to guess or put tickets in each of the 101 blocks. If guess, his chance is 1/101, the *expect* return he can get back by attacking is the price of that ticket when he lose, because the delegate after him will continue to replace him and draw randomly. If he choose to put ticket in each blocks, his attack cost is (101 * block_ticket_sale), but what's the expected return, still the ticket sale he put in one block, he will lose.

Maybe for some games 101 blocks draw interval is too long for their requirement, and need shorter draw time, the solution is as following:

Ticket result will be drawn by 2 delegates:

The first delegate's random number is only in charge of producing a number X, which is between 1 to 3, and that X will determine the Xth block after him will draw the result random for the ticket. The 2th delegate could be the evil guy who is trying to attack, but he can not predict who will produce the right drawing block before 4 blocks, his attack cost is (3 * block_ticket_sale), but his expect return is still only 1 block_ticket_sale. The only thing game rule need is to set the draw interval 1 block before the first delegate.

Note: block_ticket_sale means all the ticket sale the evil delegate buy in one block.

 

BitShares Play

I like this.