Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brekyrself

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 35
211
General Discussion / Re: Any non spam posts I should read here?
« on: October 26, 2016, 01:30:56 am »
While not post related, liquidity has come a long way the last few months.  There is actually support on both sides of popular BTS markets.

https://cryptofresh.com/charts also shows a general up trend in fill orders, transfers, and account creations.

212
General Discussion / Re: Any non spam posts I should read here?
« on: October 25, 2016, 03:47:35 am »
It's been very slow around here ever since Dan went full time on Steem...

213
Do you have heard about PEERPLAYS ?

Sent from my SM-G900F using Tapatalk



I am familiar with Peerplays.  My posting outlines an idea that companies can take advantage of right now with the current BitShares software.

214
General Discussion / What real world problems can BitShares alleviate?
« on: October 20, 2016, 03:54:07 am »
As @Stan would say, you need to think bigger!  Rather you like or dislike Steem, it is an example of blockchain tech attempting to branch off into the real world.  For a blockchain to succeed, we need to look for issues in the real world that can be solved by blockchain technology.  At the same time however a blockchain is not the best solution to every problem!


First real world problem in which I see BitShares can alleviate while also bringing a substantial amount of new users into the ecosystem.


Monetizing Massively multiplayer online role-playing games

These extremely popular world wide games have a cash flow problem which I believe can be solved by BitShares.  Basically the current model for a MMORPG is to:

1.  Charge a price for the base game
2.  Charge a monthly subscription fee.
3.  Offer "credits" for in game purchases (transaction flows through company)  ie 500 credits for $50

Item's 1 and 2 are simple where as item 3 becomes very complicated and controversial however are required as these games carry massive on going development costs.


Enter BitShares MMORPG

BitShares can provide these companies with a built in revenue stream.  I will try to outline a basic example how this can work.

The most basic of in game economy's consist of such stores of values:  Platinum, Gold, Silver, Copper.  These can easily be added as a UIA to the BitShares dex for example gamename_Gold vs BitGold.  Each game will have separate markets, naming could be Everquest_Gold vs BitGold for example.

Cash flow 1:
This solves part of line item 3 above where the game company no longer will need to process credit card transactions for in game credits.  The blockchain will handle this and they can also charge a fee for these trades.

Cash flow 2:
Once a user purchases some Everquest_Gold with their BitGold they are now ready to spend it within the game's marketplace.  Most of these games have dedicated market places where users buy and sell in game items.  Once again this economy is now running on BitShares and each users in game transactions will generate a fee.  User ABC bought item xyz for 7 Everquest_gold.  This is simply a transfer thus a fee will go to the game company.  Multiple this fee by the thousands and thousands of players constantly buying/selling items with each other and this becomes a real cash cow.

Cash flow 3:
This can also work in reverse if a user wants to liquidate their in game assets.  They can simply trade Everquest_gold > BitGold.  Once again a market trade and transaction fee going to the game company.

Cash flow 4:
Since BitShares provides a real $ outlet for the company, monthly subscriptions can now be paid with Everquest_Gold that the user earned while playing the game!  The company can simply convert this into any FIAT via a gateway such as OpenLedger.


The above cash flows are the absolute simplest of idea's that connect real and virtual game worlds.  Obviously developers can run with this idea and incorporate more areas where fee's can be administered.

Tying this together with BitShares will require some coordination such as when a user creates a character, a BitShares wallet for them following the naming scheme above is also created.  gamename_username.  The game company would need to run a host just as OpenLedger does today to pay for these registrations.


Anyone know any game company executives?

215
General Discussion / Re: transactions older than 6 months?
« on: October 16, 2016, 01:53:48 am »
You can use a block explorer.

https://cryptofresh.com/

217
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: October 11, 2016, 06:42:27 pm »
@lil_jay890 When you look at the top 10-20 on coinmarketcap one could say they all "suck."  Bitcoin has the first mover advantage however BTS and yes Steem are the only ones doing something different with real world use cases.

I did see in the troll box yesterday, OpenLedger mentioned a GUI revamp being done this month.  People do not understand bitcoin and when they load up bitshares, it's simply overwhelming.  I would hope to see the GUI revamp increase new user traction/retention and thus should drive up the price of bts.

218
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: October 11, 2016, 01:24:54 am »
Interesting info in the chat box today:

anonymous2572: do you have any roadmap or plans on GUI work?
anonymous1131: note that openledger here is always run by me Ronny Boesing
anonymous1131: I think you will see something nicve coming up in octiober
anonymous1131: almost done

anonymous2572: thats great to hear. I'm on here a lot and see very confused new users. hope to see improvements
anonymous2572: keep up the good work, this project has amazing potential
anonymous1131: yes, the new gui is meant to offer users three diffent ways to access
anonymous1131: basic, casual and experienced

219
General Discussion / Re: The death of Bitshares
« on: October 09, 2016, 10:19:16 pm »
What do you feel is wrong with Bitshares that needs immediate development?

220
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: October 05, 2016, 09:29:33 pm »
One of the releases changed the naming scheme and dropped the "open" part of assets.  This is confusing for new users as when your on the bts trading tab for example there is now BTC and bitBTC.  They do not know the difference.

If we keep this style of dropping the prefix, I believe there should be an additional tab with ONLY bitassets so users can be assured they are trading blockchain backed assets.
This is done by Openledger and it's only their choice. Bitshares client display prefixes as earlier.

I sent them a message, thanks for the tip.  I thought @svk was doing the GUI work for Openledger also?

221
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: October 05, 2016, 08:24:05 pm »
One of the releases changed the naming scheme and dropped the "open" part of assets.  This is confusing for new users as when your on the bts trading tab for example there is now BTC and bitBTC.  They do not know the difference.

If we keep this style of dropping the prefix, I believe there should be an additional tab with ONLY bitassets so users can be assured they are trading blockchain backed assets.

222
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: October 05, 2016, 08:20:29 pm »
Graphene 2.0?

steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/steem-developer-update-graphene-2-0
+5%
Doesn't serve to improve the bitshares exchange.
Yes, I agree. Improvements could be made to the browser wallet to improve user friendliness.

What would be some of the security drawbacks? A centralized entity is trusted not to loose your wallet files incase you loose them.

Is SVK not on DPOS payroll? If not, and if he wants, he should be. There is a ton to be done!

You can look at the current workers here: https://cryptofresh.com/workers

The worker system is not being used, at all.

223
Thanks for the continued updates.  Your project has great potential.

224
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: September 29, 2016, 01:55:29 am »
Graphene 2.0?

steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/steem-developer-update-graphene-2-0

225
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: September 27, 2016, 05:49:14 pm »
Combining the lists.  I'd like to let this roll for awhile and see what everyone comes up with.  Around a weeks time we can then prioritize what should be tackled first and find the right person for that job.


GUI related:
GUI Browser support:
-We need an active worker to make sure this works on all major browsers.  This is significantly important and I can not see why ALL proxies would not vote to make this happen.  This alone is worth having @svk on the payroll.  SVK if this is something you can accomplish, how much do you need to make this happen?

GUI account creation:  I know this is openledger specific but that is all we have right now
-I try to monitor the chat box on openledger and often see users still do not understand the relationship between openledger and bitshares.  The comment "Your Web Browser is your Wallet" confuses people.  In the chat box they ask if this is hosted, why do they need to backup etc...  Something along the lines of "your web browser connects you to the bitshares blockchain via OpenLedger" could help clear this up.  "Your wallet never leaves your web browser" could also strengthen the security concerns.

GUI Market Organization:  I also see people confused on the now countless amount of markets available.
-Perhaps adding a filtering option where users can only view BitAsset markets?
-Simple shapeshift style guided trades.  Have another tab at the top next to exchange, no graphs, just simple drop down boxes.  Version 1 could have simply your assets on the drop down box on the left and what you want to receive on the right if that trading pair exists.  Version 2 could automatically make multiple trades to get you what you want regardless of fee's/slippage.
-Is there a way to split the screen and have two markets open at once?  I often check liquidity in similar markets, ie BTS/Steem vs BTC/Steem to see where it makes sense to trade.


Blockchain related:
-Easy way to run/host bitshares blockchain locally.  I see some documentation from Xeroc however is there a way we can provide pre packaged installations?  We can mimic Bitcoin with their "core" compared to other wallet options.  Windows/OSX/Linux/Raspberry PI options would be great.  https://steemit.com/bitshares/@ash/how-to-use-bitshares-via-the-interplanetary-file-system-ipfs is also interesting...

Sidechains:
-I think side chains are important and would be a huge move forward in relation to trust in the DEX; Smartcoins are great but making the user trust a 3rd parties to make good on the UIA that they are trading will always be a sore point for a 'trustless' decentralised exchange. UIA have their place but for trading other altcoins i think sidechained assets are important  and at the moment would give us a big jump on the market.

Login for webwallets: I do recall Bitshares Munich talking about implementing this idea.
-Perhaps give the user the option with each one clearly detailed.  Web based = less secure, log in from anywhere.  Local based, most secure but must have backup file.


Worker related
-Add worker proposal creation to the GUI.  We may want to recommend posting the proposal on steemit to create synergy and a single source of information.
-Is there a way for users to get notification of new worker proposals without having to constantly check?  A toggle switch for those interested in this would help.
-Can we add a data entry field where large proxies can put a reason why they vote approve/disapprove?  A small field with a link to their reasoning?

Blockchain explorer
-Continue development of Cryptofresh explorer.  Anything specific to be added or maintained here?

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 35