Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Brekyrself

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 35
212
General Discussion / Re: Bitshares price discussion
« on: October 11, 2016, 06:42:27 pm »
@lil_jay890 When you look at the top 10-20 on coinmarketcap one could say they all "suck."  Bitcoin has the first mover advantage however BTS and yes Steem are the only ones doing something different with real world use cases.

I did see in the troll box yesterday, OpenLedger mentioned a GUI revamp being done this month.  People do not understand bitcoin and when they load up bitshares, it's simply overwhelming.  I would hope to see the GUI revamp increase new user traction/retention and thus should drive up the price of bts.

213
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: October 11, 2016, 01:24:54 am »
Interesting info in the chat box today:

anonymous2572: do you have any roadmap or plans on GUI work?
anonymous1131: note that openledger here is always run by me Ronny Boesing
anonymous1131: I think you will see something nicve coming up in octiober
anonymous1131: almost done

anonymous2572: thats great to hear. I'm on here a lot and see very confused new users. hope to see improvements
anonymous2572: keep up the good work, this project has amazing potential
anonymous1131: yes, the new gui is meant to offer users three diffent ways to access
anonymous1131: basic, casual and experienced

214
General Discussion / Re: The death of Bitshares
« on: October 09, 2016, 10:19:16 pm »
What do you feel is wrong with Bitshares that needs immediate development?

215
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: October 05, 2016, 09:29:33 pm »
One of the releases changed the naming scheme and dropped the "open" part of assets.  This is confusing for new users as when your on the bts trading tab for example there is now BTC and bitBTC.  They do not know the difference.

If we keep this style of dropping the prefix, I believe there should be an additional tab with ONLY bitassets so users can be assured they are trading blockchain backed assets.
This is done by Openledger and it's only their choice. Bitshares client display prefixes as earlier.

I sent them a message, thanks for the tip.  I thought @svk was doing the GUI work for Openledger also?

216
General Discussion / Re: Graphene GUI testing and feedback
« on: October 05, 2016, 08:24:05 pm »
One of the releases changed the naming scheme and dropped the "open" part of assets.  This is confusing for new users as when your on the bts trading tab for example there is now BTC and bitBTC.  They do not know the difference.

If we keep this style of dropping the prefix, I believe there should be an additional tab with ONLY bitassets so users can be assured they are trading blockchain backed assets.

217
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: October 05, 2016, 08:20:29 pm »
Graphene 2.0?

steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/steem-developer-update-graphene-2-0
+5%
Doesn't serve to improve the bitshares exchange.
Yes, I agree. Improvements could be made to the browser wallet to improve user friendliness.

What would be some of the security drawbacks? A centralized entity is trusted not to loose your wallet files incase you loose them.

Is SVK not on DPOS payroll? If not, and if he wants, he should be. There is a ton to be done!

You can look at the current workers here: https://cryptofresh.com/workers

The worker system is not being used, at all.

218
Thanks for the continued updates.  Your project has great potential.

219
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: September 29, 2016, 01:55:29 am »
Graphene 2.0?

steemit.com/steem/@steemitblog/steem-developer-update-graphene-2-0

220
General Discussion / Re: Where is BitShares headed?
« on: September 27, 2016, 05:49:14 pm »
Combining the lists.  I'd like to let this roll for awhile and see what everyone comes up with.  Around a weeks time we can then prioritize what should be tackled first and find the right person for that job.


GUI related:
GUI Browser support:
-We need an active worker to make sure this works on all major browsers.  This is significantly important and I can not see why ALL proxies would not vote to make this happen.  This alone is worth having @svk on the payroll.  SVK if this is something you can accomplish, how much do you need to make this happen?

GUI account creation:  I know this is openledger specific but that is all we have right now
-I try to monitor the chat box on openledger and often see users still do not understand the relationship between openledger and bitshares.  The comment "Your Web Browser is your Wallet" confuses people.  In the chat box they ask if this is hosted, why do they need to backup etc...  Something along the lines of "your web browser connects you to the bitshares blockchain via OpenLedger" could help clear this up.  "Your wallet never leaves your web browser" could also strengthen the security concerns.

GUI Market Organization:  I also see people confused on the now countless amount of markets available.
-Perhaps adding a filtering option where users can only view BitAsset markets?
-Simple shapeshift style guided trades.  Have another tab at the top next to exchange, no graphs, just simple drop down boxes.  Version 1 could have simply your assets on the drop down box on the left and what you want to receive on the right if that trading pair exists.  Version 2 could automatically make multiple trades to get you what you want regardless of fee's/slippage.
-Is there a way to split the screen and have two markets open at once?  I often check liquidity in similar markets, ie BTS/Steem vs BTC/Steem to see where it makes sense to trade.


Blockchain related:
-Easy way to run/host bitshares blockchain locally.  I see some documentation from Xeroc however is there a way we can provide pre packaged installations?  We can mimic Bitcoin with their "core" compared to other wallet options.  Windows/OSX/Linux/Raspberry PI options would be great.  https://steemit.com/bitshares/@ash/how-to-use-bitshares-via-the-interplanetary-file-system-ipfs is also interesting...

Sidechains:
-I think side chains are important and would be a huge move forward in relation to trust in the DEX; Smartcoins are great but making the user trust a 3rd parties to make good on the UIA that they are trading will always be a sore point for a 'trustless' decentralised exchange. UIA have their place but for trading other altcoins i think sidechained assets are important  and at the moment would give us a big jump on the market.

Login for webwallets: I do recall Bitshares Munich talking about implementing this idea.
-Perhaps give the user the option with each one clearly detailed.  Web based = less secure, log in from anywhere.  Local based, most secure but must have backup file.


Worker related
-Add worker proposal creation to the GUI.  We may want to recommend posting the proposal on steemit to create synergy and a single source of information.
-Is there a way for users to get notification of new worker proposals without having to constantly check?  A toggle switch for those interested in this would help.
-Can we add a data entry field where large proxies can put a reason why they vote approve/disapprove?  A small field with a link to their reasoning?

Blockchain explorer
-Continue development of Cryptofresh explorer.  Anything specific to be added or maintained here?

221
Random Discussion / Re: Today is the first day of fall
« on: September 26, 2016, 01:26:16 am »
It is always difficult to walk the line between saying too little or saying too much.
Especially when we are talking about what other partners, investors, and clients may or may not do.
Yet that is the nature of what I am doing for BitShares.
So I pop up once in a while to say that I'm still working with many people in the community and elsewhere.
But I can make no promises and set no dates when many things are outside my control.
Rest assured, anything I can say, I will quickly post here and on Steemit.

Is there any talk within CNX to continue to develop BTS once Steem is at a stable release?

The BitShares ecosystem is the main focus of Cryptonomex. 
Cryptonomex and Steemit are as independent as Tesla and SpaceX.



Ahhh that comment just makes the rabbit hole even deeper!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-06/how-elon-musk-used-broken-marketplace-play-us-all

222
General Discussion / Where is BitShares headed?
« on: September 25, 2016, 07:25:12 pm »
How do we the community jump start this project?

The current state of visible development and activity around BitShares simply makes me sad.  I had become used to seeing constant development and excitement going from Protoshares > BtiShares > BitShares 2.0.  There was always something to look forward to, a roadmap, a better version etc...  Every since Dan and team departed to work on Steem we have not seen the community engagement this project deserves.

Looking around, you can see Satoshi had left Bitcoin and a world wide community has been pushing it ever since.  Glancing at Steem shows community development outside of the core team.  BitShares with it's very advanced blockchain technology should be attracting more development, what is holding this back?

Currently visible:
Xeroc always helping anyway he can.
Abitmore working on some blockchain code fixes
SVK working on the GUI
BitShares Munich with BlockPay and stealth.
Chronos working on videos
Stan always dropping interesting hints about things to come


Here is the feedback I am looking for:

1.  What developments or enhancements need to be done?  Let's prioritize a list.  (Be specific, is it a blockchain issue, gui issues, advertising issues etc...)
2.  With worker proposals at a standstill, how do we flip this around?


I'll start.

1.
GUI Browser support:
-We need an active worker to make sure this works on all major browsers.  This is significantly important and I can not see why ALL proxies would not vote to make this happen.  This alone is worth having @svk on the payroll.  SVK if this is something you can accomplish, how much do you need to make this happen?

GUI account creation:  I know this is openledger specific but that is all we have right now
-I try to monitor the chat box on openledger and often see users still do not understand the relationship between openledger and bitshares.  The comment "Your Web Browser is your Wallet" confuses people.  In the chat box they ask if this is hosted, why do they need to backup etc...  Something along the lines of "your web browser connects you to the bitshares blockchain via OpenLedger" could help clear this up.  "Your wallet never leaves your web browser" could also strengthen the security concerns.

GUI Market Organization:  I also see people confused on the now countless amount of markets available. 
-Perhaps adding a filtering option where users can only view BitAsset markets?
-Simple shapeshift style guided trades.  Have another tab at the top next to exchange, no graphs, just simple drop down boxes.  Version 1 could have simply your assets on the drop down box on the left and what you want to receive on the right if that trading pair exists.  Version 2 could automatically make multiple trades to get you what you want regardless of fee's/slippage.
-Is there a way to split the screen and have two markets open at once?  I often check liquidity in similar markets, ie BTS/Steem vs BTC/Steem to see where it makes sense to trade.

Blockchain:
-Many users are asking how to run the bitshares blockchain locally.  I see some documentation from Xeroc however is there a way we can provide pre packaged installations?  We can mimic Bitcoin with their "core" compared to other wallet options.  Windows/OSX/Linux/Raspberry PI options would be great.  https://steemit.com/bitshares/@ash/how-to-use-bitshares-via-the-interplanetary-file-system-ipfs is also interesting...


2.
-Add worker proposal creation to the GUI.  We may want to recommend posting the proposal on steemit to create synergy and a single source of information.
-Is there a way for users to get notification of new worker proposals without having to constantly check?  A toggle switch for those interested in this would help.
-Can we add a data entry field where large proxies can put a reason why they vote approve/disapprove?  A small field with a link to their reasoning?

223
Random Discussion / Re: Today is the first day of fall
« on: September 25, 2016, 05:55:50 pm »
It is always difficult to walk the line between saying too little or saying too much.
Especially when we are talking about what other partners, investors, and clients may or may not do.
Yet that is the nature of what I am doing for BitShares.
So I pop up once in a while to say that I'm still working with many people in the community and elsewhere.
But I can make no promises and set no dates when many things are outside my control.
Rest assured, anything I can say, I will quickly post here and on Steemit.

Is there any talk within CNX to continue to develop BTS once Steem is at a stable release?

224
OpenLedger / Re: USD, EUR and CNY Gateway created on CCEDK.com
« on: September 17, 2016, 07:07:29 pm »
ccedk

A user on the openledger troll box is saying they have been trying to register for FIAT since September 5th with no luck.  They also mentioned emailing  ronny@ccedk.com with no reply.  Anything to help this user?

225
Information is still scattered between here and steem thus may make it difficult for witnesses to keep up to date on information. 

-Could there be something built into the GUI when creating a new token that sends a bts with memo to the current witnesses for the feed to be considered?
-Perhaps an additional tab next to worker proposals for this situation to get feeds added by witnesses?

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 35