Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - fluxer555

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 50
211
General Discussion / Tether -- USD on the blockchain backed by bank account
« on: February 18, 2015, 05:50:10 am »
Friend or Foe?
What real advantages does BitUSD have over Tether?
What real advantages does Tether have over BitUSD?
How can we work together?
Where will we compete?

212
General Discussion / Re: Atm accepting gold silver
« on: February 18, 2015, 05:20:02 am »
Paging Gentso...

213
I'm unclear as to what the benefits are to doing this. Can you give a real-world example of this helping someone, and a side-by-side comparison of doing this vs. not doing this for a situation where this would save somebody from an attack?

214
I apologize roadscape, my comment was not relevant to your thread. Bytemaster has not commented about bitsapphire's proposal, but his comment here (which I quoted) is interesting when put in that context. I don't mean to hijack your thread, but the lack of developer opinion on the matter is a little frustrating.

215
Because you are now employed by the bitshares blockchain would you consider making the your check out code open source?

I am sure you will agree that doing this will only help to further adoption for bitshares as a whole, not to mention it keeps in line with bitshares open source nature.

Actually, anyone producing code *PAID FOR* by the blockchain needs to open source it or they don't get my vote.

Do you feel this way about BitSapphire's wallet?

216
Since you updated your API to migrate from BTSX >> BTS, coinmarketcap.com has been broken:

http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitshares-x/#markets

I would suggest making the migration backward-compatible to grandfather in laggards.

217
General Discussion / Re: Exco.in hacked, lots of NSR and Nubits stolen
« on: February 17, 2015, 07:32:51 pm »
Update from exco.in:

Quote
The remaining balances have been removed from the site by users.

We have located the real identity of the user 'ambiorx' who made the fraudulant BTC, NBT and NSR withdrawals and we will be pursuing legal action. We are preparing to hand over our logs, database and other information to the authorities.

In the meantime, we will be doing an audit of our systems and investigating the possibility of rebuilding the trading engine.

Samantha Chen (YT)
Excoin Lead Developer

218
So are you saying the method you came up with that I referenced was faulty?

219
I can't believe a buyout bailout is even being discussed.  Bter has proven their incompetency twice now.  First with the stolen nxt and now with stolen btc.  Until proven otherwise, we shall assume that what they have done is criminal.  They were entrusted with other people's money and now it has disappeared.  For all we know, the owner of the exchange could have stolen the money.  If you want to socialize losses, use fiat. 

This entire crypto bear market has coincided with many exchange failures, which is a good thing.  Slowly but surely, all weak links in the system are being disposed of.  We have precedent for this.  During the great depression in the US, over 9000 banks failed and most markets crashed.  Bailouts and debasement of the USD did not occur on a large scale.  What resulted over the next several decades was one of the strongest economies the world had ever seen (1940-2000), and this was on the back of a government issued currency and centralized, government controlled points of exchange.  The key ingredient then was that weak links such as poorly run banks were allowed to fail, instead of bailed out.  Fast forward to today.  We have a legacy economy fraught with bailouts and currency debasement which has resulted in a an unstoppable cancer that has spread so far and wide that it cannot be cured.  At the same time, we have an emerging crypo economy in the depths of a crypto depression.  This depression is necessary to weed out all weak links, such as incompetent and criminal exchanges and ponzi schemes.  I believe once this process is finished, we will see the strongest economy the world has ever seen because for the first time in history, we have the tools to solve many problems that were previously unsolvable (decentralized money, decentralized exchange, ect, ect, ect).  The timing is impeccable.  As the fiat system is beginning to crumble (Greek and Eurozone crisis, fiat currency volatility picking up), the crypto economy is getting stronger and stronger by the day.  We may soon see an unprecedented shift in global wealth... and if you blink you may miss it.  The next decade should be very interesting and I believe we are on the right side of it. 

Let bter fail.  It would be counterproductive to even attempt to bail them out.  Trading needs to migrate to decentralized exchanges.  It may be painful now, but the crypto economy will emerge much more powerful because of it over the long term.

+5%

220
Would it be possible to have a multi-multipool? Where it jumps around to the most profitable pools?

221
This is my third time asking, can you please answer this?

If developers change the blockchain protocol so that light clients cannot vote without the centralized server(s) having access to the private keys (in the method you described here), how would this affect your proposal?

222
The only way I could think of how voting could be cut out from a wallet or other app would be to change the vote registration from normal transactions including it to a special vote transaction which is paid for in transaction fees by the voter. That way voting would be opt-in always. However any wallet could easily have access to the private keys of the user, and therefore still vote the same.

Considering that any wallet which shares private keys to anyone besides the user would be considered malware, why is this not a viable solution?

223
Only a very small minority of bitcoin users lost money at Bter. Those people won't be happy, but the ones who want to avoid it happening to them will be interested.

224
General Discussion / Deflating BTS through IPOs and sharedrops
« on: February 16, 2015, 05:35:01 am »
In the past I have proposed a deflationary development model in response to the the introduction of inflation on the BTS chain. I have since realized that this model is flawed since it does not actually give the developer fungible funds for their development. (I'll elaborate if anybody wants me to, however I'm going to refrain in sake of brevity).

I have another idea, which is also deflationary to BTS, but adds an interesting twist. It can be done in both IPO and sharedrop forms, or a combination.

The idea can be most easily described by defining different distributions for the new AwesomeCoin:

Scenario 0 -- Standard Proof of Burn (included for completeness)
100% to BTS burners who burn with the memo "AWESOMECOIN"

Scenario 1 -- Sharedrop
50% to BTS holders
50% to BTS burners who burn with the memo "AWESOMECOIN"

Scenario 2 -- Fundraiser
50% to donators of BTS
50% to BTS burners who burn with the memo "AWESOMECOIN"

Scenario 3 -- Fundraiser, hardstyle
45% or 55% to donators of BTS
45% or 55% to BTS burners who burn with the memo "AWESOMECOIN"
Whichever group is larger gets the larger percentage

Scenario 4 -- Sharedrop / Fundraiser combo
20% to BTS holders
40% to BTS donators
40% to BTS burners who burn with the memo "AWESOMECOIN"

Scenario 5 -- Sharedrop / Fundraiser combo, hardstyle
20% to BTS holders
35% or 45% to donators of BTS
35% or 45% to BTS burners who burn with the memo "AWESOMECOIN"
Whichever group is larger gets the larger percentage

"This is madness! Why on earth would anyone want to do this?"

For one, there currently exists a problem that the sharedrop pump/dump cycle creates a predictable trading environment which can be abused by shorters / BitUSD holders. By having part of the sharedrop include deflation of the currency, this can help soften or eliminate the 'dump' part of the cycle.

Additionally, having a dual drop system creates incentive for each side to be equal, which constantly drives the lesser side upward. As anyone who participated in the AngelShares drive knows, this had an adverse effect on the PTS price because it became fixed to the equivalent conversion of the daily BTC donations. With this, however, there is never any sell pressure on BTS or anything else, but you get the same affect of this pushing both sides up.

I can already hear you: "Why burn, if they could have just donated that to the fundraiser too?"
I'm not going to pretend to know, but it would be an interesting experiment to see if the total donated to the development fund would actually be driven higher due to the competition with the burned fund.

Of course, another added benefit from this is that the BTS supply deflates. This could be a consideration if the project is synergetic with BTS, and can be considered a kind of risk mitigation for the project if it is not successful.

Thoughts and comments appreciated.

225
General Discussion / Re: Operation DarkNet
« on: February 16, 2015, 04:12:58 am »
This is what we're going to do:

1. Raise BitUSD awareness on marketplace forums.
2. Create tutorials explaining in detail how to go from BTC --> BitUSD and back again.
3. Post articles on DarkNet blogs such as DeepDotWeb (I'll be a regular columnist from now on).
4. Advertise metaexchange.info once they have BitUSD liquidity.

Do we have people assigned to these tasks already?

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ... 50