Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - ymtt

Pages: 1 [2]
16
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 囤积bitusd的价值正在凸显
« on: August 13, 2018, 04:17:32 am »
#比特股#
为了带动bts流量,可以尝试发行囤积bitusd的基金,长期囤积,为用户对冲人民币贬值风险,不购买bts,不吃爆仓单。作用:通过bitusd推广bts。


理论上可以开发银行换汇遇阻的优质客户。


同时可以探索bitusd承兑。
囤积bitusd,算是对bts的一种做空吗?尤其目前美元区体量这么小的情况下。

17
General Discussion / Re: I Am Making A New Market, Come Join Me!
« on: August 12, 2018, 01:32:18 pm »
good job ;D

18
we support the suggestion of bitcrab. just do it!


Don't talk for all.Majority doesnt support it
Don't talk for all.Majority support it

19
是否在喂价脚本算法中对“最高价”与“中值价”进行对比,防止偏离实际或者过于离谱的“最高价"出现?

比如:某个交易所禁止了充提,把价格刷高了。

不认为很有必要,禁止冲提价格只会偏低,而且过于离谱的“最高价”通常只能维持很短时间,也不会伤害谁。
想象一下,如果p网禁止充提了,作恶的团体在p网左手倒右手疯狂拉盘,喂价暴涨,内盘纷纷抵押套现,cny将不能保证锚定。
不能让一个封闭的系统影响一个开环的系统,会让内盘崩溃的,禁止充提的交易所提供的喂价应该及时降低权重,防范风险

20
是否在喂价脚本算法中对“最高价”与“中值价”进行对比,防止偏离实际或者过于离谱的“最高价"出现?

比如:某个交易所禁止了充提,把价格刷高了。

不认为很有必要,禁止冲提价格只会偏低,而且过于离谱的“最高价”通常只能维持很短时间,也不会伤害谁。
很有必要,但凡漏洞都会被人拿来作恶,交易所禁止充提,作恶的刷高喂价,内盘抵押套现,这就伤害了没有抵押套现的用户。

21
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 是时候和央妈一起积极发行bitcny了
« on: August 10, 2018, 03:45:07 pm »
赞同 :)

22
社区的反对声音主要是:
1. 公开市场基金不跟方程式操作
2. 公开市场基金跟SPRING的利益冲突

建议解决方案:
1. 加强CHECK AND BALANCE, 把多签3/5改成5/7,可以考虑加入Xeroc, Clockwork & Fav 这几个理事比较理性,有独立判断的能力。
2. 其实SPRING原本就应该交给外面的操盘手的吧!

最后,巨蟹退出公开市场基金等于废除这个基金了,社区很难信任不知道哪里冒出来的操盘手。
赞同公市基金跟方程式操作,但不认同公市基金和spring有利益冲突,spring本身就是来协助公市基金的。

24
Quote
while George Soros short HKD in 1998, as the Hong Kong Financial Management Officer, Mr Zeng Yinquan definitely need to do what he can to protect HKD and defeat Soros.

I can't imagine that Mr Zeng invite Soros to a party and tell him :"Well done, Buddy! Hong Kong is a free financial market, do what you like."

Maybe Mr Zeng remove the chance for Soros to buy HKD at the cheapest price, yes, that is his responsibility.

And so do OMO for BTS.

the chanllenge for OMO is how to get the purpose with high efficiency and low risk, surely OMO need to behave better.

Total crap which you have completly no understanding at all.
What you are doing here is mixing political battle using economics comparing to a healthy ecosystem which should grow.
China is since decades in an economical battle with the US to open their money control so  the US can flood China with uncontrolled money.For this purpose even Bitcoin was used in the past which leaded to a ban in China .
Sorros attack was an economical attack to weaken the chinese resistense and had nothing to do with making money.Of course when Soros is winning he is making money but this is not economical motivatd but political where you clearly lack of knowledge.

Also your argument using on a small ecosystem like bitshares is a joke.
Will people here suffer because of a lower price ?Have lower amount of food,being flooded with foreign worthless USD etc like in HK ?
I highly doubt that.The only suffering would be the big bag holders near margin loosing more BTS which would lead to a better distribution.

So this is a clearly fund to protect your own asset.
You are clearly using BTS for your own personal interrest and not for the benefit of the bitshares community cause i didn't saw a single proposal from you about marketing bitshares DEX to get new members .

Nothing about that.
The only thing i always see about you the last year is how we keep holding the price up so i won't lose much BTS.
I give a fuck if you lose BTS so as you give a fuck if i buy cheap BTS.

And you are clearly violating every single principle of bitshares dex being a decentralised exchange with full transparency.
You are not decentralised at all using not your funds to dictate a price and most important your transperancy is ZERO.

Another fact is that you give shit about the international community which will lead into a fight since people are tired of your crap and expacially favorising the chinese market destroying the bitusd market and in the same time pushing volume on gdex

Maybe i'm the only one who is talking about it openenly but you can read it everywhere in closed chats.
Commitee members seems to have no balls to tell it to you directly i guess fearing about their benefits however you reached a point were i say clearly STOP ........
You have done a lot for the bitshares community there is no doubt about it but this gives you not the right to start abusing it this way


Also please inform us who approved lowering the Ratio for creating new Assets from higher than 4 to lower than 2 ?
Did the community or commitee members decided about it ?

Of course i suffer because of a lower price, and i hate people who shorten Bitshares, they just want to get more bts in a lower price and sell them in a higher price, and then shorten bts again. They don't care about the development of Bitshares. Just as Tesla, so many people shorten Tesla, and Elon Mask and supporters of Tesla hate them. I hate people who shorten bts, so i support bitcrab who protect bts price.

Do you even understand how economics work ?
Do you have any clue how mass adoption works ?

You are clearly a selfish ignorant looking only to get your highest profit the quickest possible way without a real increase of value even hurting the healthy growth of that project
In fact, i think you are a foolish and rude man.
With the growth of smart coin ,then we can develop stronger ecology. so we need increase our smart coin with strong consensus. How we get strong consensus? just rely on the development of dex? OMO and spring fund will together all supporters of bts. Do you understand?
You say you understand how economics work. WHY i never find you have some good advice for the growth of Bitshares? or you just can oppose other who love bts and try to lead bts?

25
Quote
while George Soros short HKD in 1998, as the Hong Kong Financial Management Officer, Mr Zeng Yinquan definitely need to do what he can to protect HKD and defeat Soros.

I can't imagine that Mr Zeng invite Soros to a party and tell him :"Well done, Buddy! Hong Kong is a free financial market, do what you like."

Maybe Mr Zeng remove the chance for Soros to buy HKD at the cheapest price, yes, that is his responsibility.

And so do OMO for BTS.

the chanllenge for OMO is how to get the purpose with high efficiency and low risk, surely OMO need to behave better.

Total crap which you have completly no understanding at all.
What you are doing here is mixing political battle using economics comparing to a healthy ecosystem which should grow.
China is since decades in an economical battle with the US to open their money control so  the US can flood China with uncontrolled money.For this purpose even Bitcoin was used in the past which leaded to a ban in China .
Sorros attack was an economical attack to weaken the chinese resistense and had nothing to do with making money.Of course when Soros is winning he is making money but this is not economical motivatd but political where you clearly lack of knowledge.

Also your argument using on a small ecosystem like bitshares is a joke.
Will people here suffer because of a lower price ?Have lower amount of food,being flooded with foreign worthless USD etc like in HK ?
I highly doubt that.The only suffering would be the big bag holders near margin loosing more BTS which would lead to a better distribution.

So this is a clearly fund to protect your own asset.
You are clearly using BTS for your own personal interrest and not for the benefit of the bitshares community cause i didn't saw a single proposal from you about marketing bitshares DEX to get new members .

Nothing about that.
The only thing i always see about you the last year is how we keep holding the price up so i won't lose much BTS.
I give a fuck if you lose BTS so as you give a fuck if i buy cheap BTS.

And you are clearly violating every single principle of bitshares dex being a decentralised exchange with full transparency.
You are not decentralised at all using not your funds to dictate a price and most important your transperancy is ZERO.

Another fact is that you give shit about the international community which will lead into a fight since people are tired of your crap and expacially favorising the chinese market destroying the bitusd market and in the same time pushing volume on gdex

Maybe i'm the only one who is talking about it openenly but you can read it everywhere in closed chats.
Commitee members seems to have no balls to tell it to you directly i guess fearing about their benefits however you reached a point were i say clearly STOP ........
You have done a lot for the bitshares community there is no doubt about it but this gives you not the right to start abusing it this way


Also please inform us who approved lowering the Ratio for creating new Assets from higher than 4 to lower than 2 ?
Did the community or commitee members decided about it ?

Of course i suffer because of a lower price, and i hate people who shorten Bitshares, they just want to get more bts in a lower price and sell them in a higher price, and then shorten bts again. They don't care about the development of Bitshares. Just as Tesla, so many people shorten Tesla, and Elon Mask and supporters of Tesla hate them. I hate people who shorten bts, so i support bitcrab who protect bts price.

26
support bitcrab. we don't need to protect people who shorten bts.

27
中文 (Chinese) / Re: 可笑的喂价!
« on: August 01, 2018, 07:17:52 am »
喂价机制的确需要完善,去掉最低和最高再做平均都会好很多

Pages: 1 [2]