From my perspective, the biggest problem with adoption is getting BTC over to bitbtc in a cost effective manner. Let's say I transfer in some openbtc. If I decide I'd like to purchase bts, the openbtc/bts market is priced unfavorably compared to bitbtc/bts. This is going to sound naive, but I feel that "like currencies" should be exchanged not on an open market but on a one-to-one basis with only a handling fee applied, say .1%. This would dramatically spur activity because people would be able to get into the core asset at an acceptable exchange rate.

As an example, I'd like to be able to exchange openbtc for bitbtc at a published flat rate or a very small percentage fee.

not only a week goes by...and our great leader decides he will discover what is wrong with this world...by a forum post...

Great focus...while his product is a giant pile of...and the right thing is definitly to find what is wrong elsewhere while thing here are heading...no where.

[clapping  from the background]

@tonyk I can't figure you out. If I had to guess, I'd say you are young. You are abrasive and on the verge of being a bully. Maybe I'm totally off base and you are sarcastic. You clearly believe that you have been wronged. BM is clearly young and introverted and it sounds like you've backed him into a corner on more than one occasion, triggering him to lash out at you.

You guys throw blows but you aren't accomplishing anything meaningful or productive except to stroke your ego or defend a bruised one as far as I can tell.

Progress comes in small steps, identifying the most egregious faults and slowly chipping away at them, methodically. So, let's all try chipping away at things.


Some big items include:

Improving the deposit process
Make it easy for friends to send other friends bitUSD/bitCNY and for that same wallet to allow for easy conversion to BTS for people who want to speculate a bit in the underlying asset.

Life is too short guys. Let's be productive and make a badass Distributed Exchange.

Quote from: svk on December 06, 2015, 07:20:01 am

Quote from: Thom on December 06, 2015, 06:14:40 am

Quote from: svk on November 29, 2015, 12:22:35 pm

I've pushed a change that makes it so the total displayed in the header is the total for all accounts controlled by the currently open wallet. It will no longer be affected by accounts that you're just browsing. If you control no accounts, no total will be displayed.

Is this the value displayed on the top line to the left of the settings gear / icon? Any reason you didn't use a label with it, like "Wallet Value:"

Yes. No label to keep it clean, it really shouldn't be necessary imo, there will be a tooltip though  breaking down the totals by asset.

I'm a bit fan of tool tips. I think almost everything should have one attached. A tool tip on that value is all that's required to explain what that number represents, and, it keeps the UI clean. I had to ask what it was, b/c I'm not sure it's right, or how it calculates the value. It doesn't seem to add up in my case and the wallet contains only 2 accounts with very few assets.

It doesn't currently total assets held as collateral or open orders....but it will for v1209 !!

https://github.com/cryptonomex/graphene-ui/issues/584

We need a trollbox in Open Ledger. The current discussion board is fine and I think we need to get away from discussion boards and put the discussions into Open Ledger.

The more time we spend on the forum the less time we are spending in Bitshares.

@luckybit I think most of us are in agreement that a trollbox would be good. It's not a substitute for a discussion area though.

Thanks for the tips. Best to retire this thread since we have more recent upgrade announcement threads.

We've chipped away at the biggest ones. Pretty happy with where we stand on the big front.

One suggestion. Showing percent of NAV for each asset in the wallet would be cool.

I'm not sure what this means.

Voting needs a complete UX overhaul for worker proposals as well. I'd love to get a full understanding of voting, then maybe I can work with the UI team to build this into the graphene client.