English is not my native language, sorry for it

if someone have big power of X,  the can refuse the translation though it is valid
if every translation include the time signature by sender
translation delay---  the time period from time point it is broadcast by sender to time point it is included by block

a block include more translation delay have more Power of creating block

it is just a rough idea
want to get comment from all of you

代码只是肉体，对需求和业务逻辑的探讨是dac的灵魂。
不过多些人看代码肯定是好事。

两大逻辑 
主链逻辑 抵押逻辑

we know III is a generous company let public mine PTS, but in other word, PTS just an alternative-Coin, why it can develop so quickly in several months after it launched. maybe public supporting is a big reason
launching a new DAC and pausing BTS XT developing is really a helpful decision for III, it is really maximize the profit of III?
and how to give confidence to public again is a big issue of III.

toast 讲的  dns （toast） ，me（dan） ,lotto （arlen）  在并行开发，说不上 哪个第一个出来

没有人开发BTS 了 ？

Stocker
PTSer
AGSer
Meer

Quote from: Stan on March 16, 2014, 03:36:52 am

Quote from: FBI on March 16, 2014, 03:20:46 am

Is this the Roadmap of 3I development group?

BTS X was a compromise over BTS, BTS ME is a compromise over BTS X, what's next? Can you just make something working?

So far, it seems the only working product of 3I is PTS, which is technically no different from other thousands of altcoins.

Keyhotee has been advertised a long time, but neither of the basic two functions, decentralized communication and wallet, is realized. 

BTS has been delayed many times, before BTS ME is introduced.

I now really doubt the development ability of 3I, because I've never heard any successful company that CEO and key developer are the same person.

I was a fun of 3I, now I am considering to quit.

As Toast has reported, the code is essentially developed but the community has given great feedback about issues requiring more testing.  It would be foolish to launch all features at once without careful testing.  We must protect investors money.

I would never launch a new aircraft without lots of high-speed taxi testing on the ground before a short and very careful test flight over an unpopulated test range wearing two parachutes.   

You get to watch the tests incrementally this spring and evaluate our progress in a controlled environment.
In the meantime, we release the fruits of our work so far in tangible, useful form.  Other products you can trade, test, and experiment.

This will continue.  This is what we do.  Those who understand what it takes to bootstrap an entire industry will appreciate and approve. 

And this month we will make XTS liquid, so that those who are impatient will have a fair option to stay or go, as they choose.

Meanwhile, the Newsletter we are finalizing will lay out the complete roadmap for the coming quarter.  We are very excited about it.

 

Hello Stan,

It seems that some problems happened to the development of BTS X. And are there enough developers who are following the job? I just wondering just one guy who is Daniel in the team together with all the works such as developing, bug fixing, forum updating and so on?

Maybe I am not the first person who is asking this question. And sorry for my rudeness, I am worried about the process of Bitshares. Maybe you gonna finish the Bishares X first and after that you gonna focus on the other DAC.

Best regards
Fred

I think so 

Quote from: SuanBing on March 15, 2014, 06:05:35 pm

Quote from: sfinder on March 15, 2014, 05:59:44 pm

熊熊，不急。有糖糖吃。。。。。
其实吧市场分成有抵押和没抵押2个部分也是个不错的办法。 这样可以先活跃一下BTS的宣传效果。而且实现bitshare me的代码已经基本完成了。只要测试一下，没有像btsx系统那么多的风险。 保持投资者对BTS市场的持续关注也是很重要的

Quote from: BTS熊 on March 15, 2014, 05:06:44 pm

BM到底想干嘛？
脑子进水了是不？
整天不好好写代码
BTS X进度落后了那么多
还有空到处大篇大篇的发帖子思考怎么让支持者掏钱投AGS？
定好的2.28快照分配方案，居然“我有一个疯狂的想法”，你想个屁啊？
现在是干活的时候，是人家付了钱你要交货，而不是东西做到一半又开始谈价钱想着去刺激AGS竞投
屁事不干，就知道要钱，要你妈啊？ 老子冒火

再说这个BTS ME吧，你测试就给个BTS X阉割版的出来测试吧，我们无所谓的，你就算明年出来我也无所谓，或者你想提高AGS竞投我把自己的AGS全送给你也无所谓，麻烦请你先干活，先注意下进度
草泥马还是继续说这个BTS ME吧，既然是BTS X的简化版，以后的BTS X也要出来，那么我请问这个ME的使命到底是什么？以后出了X又如何处理？ 让2个BTS X并存？ 还是把ME当做玩具车给我们玩？
你他妈以为挣钱很好挣吗？就这样忽悠，老子真的是气死了，3I在我心目中的信誉已经破产了
曾经我是多么支持你们，再慢我也能忍受，也会宣传
可是现在这样搞，实在是太失望了，做生意没有你们这么做的
东西搞到一半，大家都等着米下锅了，你居然说AGS的价钱我们再好好谈一谈......

FUCK ...

如果将来Bitshares X出来，Bitshares Me还会保留吗？

Yes, BitShares ME is its own permanent family of DACs - giving rise to a whole new cottage industry of home-made applications.  Who knows what non-technical people will invent with this?

if bitshares me is a new dac  ,i dont konw if need a new dac Bitshares Me XT  to test it
it seems  iii have many dac  ideas   , but more dac more strict
as a ags invester   now much like a funtionable bitshares than many dac ideas

Quote from: AdamBLevine on March 03, 2014, 05:44:36 am

Maybe it's time to do a proof of burn into a proto-asset that actually trades on the first Bitshares chain.  Seems miners don't understand why they'd want to keep mining now that Bitshares has split off.

I don't think this is a good idea, I think it's good if PTS is kept "pure".

We actually don't care if there are barely any miners, we just care that they dropped so quickly that the difficulty doesn't have time to adjust and so blocks are slowed down

I think it is easy to solve this problem , just need to update the difficult change function ,
adjust difficult  100 block  or  adjust difficult per hour,   I think know if any update will case chain fork?