2071
General Discussion / Re: Bitcoins & Gravy EP64 - Bitshares on the Open Road!
« on: April 20, 2015, 03:13:06 pm »
That was really good guys.. you nailed it on so many levels! 
Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
2072
General Discussion / Re: A Toast to Toast
« on: April 20, 2015, 02:55:52 pm »
Thanks for the clarification BM.. the vacuum of silence here on matters like this creates a lot of crazy new stories.
2073
General Discussion / Re: BitShares Community News - The Nullstreet Journal - Volume 0.3
« on: April 20, 2015, 02:47:09 pm »Just wow. The journal is excellent. The pipeline is absolutely rammed. What a bloody amazing bunch of visionaries
We should be saving this comments to a db somewhere so we can include testimonials about the newsletter somewhere.
2074
General Discussion / Re: What's happening with the price?
« on: April 20, 2015, 02:45:44 pm »BTS suffers from many problems, past and present and though there are good developments in the pipeline which give BTS a lot of potential, none of them gave me a great deal of certainty that BitAsset use and adoption would increase drastically. Over the last few months I sold over 90%+ of my BTS and was waiting for a significant reversal in either share price or BitAsset adoption before I would consider buying again.
However BitAssets3.0 has completely altered my expectations. https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15775.0.html
These changes or some ultimate variation of them make BitAsset use far more attractive to longs and also to shorts too and I think will largely address BitAssets core problem of liquidity.
I will personally use BitAssets in fairly large quantities, even at the current stage of development. I also anticipate others will do the same.
I think we're going to see a sharp uptick in BitAsset use from existing BTS shareholders & others once these changes are introduced.
The increased BitAsset CAP's and adoption trend should quickly translate into a much higher valuation for BTS. So I've been buying at these prices even though it could still dip further.
You are welcome to come back via BunkerShares UIA!
.. if you want a use case for bitassets this is in my estimation the current most compelling one for use and returns. Either way happy to hear you are back to buying.
2075
General Discussion / Re: Theory: Could a DAC issue a bond to a DAC and repay it with future profits?
« on: April 20, 2015, 02:40:45 pm »
I think this might be something that will be possible with the management features of the UIA in the next future release.
I *think*.
I *think*.
2076
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BitShares Public Relations [Delegate Proposal]
« on: April 20, 2015, 02:38:45 pm »Great proposal
DPOShub as you described it would be a much needed tool! Is someone else already working on it? Who would do the programming? It's a big project!
DPOShub might not be an ideal name since Bitshares at its core may not be about DPOS in the future. On the other side DPOShub centers around delegates... A few random ideas for naming: bitshareshub, delegatehub.
Great questions.. we do have someone who has started on some programming.. but we certainly have a lot of work to do so if there is anyone else who wants to get involved you are welcome.
We are staying away from the bitshares name specifically because DPOS operates across all chains. Toyed with delegate type names.. but it just became much longer in comparison.
I have never heard of DPOS not being in the future of bitshares.. actually it has been the rock upon everything else has tethered. Can you elaborate on knowing something rest of us don't? Or was it just a 'could be' commentary?
2077
General Discussion / Re: [MetaExchange] dev-metaexchange.monsterer development diary
« on: April 20, 2015, 02:31:57 pm »more like the second
How would I go to cancel a limit order?
Which is the first?
Limit orders will have an expiry field which will let you chose the time they live for. Once expired, they are refunded to sender.
Nice added feature!
2078
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BitShares Public Relations [Delegate Proposal]
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:30:59 am »can the name DPOS of your projects change to something else ?
because while we know what DPOS is , other people don't .
It's not catchy , and it doesn't have any meaning while pronouncing to the outside world .
"Di Pauls" ..... that's what it sounds like ...
especially if you use it as a job listing site aiming for a lot of people outside of the crypto space .
Generally when it comes to naming schemes you want at least one of two things.. either where you are.. or what you are. In this case DPOSHub really is identifiable to what we are and in some ways where. I understand what you mean about the outside world not relating to what it is.. but the topic revolves around Delegates .. the name really focuses on that in a short simply way people can remember.
As far as the sound.. DPOS almost sounds like a new type of acronym for POS.. which is a common term in the business community for Point of Sale. If I were being introduced to this as a business community I might assume this to be similar until I learn of its full name, which would come across in the design in some way I am sure.
Regardless... feel free to submit suggestions on what type of catchy names you think might be better. No reason to not seek out improvements.
2079
Stakeholder Proposals / Re: BitShares Public Relations [Delegate Proposal]
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:17:03 am »
Awesome! Thanks Xeroc! Appreciate your vote!
2080
General Discussion / Re: |B|u|n|k|e|r|S|h|a|r|e|s|.|c|a| Presale Offer Updates *--=[SUBSCRIBE NOW!]=--*
« on: April 20, 2015, 06:05:55 am »
Just a reminder.. this thread is open to questions after you have looked at the offer.
I know our FAQ can't possibly cover all questions.. it would be good if I can field some more here to add to it.
I know our FAQ can't possibly cover all questions.. it would be good if I can field some more here to add to it.
2081
General Discussion / Re: Privatizing BitAssets
« on: April 20, 2015, 04:33:55 am »I agree that voting for feed producers that get paid each time they publish a feed with a minimal interval between feed publishings would incentivize things nicely and keep them separate from delegate responsibilities.
This is a great idea.Now you are catching on... the way we bootstrap is to give established players a profit incentive to bring us customers
Dammit.. I spent like a full minute hypnotized by this guy!
I am very excited about this new features.. already has rgcrypto and I trying to think of ways we could potentially incorporate it into MineBitShares.
2082
General Discussion / Re: USD crypto currencys
« on: April 20, 2015, 04:25:49 am »
I tried to find more.. but every one I found had withered and died long ago.
2083
General Discussion / Re: [ANN] Moonstone.io development and crowdfunder diary
« on: April 20, 2015, 04:23:16 am »
Remind me again. What is the plan for the Moonfund donors in the unlikely scenario that you do not meet your goal of 130K USD? How if at all do you plan to make such sponsors/donors whole?
Is it again the same principle - try to get N delegates elected and buy the Moonfund token at 1 BTS a piece? Or will those donations be treated as no string attached tips and no attempt will be made to pay them back?
PS
Do not get me wrong... I love Moonstone (as well as the Moon and The Stones), but just trying to decide on most appropriate trading strategy for my moonfund tokens. And for that I need clarity on the rules.
It's my understanding that no matter what the result the delegates are the payback mechanism.. assuming they are voted in.
I made some recommendations tonight in the marketing meeting on how this fund could best see it's way to success. It still has 50 days to go.. so I think it has a good chance at making it if they take the direction of targeting other markets. I can see some good things coming down the pipeline with the coverage.. now this needs developers support.
2084
General Discussion / Re: [BUNKER NEWS] -- It's BitAwesome!
« on: April 20, 2015, 04:14:44 am »
Since this is where bunker news is happening.. had to mention the new thread started!
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15816.0.html <<< Find out about BunkerShares!
https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php/topic,15816.0.html <<< Find out about BunkerShares!
2085
General Discussion / Re: gemspace -- SEC compliant platform
« on: April 20, 2015, 04:08:34 am »
I think this sounds awesome..
These are some of my qustions:
These are some of my qustions:
- You say compliance with Canada.. however, the securities compliance for crowdfunds in Canada are provincial and not federal.. will that be the level of compliance you will accomplish?
- You say maw paw shops.. that suggests to me you are going to need boots on the ground so to speak to act as gateways/hand holders to these businesses that otherwise know nothing about this opportunity to crowdfund. does the business model incorporate regional partners?
- You mention seeking out existing ATM operators.. I have a friend in my area that owns many in this area and manages them from top to bottom. What would be the advantage to him to incorporate this into his existing ATMs..can he?
- I have tens of thousands of sq/ft of space in the bunker that would be ideal for assembly and/or distribution... need a Canadian distributor? Guaranteed to keep inventory safe under all conditions!
