Pool down?

Pool does not support Memorycoin anymore.

Memorycoin was great for some months but time goes on.
RIP MMC
I would appreciate it to see you working with the BitShares community instead of wasting your time on this...

There will be time for that eventually, Vato. 

Current net is running on code from github..

https://github.com/memorycoin/memorycoin

I don't believe that MMCPOOL and 1GH got the memo about our change in source status. The source is staying open, however a few changes we implemented still had some crucial testing to do to make sure the network won't collapse.

The current source, which was updated to reflect pre-v3 conditions while we hammer these bugs out, are located on the github repo:
https://github.com/memorycoin/memorycoin

For now, the most active pool on the network is located at: http://mmc-square.com:8080/static/

If you would like to take advantage of the decrease in network power due to the shutdown of GPU pools, please redirect your miners.

How to connect on YAM:
mine = stratum+tcp://YOURADDRESS@mmc-square.com:8080/mmc
mine = stratum+tcp://YOURADDRESS@santana.mmc-square.com:8080/mmc

FIREWALL?
mine = stratum+tcp://YOURADDRESS@108.61.133.155:80/mmc

How to connect on minerd:
minerd.exe --url http://mmc-square.com:8080/ --user YOURADDRESS --threads x
minerd.exe --url http://santana.mmc-square.com:8080/ --user YOURADDRESS --threads x

FIREWALL?
minerd.exe --url http://santana.mmc-square.com:80/ --user YOURADDRESS -threads x


How to view Pool Stats:
http://mmc-square.com:8080/static/

Hi Jure,
please see this link for a tutorial on how to fix the problem.
https://mmc-square.com/support-help/4/how-speed-up-your-block-chain-update-process/322/

Quote from: bitmeat on October 04, 2014, 01:47:46 am

You really think your code is that valuable that it needs to be closed? Lol people compete on innovation. Are you saying NoirBits just copied MMC and had no innovation whatsoever?

Interesting that, I seem to remember 3 attempts at communication with my intent being to form a partnership then a merger later. There wasn't much of a response so I went ahead with my plans. I even wanted to use MMC implementation of momentum with an eye for merged mining in the future.

The community as a whole is falling apart due to lack of cooperation between leaders and developers. So to clear the air
1) check the about section of NoirShares you'll see that MemoryCoin devs are mentioned among others.

2 ) let's stop trying to make it on our own, cooperation is a surer bet.

By the way I had asked that you join our meeting and details of the meeting were published on our forum, mentioning NRS and hoping to create a partnership of some kind in the presented material.

It's still available here:
http://shrine.mmc-square.com/MMCDEV/mmcmeeting.7z

Some of these items have been changed since it was presented so don't worry about the change in supply in that-
Most of those ideas are now in the TODO topic list in the technical section of our closed Officer Board.



Since you've credited Memorycoin for using our code I hope to keep the open source model that we have, and believe that we can trust the open-source community, as long as they credit our code for usage (exactly where it's used).

I shall be updating the code on github shortly with the v3 adjustments.

Thanks for clearing that up with everyone, emre.

And itsik78 I'm surprised that you still hold your MMC. You think that MMC will go up so you can profit.

Quote from: Delinquency on October 04, 2014, 04:11:19 am

Quote from: bitmeat on October 04, 2014, 01:47:46 am

You really think your code is that valuable that it needs to be closed? Lol people compete on innovation. Are you saying NoirBits just copied MMC and had no innovation whatsoever?

No, I just meant that there was no credit given for using our code in their project.

The most valueable BTSX code is opensource   

You can secure your credit by a premine or whatever you call it.But close source is a buzz kill.

It'll get you nothing.Without opensource,most exchanges won't even want to enlist.Because they can't be sure what the hell you're doing behind the program.

It's a trade-off that we're willing to accept... There's a huge debate about open-source and close-source but it's actually about the integrity of the current team and the reasons behind the action:

• Not to secure a pre-mine; but to secure the code from competition that would love it in their "new alt-coin."
• There isn't much innovation behind our current update but the future updates will have essential code that we would like to protect.
• We offered current exchanges the source code, as well as for future releases, so there's no issue with exchanges that don't know what we're doing behind the code.