Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - akledirs

Pages: [1] 2
I think that reduce MSSR one may if CR<1.1 for prolongation live MPA, but not early. Else this changing significant conditions on the fly in favor of borrowers.

General Discussion / Independence of Witnesses
« on: December 21, 2018, 01:11:19 pm »
Recently, some members of the committee have often put forward proposals for voting, which in one way or another affect witnesses and feeds. In my opinion, the main work of the witness is to submit quotes honestly in accordance with his vision of the situation. A witness gives feeds at his own risk and peril, since votes can be withdrawn personally. Proposals affecting witnesses create centralized control. Independence of witnesses in their decisions will not allow such centralized proposals to emerge as bsip42. Witnesses are local auditors of borrowers. If large borrowers begin to attract auditors to close their eyes to their insolvency, change debt conditions on the fly, then such a system will quickly lose trust.

General Discussion / Re: Low-Feeding Witnesses fuck you
« on: December 21, 2018, 12:50:48 pm »
Witnesses with low price - are witnesses with real price. They do their work fair and not manipulate of price for support only one side - borrowers. Without fair feed prices - bitshares - scamDEX

General Discussion / Re: how to revive bitCNY?
« on: November 29, 2018, 11:46:24 am »
as currently there is big quantities of margin call orders, gdex-witness feed max(market price*MSSR, black swan protection price) to protect price from being pushed down with the positive feedback effect.

I agree that it's better to feed market price and set MSSR to a value close to 101%, however this need more discussion to reach consensus.
Better do MSSR dynamic in depend from worst CollateralRatio. More CR - less MSSR and on the contrary but after peak value (on my opinion CR=1.2 and MSSR~19%) if CR decrease need also decrease and MSSR for protection from BlackSwan. Must be stimulation for debtors not hold very low CR - this not safety for MPA. And better this regulation write in core-function, for protection from bitcrab  ;)

General Discussion / Re: please restart BSIP42!!!
« on: November 29, 2018, 11:30:46 am »
If Invisible hand of market decide. that bitCNY > CNY, I no think that witnesses must be manipulate of feedprice for safe interest of bitcrab and other big debtors

General Discussion / Re: how to revive bitCNY?
« on: November 27, 2018, 01:14:45 pm »
Reduce MSSR to 0.01%, reduce pricefeed to CR=1.01, offset=0%. Else - all you write - big scam for bitCNY holders

General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to handle bad debt (black swan)
« on: November 26, 2018, 12:59:01 pm »
I think such fund - bad idea. We get problem with differently collateralized debts. If all holders bitasset will want settle it, somebody not get full collateral.
Better do dinamicaly MSSR without manipulation feedprice (bsip42) - if collateralize down, then rise up margin % and after peak 1.2 down. (CR 1.75->1.2 : MSSR 0.02->0.19, CR 1.2->1.0 : MSSR 0.19-0).
For holders - peak moment - fine signal for exit from MPA with maximum premium, and after this moment there is time for action for savings own money.
For borrowers - stimulation not have very low CR and rise up it.

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 22, 2018, 10:36:24 am »
Now all good, confirm, unbanned :)

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 21, 2018, 06:01:49 pm »
We should ask "nasdaq" what happened
I asked him when there were similar events, only with a clearly linked account (oliverstone7).

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 21, 2018, 05:39:41 pm »
#29806541 blackswan baiducom - collateral price (36 bts)
I cannot find this operation on cryptofresh nor the web wallet block explorer page.
nasdaq-fb again give normal feedprice, that was cause blackswan and global settlement

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 21, 2018, 03:51:16 pm »
Artificial margin-call? What about artificial blackswan?
#29806202 rz120 debt 5 baiducom
#29806208 rz120 sold 5 baiducom for 220*5 usd
#29806241 nasdaq-fb feed baiducom 2322 bts
#29806247 nasdaq-fb feed baiducom 80 bts
#29806269 nasdaq-fb feed baiducom 20 bts
#29806280 rz120 reduce collateral (-18520 BTS)
#29806541 blackswan baiducom - collateral price (36 bts)
Time=15 min, profit=18520 bts
(For this information and recommendation sold other MPA from derivatives-dex I was banned from Telegram-group bitsharesDEX Now unbanned, was mistake)

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 21, 2018, 01:07:50 pm »
The less access rights the owner has left, the more secure the asset. For a better security of the asset, it is better to include the submission of quotations by the witnesses and disable the right of access to change this option. Another unobvious moment - the right of access to a change in the market commission - you can still establish it at 99%.

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 21, 2018, 12:57:42 pm »
I think, that transfering asset to null-account will lead to the impossibility of withdrawal from fee pool. Main idea for issuer of creating and owning smartasset - income from fee pool.

General Discussion / Re: SMARTASSETS SCAMS
« on: August 21, 2018, 08:18:42 am »
btsindex, why you not change rights for your smartassets? Such activities may rise up cost BTS, it popularity. I hope you create this assets not for cheat.
There is smartasset - GRIDCOIN, in which not right of issuer create blacklist, return themselves, but there is right switch give feed of delegate - now sw.on)

Chill out man, please explain why its a scam
Last next days nasdaq-bts give feeds with wrong value periodically. Sometimes this values upper in several times than real value. After that he sometimes revive asset if it blackswaned and take away big collateral from settlement fund. Sometimes use this for take profit on artificial margin call. This actions he do on account oliverstone7. Previously I think that other man, but transactions from derivatives-dex to oliverstone7 show that these 2 accounts controlled one man.

Pages: [1] 2