Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - akledirs

Pages: [1] 2
btsindex, please give feedprice and do force settle for all if not can give feeds constantly. I few months not can close position on S&P.

General Discussion / Re: Reduce MSSR of bitCNY to 1.01
« on: April 02, 2019, 03:28:48 pm »
Such method may will be cause new blackswan

When update? I want settle this on true price.

General Discussion / Re: S&P 500, Dow and other indexes as smart assets
« on: February 22, 2019, 10:10:55 am »
Thanks, akledirs. You're right. That's because of the bitUSD global settlement. The script gets the BTS/USD price from the blockchain. And it doesn't make sense anymore. I'll probably update it later to get the price from the outside. That can trigger the global settlement for INDEXSPX. If anyone knows how to contact babydragon, please warn them about that. That's the only borrower at the moment. Don't borrow the asset until that update!
His ratio 3.75, blackswan will not happen. Simple changing - use pricefeed from bts/usd but not market price.

General Discussion / Re: S&P 500, Dow and other indexes as smart assets
« on: February 21, 2019, 07:30:38 am »
Why you give price indexspx ~54500 bts if current price S&P=2792$, BTS= 0.0452$ and S&P=2792/0.0452=61769 BTS ? >13% different

General Discussion / Re: S&P 500, Dow and other indexes as smart assets
« on: February 20, 2019, 07:56:47 am »
Anybody know contacts bts-index? He stopped feedprice 15 feb 2019.

General Discussion / Re: BTC MPA backed by gateway.BTC
« on: February 20, 2019, 07:55:13 am »
If one from few gateway will be bankrupt, then MPA.BTC backed UIAs.BTC also will be uncollateralized. I think it bad idea merge risks few UIA in one asset.

General Discussion / Re: S&P 500, Dow and other indexes as smart assets
« on: February 12, 2019, 03:58:23 pm »
btsindex, you give wrong price on INDEXSPX. Diff>20%. Error - you use bitUSD price in your feed.

I think that reduce MSSR one may if CR<1.1 for prolongation live MPA, but not early. Else this changing significant conditions on the fly in favor of borrowers.

General Discussion / Independence of Witnesses
« on: December 21, 2018, 01:11:19 pm »
Recently, some members of the committee have often put forward proposals for voting, which in one way or another affect witnesses and feeds. In my opinion, the main work of the witness is to submit quotes honestly in accordance with his vision of the situation. A witness gives feeds at his own risk and peril, since votes can be withdrawn personally. Proposals affecting witnesses create centralized control. Independence of witnesses in their decisions will not allow such centralized proposals to emerge as bsip42. Witnesses are local auditors of borrowers. If large borrowers begin to attract auditors to close their eyes to their insolvency, change debt conditions on the fly, then such a system will quickly lose trust.

General Discussion / Re: Low-Feeding Witnesses fuck you
« on: December 21, 2018, 12:50:48 pm »
Witnesses with low price - are witnesses with real price. They do their work fair and not manipulate of price for support only one side - borrowers. Without fair feed prices - bitshares - scamDEX

General Discussion / Re: how to revive bitCNY?
« on: November 29, 2018, 11:46:24 am »
as currently there is big quantities of margin call orders, gdex-witness feed max(market price*MSSR, black swan protection price) to protect price from being pushed down with the positive feedback effect.

I agree that it's better to feed market price and set MSSR to a value close to 101%, however this need more discussion to reach consensus.
Better do MSSR dynamic in depend from worst CollateralRatio. More CR - less MSSR and on the contrary but after peak value (on my opinion CR=1.2 and MSSR~19%) if CR decrease need also decrease and MSSR for protection from BlackSwan. Must be stimulation for debtors not hold very low CR - this not safety for MPA. And better this regulation write in core-function, for protection from bitcrab  ;)

General Discussion / Re: please restart BSIP42!!!
« on: November 29, 2018, 11:30:46 am »
If Invisible hand of market decide. that bitCNY > CNY, I no think that witnesses must be manipulate of feedprice for safe interest of bitcrab and other big debtors

General Discussion / Re: how to revive bitCNY?
« on: November 27, 2018, 01:14:45 pm »
Reduce MSSR to 0.01%, reduce pricefeed to CR=1.01, offset=0%. Else - all you write - big scam for bitCNY holders

General Discussion / Re: New mechanism to handle bad debt (black swan)
« on: November 26, 2018, 12:59:01 pm »
I think such fund - bad idea. We get problem with differently collateralized debts. If all holders bitasset will want settle it, somebody not get full collateral.
Better do dinamicaly MSSR without manipulation feedprice (bsip42) - if collateralize down, then rise up margin % and after peak 1.2 down. (CR 1.75->1.2 : MSSR 0.02->0.19, CR 1.2->1.0 : MSSR 0.19-0).
For holders - peak moment - fine signal for exit from MPA with maximum premium, and after this moment there is time for action for savings own money.
For borrowers - stimulation not have very low CR and rise up it.

Pages: [1] 2