Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Vizierx

Pages: [1] 2 3 4
1
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« on: September 15, 2014, 07:13:38 pm »
could you check a readme file file on -g parameter, clearly said i check the readme and don`t understand how to run(( i will use old one what have -t parameter
also it will be good to have an example.but in all archives.
also i would like to know what is current speed on amd 290? - my shows 4300
Performance numbers without details on OS, Catalyst version and configuration are pretty useless, but 4300 cpm is slow if the newest drivers are used and if the GPU does not run into thermal throttling. The Linux and Windows drivers have totally different characteristics.

I hope that I can explain the use of the -g parameter with some examples. It controls the number of threads which are run on each GPU. Let's assume that you used -t 0,0 previously. That means that you run 2 threads on the device with ID 0. Therefore the new syntax would be -d 0 -g 2. -t 0,0,1,1,2,2,3,3 is equivalent to -d 0-3 -g 2 and -t 0,0,0,1,2,3,3 would become -d 0-3 -g 3,1,1,2. Using the newest Catalyst version on Windows, I have observed that spawning 4 threads per R9 290 and -a 2 gives a significant performance boost (-g 4 -a 2). Please note that the -d parameter is optional. If it is not specified than all AMD GPUs are used by clpts. You can still use the -t parameter but people with many GPUs per rig reported problems and something like -t 0,0,0,0,1,1,1,1 instead of -d 0,1 -g 4 is not convenient.

Ok so if i have 3 gpu in the rig my option will be so
-d 0-3 -a 2 -g 4,4,4

i have win 7 64 catalist 14.6 8 gb ram
with new parameters i write upper i have 5000 cpm om card(stock 947/1250 elpida)
and what cpm did you get?

2
BitShares PTS / Re: fast AMD OpenCL PTS/NRS miner released
« on: September 15, 2014, 03:30:56 pm »
I released clpts-v1.3. It resolves some issues and supports GPUs with 1GB RAM (see https://bitsharestalk.org/index.php?topic=2598.0 and read the README  ;D)

Good work man!

could you check a readme file file on -g parameter, clearly said i check the readme and don`t understand how to run(( i will use old one what have -t parameter
also it will be good to have an example.but in all archives.
also i would like to know what is current speed on amd 290? - my shows 4300



3
BitShares PTS / Re: What happened to Ypool?
« on: February 09, 2014, 11:16:35 am »
Seems like maxcoin support hurts others coins and they stop support it

4
Русский (Russian) / Re: Dogecoin на CPU?
« on: December 18, 2013, 04:39:08 am »
Их люди миллионами майнят какие 100 штук что за бред)))

5
BitShares PTS / Re: [ANN] ypool.net - Fast PTS pool
« on: November 25, 2013, 09:08:42 pm »
Down again!
Look like huge DDOS again ((

6
BitShares PTS / Re: GPU Miners are here... if rumors are to be believed!
« on: November 24, 2013, 06:55:39 pm »
Python is significantly slower than C.  Buyer beware.  Personally i would wait for a C implementation than buy a python one.
Sorry, but so what? You do not need ultra performance to send 10-20 packets of data/sec over network :) Most pools are running python, for that matter.

Anyway, sold.

Price? )))

7
General Discussion / Re: BTC vs PTS What ratio will be ?
« on: November 20, 2013, 06:54:45 pm »
I expect better than 1:1 in protoshares favor.  Bitcoin is just a money network, holding protoshares pays you in being the first to hold new ideas in cryptocurrency.
From your lips to God's ears )

8
who can answer how much  i get for 1 share in miner? nobody answer this (((

9
Русский (Russian) / Re: Перекличка
« on: November 18, 2013, 10:52:51 am »
+1 )

10
Русский (Russian) / Re: Рентабельность пулов
« on: November 15, 2013, 07:27:23 pm »
Пулы падают как мухи - про рентабельность(стабильность) пока говорить сложно...

11
ok on payout section it says minimum payout 2 pTS but when try to change after each try it resets to 5PTS .. any suggestions about ?
5 is minimum.

12
Marketplace / Re: [WTS] 100 PTS @ 0.1 BTC /PTS total of 10 BTC for 100 PTS
« on: November 15, 2013, 02:39:35 pm »
Good price) lol

13
DOWN AGAIN?  :(

14
Increasing memory will hurt performance, due to increased cache misses.

Weird, i thought that protoshares were supposed to be very memory heavy.  Will the 1.5 GB requirement increase as the difficulty goes up?  What would be the most ideal setup for mining protoshares then? What is more important fast RAM or RAM timings? Is a large CPU Cache important?

Thanks!

Want to know it too!

15
I get my payments from this poll - look like all works
thanks

Pages: [1] 2 3 4